Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
‘Continue to wash your hands, continue to wear your mask, continue to sanitize, continue to maintain social distance, and lastly continue to pray’. These were the closing remarks of a pastor who was preaching online to his congregants in the context of the second and third waves of COVID-19 variants. This article focuses on the church’s utilisation (or lack) of both religion and science under the ‘wash’ and ‘pray’ theology. The article raises this fundamental question: to what extent is the church embracing scientific knowledge in its efforts to deal with COVID-19? Data was collected through an online questionnaire survey, review of available literature, listening to clerics on YouTube, follow-up WhatsApp interviews, as well as overt and covert observations. The article argues that religion and science differ on a number of issues but in the context of COVID-19 and as indicated by this study, they must learn from each other and pool resources to combat COVID-19. COVID-19 calls for undivided attention, and when religion and science unify humanity vastly benefit. The article adds to the continuous debate on the relationship between science (wash) and religion (pray), arguing for the significance of religious ideas that make science effective in addressing the pandemic and vice versa.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Babbie, E. 2017. The Basics of Social Research, 7th ed. Boston, MA: CenGage Learning.
Bentzen, J.S. 2020. ‘In Crisis, We Pray: Religiosity and the COVID-19 Pandemic’. Mcusercontent.com. Accessed 19 September 2021.
Carey, L.B., and J. Cohen. 2015. ‘The utility of the WHO ICD-10-AM pastoral intervention codings within religious, pastoral and spiritual care research’. Journal of Religion and Health 54, 1772–1787. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266421/. Accessed 13 July 2021.
Coupland, N. 2010. ‘Accommodation theory’. In Jurgen Jaspers (ed.), Society and Language Use. City: John Benjamin Publishing Company, 21–28.
Creswell, J.W., and V.L. Plano Clark. 2007. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Falade, B. 2020. ‘COVID-19, religious institutions and the accommodation of science in Africa’. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2020/04/20/COVID-19-religious-institutions-public-health-science-africa/. Accessed 13 July 2021.
Government of Zimbabwe. 2020. ‘COVID-19 claims first Zim victim’. http://www.zim.gov.zw/index.php/en/news-room/latest-news/496-covid-19-claims-first-zim-victim. Accessed 24 September 2021.
Halbfinger, D.M. 2020. ‘Coronavirus in Israel: Virus Soars Among Ultra-Orthodox Jews as Many Flout Israel’s Rules’. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/06/calls-to-seal-off-ultra-orthodox-areas-adds-tension-to-israels-virus-response. Accessed 8 February 2021.
Hartley, J.E. 1992. Leviticus. Dallas, TX: Word Books.
Henry, M. 1996. Mathew Henry’s Commentary on the whole Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.
Hong, B.A., and P.J. Handal. 2020. ‘Science, Religion, Government and SARS-CoV-2: A Time for Synergy’. Journal of Religion and Health, 1–6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266421/. Accessed 13 July 2021.
Hulse, E.V. 1975. ‘The nature of biblical “leprosy” and the use of alternative medical terms in modern translations of the Bible’. The Palestine Exploration Quarterly 107.2, 87–105.
Isiko, A.P. 2020. ‘Religious construction of disease: An exploratory appraisal of religious responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda’. Journal of African Studies and Development 12.3, 77–96.
Jovchelovitch, S., and J. Priego-Hernandez. 2015. ‘Cognitive polyphasia, knowledge encounters and public spheres’. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, and J. Valsiner (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 163–178.
Kowalczyk, O., K. Roszkowski, X. Montane, W. Pawliszak, B. Tylkowski, and A. Bajek. 2020. ‘Religion and Faith in a Pandemic of COVID-19’. Journal of Religion and Health 59, 2671–2677.
Leon, A.C., L.L. Davis, and H.C. Kraemer. 2011. ‘The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research’. Journal of Psychiatric Research 45.5, 626–629.
Lumberas, S., and L. Oviedo. 2020. ‘The pandemic and its influence on the relationship between science, religion, and theology’. ESSSAT News & Reviews 30, 1–12.
Makandiwa, E. 2021. ‘The Vaccine Designed to Make Humans Lose Strength’. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkVnjxAES98. Accessed 13 July 2021.
Mbiti, J.S. 1969. African Religions and Philosophy. London: Heinemann.
