The Accidentality of Existence in Avicenna and its Critique by Averroes
In: Journal of Persianate StudiesSearch for other papers by † Yegane Shayegan in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The accidentality of existence in Avicenna (Ebn Sinā, d. 1037) is related to his distinction between “existence (vojud)” and “quiddity (māhiyya).” Both these theories have been greatly criticized by Averroes (Ebn Roshd, d. 1198). The latter’s misunderstanding of Avicenna has been the cause of confusion for the comprehension of Aristotle (d. 322
This paper will try to clarify how this phenomenon perpetuated a global confusion and misunderstanding between the East and the West and also created a disastrous situation for the comprehension of the Peripatetic School. This state of affairs has continued up to the present day among both medievalists and scholars of Aristotelian philosophy. However, it is not my intention in this paper to give a complete review of Western and Eastern scholarship on this subject. Rather, I shall limit myself (with some exceptions) to the works of Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias (fl. c. 205) and other Greek commentators, Avicenna, and Averroes, which together constitute the primary sources for the ongoing discussion around the nature of “essence” and “existence” in Avicenna’s works.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alexander of Aphrodisias, Commentaria in Aristotelem Græca, vol. 1, In Metaphysica commentaria, ed. M. Hayduck, Berlin, 1891.
-
Alexander of Aphrodisias, On Aristotle’s Metaphysics, tr. W. E. Dooley and A. Madigan, 5 vols., Ithaca/London, 1989–1994.
-
Thomas Aquinas, In duodecim libros metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio, ed. M. R. Cathala, R. M. Spiazzi, Turin/Rome, 1950.
-
Thomas Aquinas, In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio, tr. J. P. Rowan as Commentary on the Metaphysics of Aristotle, 2 vols., Chicago, 1961.
-
Aristotle, Aristotle, the Physics, ed. and tr. P. H. Wicksteed and F. M. Cornford, 2 vols., Loeb Classical Library, London, 1929–1934.
-
Aristotle, Aristotle’s Metaphysics, tr. H. G. Apostle, Grinnell, Iowa, 1979.
-
Aristotle, Éthique à Nicomaque, ed. and tr. J. Tricot, Paris, 1994.
-
Aristotle, The Metaphysics, ed. and tr. H. Tredennick and G. C. Armstrong, 2 vols., Loeb Classical Library 271 and 287, Cambridge, 1977.
-
Aristotle, Metaphysics, ed. W. Jaeger, Oxford Classical Texts, Oxford, 1989.
-
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, ed. and tr. H. Rackham, Loeb Classical Library, London/New York City, 1926.
-
Aristotle, Organon, ed. and tr. J. Tricot, 5 vols., Paris, 1990–1995.
-
Aristotle, Physica, ed. W. D. Ross, Oxford, 1950.
-
Aristotle, Physique: i–iv, ed. and tr. H. Carteron, Paris, 1966.
-
Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, ed. and tr. H. Tredennick, Loeb Classical Library 391, Cambridge/London, 1976.
-
Aristotle, Topica et Sophistici elenchi, ed. W. D. Ross, Oxford, 1958.
-
S. J. Ashtiāni, Hasti az manzar-e falsafe va erfān, Mashhad, 1960/1380.
-
P. Aubenque, Le problème de l’être chez Aristote: Essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne, Paris, 1962.
-
P. Aubenque, “Plotin et Dexippe, exégètes des catégories d’Aristote,” in Aristotelica: Mélanges offerts à Marcel de Corte, ed. A. Motte and C. Rutten, Brussels/Liège, 1985, pp. 7–40.
-
H. Bonitz, Aristotelis opera, vol. 5, Index Aristotelicus, Berlin, 1985.
-
E. Booth, Aristotelian Aporetic Ontology in Medieval Christian and Islamic thinkers, Cambridge studies in medieval life and thought 3rd ser. 20, Cambridge, 1983.
-
R. Brandner, “Aristotele e la fondazione henologica dell’ ontologia,” Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica 88 (1996), pp. 183–204.
-
L. Couloubaritsis, “L’être et l’Un chez Aristote,” Revue de philosophie ancienne 1 (1983), pp. 49–98, 143–195.
-
L. Couloubaritsis, “Le statut de l’Un dans la ‘Métaphysique,’ ” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 90.88 (1992), pp. 497–522.
