The Skopos Assumption: Its Justification and Function in the Neoplatonic Commentaries on Plato

The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition
著者: Dirk Baltzly 1
浏览更多 浏览更少
  • 1 School of Humanities, University of Tasmania, Hobart tas 7001, AUSTRALIA

Abstract

This paper examines the role of the theme (prothesis or skopos) in Neoplatonic interpretive practice, particularly with respect to Platonic dialogues. The belief that every dialogue has a single skopos and that every aspect of the dialogue can be seen as subserving that skopos is one of the most distinctive of the Neoplatonists’ intepretive principles. It is also the one that is most directly responsible for the forced and artificial character of their readings of Plato. The arguments offered in support of this principle are manifestly inadequate to justify the role that it plays. This is so even if we evaluate those arguments by the Neoplatonists’ own lights. If we want to understand how this practice seemed rational to them, we need to consider more than their texts and Plato’s. We need to consider the role that the shared act of reading a Platonic dialogue with the teacher had in transforming the souls of the students and in the self-understanding of Neoplatonic teachers. I. Hadot, among others, has argued that the continuous commentary was a kind of spiritual exercise. I largely agree with her conclusion, though I believe her analysis of the sense in which these were spiritual exercises needs to be deepened. I argue that the justification for the assumption that each dialogue has a single skopos is best understood by reference to the manner in which the practice of commentary functioned within the internal economy of their schools considered as textual communities.

  • Baltzly, Dirk. 2006. “Pathways to purification: the cathartic virtues in the neoplatonic commentary tradition.” In Reading Plato in Antiquity, edited by Harold Tarrant and Dirk Baltzly, 169-184. London: Duckworth.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Baltzly, Dirk. 2014. “Plato’s Authority and the Formation of Textual Communities in Late Antiquity.” Classical Quarterly 64 (2):793-807.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Brisson, L. 2006. “The doctrine of the degrees of virtue in the Neoplatonists: an analysis of Porphyry’s Sentences 32, its antecedents, and its heritage.” In Reading Plato in Antiquity, edited by Harold Tarrant and Dirk Baltzly, 89-106. London: Duckworth.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Festugière, A.J. 1971. “Modes de composition des Commentaires de Proclus.” In Études de Philosophie Grecque, edited by A.J. Festugière, 551-574. Paris: J. Vrin.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Hadot, I. 1987. “Les introductions aux commentaires exégétiques chez les auteurs néoplatoniciens et les auteurs chrétiens.” In Les regles de l’interpretation, edited by Michel Tardieu, 99-122. Paris: Centre d’études des religions.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Hadot, I. 1997. “Le commentaire philosophique continu dans l’antiquité” Antiquité tardive: revue internationale d’histoire et d’archéologie 5:169-176.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Heath, M. 1989. Unity in Greek Poetics: Clarendon Press.

  • Hoffmann, P. 1998. “La fonction de prologues exégétiques dans la pensée pédagogique néoplatonicienne.” In Entrer en matière: Les prologues, edited by J.-D. Dubois and B. Roussel, 209-281. Paris: Cerf.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Karamanolis, George E. 2006. Plato and Aristotle in agreement?: Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry, Oxford philosophical monographs. Oxford and New York, New York: Oxford University Press.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Mansfeld, Jaap. 1994. Prolegomena: questions to be settled before the study of an author or a text, Philosophia antiqua, Leiden; New York: E.J. Brill.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Praechter, Karl. 1910. “Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus.” In Genethliakon Carl Robert, 104-156. Berlin: Weidmann.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Sorabji, Richard. 2005. The Philosophy of the Commentators: Vol. 3: Logic and Metaphysics. 3 vols. Vol. 3. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Tarrant, Harold. 2014. “Platonist curricula and their influence.” In The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, edited by Pauliina Slaveva-Griffin Remes, Svetla, 15-29. London and New York: Routledge.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Watts, E.D. 1988. “Translating the Personal Aspect of Late Platonism in the Commentary Tradition.” In Interpreting the Bible and Aristotle in Late Antiquity: The Alexandrian Commentary Tradition between Rome and Baghdad, edited by J. Lössl and J. Watt, 137-150. Farnham (Surrey): Ashgate Publishing.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Westerink, L.G. 1962. Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

内容统计数据

全部期间 过去一年 过去30天
摘要浏览次数 123 104 9
全文浏览次数 518 178 1
PDF下载次数 71 28 0