McMillan, J.H., and S. Schumacher. 2014. Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry, 7th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Moscovici, S. 1991/2014. ‘The new magical thinking’ (translation of 1991 French original). Public Understanding of Science 23.7, 759–779.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. 2018. Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization. London: Routledge.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. 2020. ‘Geopolitics of Power and Knowledge in the COVID-19 Pandemic; Decolonial reflections on a Global Crisis’. Journal of Developing Societies 36.4, 366–389.
NewsdzeZimbabwe. 12 July 2021. ‘Outrage over Vapositori Bocha Pilgrimage’. file:///Users/tensonmuyambo/Desktop/Muyambo%20and%20Sande/OUTRAGE%20OVER%20VAPOSITORI%20BOCHA%20PILGRIMAGE%20newsdzeZimbabweNewsdzeZimbabwe.webarchive. Accessed 13 July 2021.
Odora Hoppers, C.A. 2007. ‘Philosophical and Institutional Challenges in Integrating Women in Science and Technology in Africa’. In N’Diri Assie-Lumumnba (ed.), Women and Higher Education in Africa: Reconceptualizing Gender-Based Human Capabilities and Upgrading Human Rights to knowledge. Mansfield: Book Masters, 214–301.
Okyere-Manu, B. 2021. ‘Coronavirus: The Lion is attacking the Village’. https://beatriceokyere.com/post/coronavirus-the-lion-is-attacking-the-village. Accessed 4 February 2021.
Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed. London: Sage.
Public Health. 2020. (COVID-19 prevention, containment and treatment) (national lockdown) (amendment) order, 2020 (no. 5). Harare: Government of Zimbabwe. Available 7 February 2021, http://zimlii.org/zw/legislation/si/2020/99.
Ruben, A., and E. Babbie. 2010. Essential Research Methods for Social Work, 2nd ed. Brooks, CA: Cole Engage Learning.
Sande, N., and B. Maforo. 2021. ‘Pastoral Ministry from the Margins: Pastors’ Wives in Apostolic Faith Mission in Zimbabwe’. Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 47.2, 1–14.
Steiner, T.M. 2020. ‘Quarantine, loneliness and psalms’. HTS Theological Studies 76.1, 1–8.
Tapfumaneyi, R. 2021. ‘Zimbabwe: Top Cleric Calls on Congregants to Take Up Covid-19 Vaccination’. NewZimbabwe.com. file:///Users/tensonmuyambo/Desktop/Muyambo%20&%20Sande/Zimbabwe:%20Top%20Cleric%20Calls%20On%20Congregants %20to%20Take%20Up%20Covid-19%20Vaccination%20-%20allAfrica.com.web archive. Accessed 15 May 2021.
Wolff, H.W. 2002. Anthropologie des Alten Testaments. Gütersloh: Christian Kaiser.
YouTube. 2021. ‘Makandiwa on the coronavirus vaccination and mark of the beast’. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c83p_lTC4_8. Accessed 13 July 2021.
Zimbabwe Legal Information Institute. 2020. Public Health (COVID-19 prevention, containment and treatment) (national lockdown) (amendment) order, 2020 (no. 5). Harare: Government of Zimbabwe. Available 7 February 2021. http://zimlii.org/zw/legislation/si/2020/99.
ZIMSTAT. 2019. ‘Zimbabwe Coronavirus Cases. Updated 2012 population census projection report’. Woldometer. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/zimbabwe/. Accessed 8 February 2021.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 203 | 203 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 12 | 12 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 25 | 25 | 5 |
‘Continue to wash your hands, continue to wear your mask, continue to sanitize, continue to maintain social distance, and lastly continue to pray’. These were the closing remarks of a pastor who was preaching online to his congregants in the context of the second and third waves of COVID-19 variants. This article focuses on the church’s utilisation (or lack) of both religion and science under the ‘wash’ and ‘pray’ theology. The article raises this fundamental question: to what extent is the church embracing scientific knowledge in its efforts to deal with COVID-19? Data was collected through an online questionnaire survey, review of available literature, listening to clerics on YouTube, follow-up WhatsApp interviews, as well as overt and covert observations. The article argues that religion and science differ on a number of issues but in the context of COVID-19 and as indicated by this study, they must learn from each other and pool resources to combat COVID-19. COVID-19 calls for undivided attention, and when religion and science unify humanity vastly benefit. The article adds to the continuous debate on the relationship between science (wash) and religion (pray), arguing for the significance of religious ideas that make science effective in addressing the pandemic and vice versa.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 203 | 203 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 12 | 12 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 25 | 25 | 5 |