-
L. Couloubaritsis, La physique d’Aristote: L’avènement de la science physique, 2nd ed., Brussels, 1997.
-
Dexippus, Commentaria in Aristotelem Græca, vol. 4.2, In Categorias commentarium, ed. A. Busse, Berlin, 1888.
-
Dexippus, In Aristotelis categorias, tr. J. M. Dillon as On Aristotle’s Categories, Ancient Commentators on Aristotle, Ithaca/London, 1990.
-
Ebn Roshd, Tafsir mā baʿd al-tabiʿat, ed. M. Bouyges, 3 vols, Bibliotheca Arabica scholasticorum série arabe 5–7, Beirut, 1938–1952.
-
Ebn Roshd, Tahāfot al-tahāfot, ed. M. Bouyges, Publications of the Institute for the History of Arabic-Islamic Science 56; Bibliotheca Arabica scholasticorum 3, 1930; reprint, Frankfurt, 1999.
-
Ebn Roshd, Tahāfot al-tahāfot, tr. S. van den Bergh as Averroes’ Tahafut al-tahafut (The Incoherence of the incoherence), E. J. W. Gibb Memorial n.s. 19, 2 vols., London, 1969.
-
Ebn Sinā, al-Eshārāt va-ʾl-tanbihāt, ed. S. Dunyā, 4 vols., Cairo, 1983–1994.
-
Ebn Sinā, Liber De Philosophia prima, sive, Scientia divina i–iv, ed. S. van Riet, 3 vols., Louvain/Leiden, 1977.
-
Ebn Sinā, al-Najāt: Men al-gharq fi bahr al-zalālāt, ed. M.-T. Dānesh-pazhuh, Enteshārāt-e Dāneshgāh-e Tehrān 1863, Tehran, 1985–1986.
-
Ebn Sinā, al-Shefāʾ, ed E. Madkur, G. C. Anawati, M. M. Khozeyri, and A. F. Ahvāni, 10 pts. in 4 vols., 11952–1960; reprint, Qom, 2012/1433; online: http://alfeker.net/library.php?id=3727.
-
Ebn Sinā, al-Shefāʾ, ed. S. Zāyed, 27 vols., Cairo, 1983.
-
Ebn Sinā, al-Taʿliqāt, ed. ʿA.-R. Badavi, al-Maktaba al-ʿArabiyya 130 torāth 29 tasavvof 3, Cairo, 1973.
-
Gh. Ebrahimi Dinani, Derakhshesh-e Ebn Roshd dar hekmat-e mashaʾ, Tehran, 2005/1384.
-
Eustratius, Commentaria in Aristotelem Græca, vol. 21.1, In Analyticorum posteriorum librum secundum commentarium, ed. M. Hayduck, Berlin, 1907.
-
Abu Nasr Fārābi, Ketāb al-horuf, ed. M. Mahdi, Bohuth va-derāsāt be-ʾdārat Maʿhad al-Adab al-Sharqiyya 46, Beirut, 1970.
-
É. Gilson, L’être et l’essence, 2nd ed., Paris, 1972.
-
T. Izutsu, The Concept and Reality of Existence, Studies in the humanities and social relations 13, Tokyo, 1971.
-
O. Leaman, Averroes and his Philosophy, Oxford, 1988.
-
A. de Muralt, Comment dire l’être? L’invention du discours métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris, 1985.
-
A. de Muralt, “Comment dire l’être? Le probléme de l’être et ses significations chez Aristote,” Studia Philosophica 23 (1963), pp. 109–204.
-
G. E. L. Owen and M. C. Nussbaum, Logic, Science and Dialectic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy, Ithaca/London, 1986.
-
Joannes Philoponus, Commentaria in Aristotelem Græca, vol. 13, In Analytica posteriora commentaria, ed. M. Wallies, Berlin, 1882.
-
Joannes Philoponus, Commentaria in Aristotelem Græca, vol. 16, In Physicorum libros tres priores commentaria, ed. H. Vitelli, Berlin, 1887.
-
Joannes Philoponus, Commentaria in Aristotelem Græca, vol. 17, In Physicorum libros quinque posteriores commentaria, ed. H. Vitelli, Berlin, 1887.
-
Joannes Philoponus, In Aristotelis Physicorum commentaria 2, tr. A. R. Lacey as On Aristotle’s Physics 2, Ancient commentators on Aristotle, Ithaca/London, 1993.
-
Joannes Philoponus, In Aristotelis Physicorum commentaria 3, tr. M. J. Edwards as On Aristotle’s Physics 3, Ancient commentators on Aristotle, Ithaca/London, 1994.
-
S. Pines, “A New Fragment on Xenocrates and its Implications,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society n.s. 51.2 (1961), pp. 3–34.
-
Porphyry, Commentaria in Aristotelem Græca, vol. 4.1, Isagoge et in Categorias commentarium, ed. A. Busse, Berlin, 1887.
-
Porphyry, In Aristotelis categorias expositio per interrogationem et responsionem, tr. S. K. Strange as On Aristotle’s Categories, Ithaca/London, 1992.
-
Porphyry, Isagoge, ed. and tr. A. de Libera and A. Ph. Segonds, Paris, 1998.
-
F. Ravaisson, Essai sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote, 2 vols., Paris, 1963.
-
L. Robin, La théorie platonicienne des idées et des nombres d’après Aristote: Étude historique et critique, 2 vols., Paris, 1908.
-
Sadr al-Din Shirāzi (Mollā Sadrā), Ketāb al-mashāʿer, tr. H. E. Corbin as Le livre des pénétrations métaphiysiques, Bibliothéque iranienne 10, Tehran/Paris, 1964.
-
Sadr al-Din Shirāzi (Mollā Sadrā), al-Resāla fi-ʾl-tasavvor va-ʾl-tasdiq, tr. J. Lameer as Conception and belief in Ṣadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī (ca 1571–1635): al-Risāla fī l-taṣsawwur wa-l-taṣdīq, Tehran, 2006.
-
Y. Shayegan, Avicenna on Time, unpub. PhD diss., Harvard University, 1986.
-
Simplicius, Commentaria in Aristotelem Græca, vol. 8, In Categorias commentarium, ed. C. Kalbfleisch, Berlin, 1907.
-
Simplicius, Commentaria in Aristotelem Græca, vol. 9, In Physicorum libros quattuor priores commentaria, ed. H. Diels, Berlin, 1882.
-
Simplicius, In Aristotelis Physica commentaria: Lib. 4, tr. J. O. Urmson as On Aristotle’s Physics 4.1–5, 10–14, Ancient Commentators on Aristotle, Ithaca/London, 1992.
-
Simplicius, In Aristotelis Physica commentaria: Lib. 2, tr. B. Fleet as On Aristotle’s Physics 2, Ancient Commentators on Aristotle, Ithaca/London, 1997.
-
Themistius, Commentaria in Aristotelem Græca, vol. 5.1, Analyticorum posteriorum paraphrasis, ed. M. Wallies, Berlin, 1900.
-
M. M. Tweedale, “Alexander of Aphrodisias’ View on Universals,” Phronesis 29.3 (1984), pp. 279–303.
-
M. Zingano, “L’homonymie de l’être et le projet métaphysique d’Aristote,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 51.201 (September 1997), pp. 333–356.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 267 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 862 | 71 | 9 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 823 | 63 | 10 |
The Accidentality of Existence in Avicenna and its Critique by Averroes
In: Journal of Persianate StudiesSearch for other papers by † Yegane Shayegan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The accidentality of existence in Avicenna (Ebn Sinā, d. 1037) is related to his distinction between “existence (vojud)” and “quiddity (māhiyya).” Both these theories have been greatly criticized by Averroes (Ebn Roshd, d. 1198). The latter’s misunderstanding of Avicenna has been the cause of confusion for the comprehension of Aristotle (d. 322
This paper will try to clarify how this phenomenon perpetuated a global confusion and misunderstanding between the East and the West and also created a disastrous situation for the comprehension of the Peripatetic School. This state of affairs has continued up to the present day among both medievalists and scholars of Aristotelian philosophy. However, it is not my intention in this paper to give a complete review of Western and Eastern scholarship on this subject. Rather, I shall limit myself (with some exceptions) to the works of Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias (fl. c. 205) and other Greek commentators, Avicenna, and Averroes, which together constitute the primary sources for the ongoing discussion around the nature of “essence” and “existence” in Avicenna’s works.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 267 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 862 | 71 | 9 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 823 | 63 | 10 |
