This special issue enquires into aesthetic ways of newly creating or re-shaping and re-presenting civil religion and its central characters, symbols, or figures. Normally, civil religion addresses value-orientation and social integration. In addition to these features, the papers make the aesthetic performance of civil religion the subject of discussion. The reason for taking this path is the altered aesthetic circumstances of highly mediatised and consumerist societies. Before this backdrop, images, literary figurations, movie sequences, and brands in media, public and national discourse are examined in various case studies from Italy, Finland, the uk, France, the former gdr, and Switzerland. At the same time, the negotiation and aesthetic plausibility of aesthetic styles, pragmatic power, and particular media logics are evaluated. The concept of civil religion deserves this closer re-definition also with respect to past and recent (post-)secularisation and non-religion discourses. Hopefully, this multi-layered analysis of aesthetics and aesthetic pragmatics of civil religion will shed some light on the persistent appropriateness of the ‘civil religion’ concept and its capacity to be introduced into various methodological contexts in combination with the aesthetic perspective.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bellah Robert N. , “Civil Religion in America,” Dædalus 96/1 (1976), 1–21.
Böckenförde Ernst-Wolfgang , Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1976).
Bonney Norman , , “The Sacred State: Religion, Ritual and πower in the United Kingdom,” in: Hjelm Titus (ed.), Is God Back? Reconsidering the New Visibility of Religion (London, etc.: Bloomsbury, 2015), 118–131.
Brunotte Ulrike , , “Religion und Kolonialismus,” in: Kippenberg Hans G. , , Rüpke Jörg , , & von Stuckrad Kocku (eds.), Europäische Religionsgeschichte. Ein mehrfacher Pluralismus. 2 vols. (Stuttgart: V&R/utb2009), vol. 1, 339–370.
Bungert Heike , , & Jana Wolf , “Die Debatte um ‘Zivilreligion’ in transnationaler Perspektive,” Zeithistorische Forschung/Studies in Contemporary History 7/3 (2010). http://www.zeithistorische-forschungen.de/16126041-Bungert-Weiss-3-2010(accessed 1 March 2017).
Forst Rainer , , & Klaus Günter , “Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen: Zur Idee eines interdisziplinären Forschungsprogramms,” Normative Orders Working Papers 1 (2010). www.normativorders.net(accessed 30 May 2016).
Furseth Inger , , “Civil Religion,” in: Segal Robert , & von Stuckrad Kocku (eds.), Vocabulary for the Study of Religion (Leiden: Brill, 2015), vol. 1, 241–245.
Giesen Bernhard , , “Die Religionsfreiheit und das dritte Projekt der Moderne,” in: Besier Gerhard (ed.), Die Religionsfreiheit und das Staat-Kirche-Verhältnis in Europa und den usa. Special issue of Religion – Staat – Gesellschaft 14/1 (2013), 97–108.
Grieser Alexandra , , “Erzählte Gemeinschaft: Zur Multi-Funktionalität kollektiver Narrative und der dynamischen Rolle von Religion,” in: Brahier Gabriele , & Johannsen Dirk (eds.), Konstruktionsgeschichten: Narrationsbezogene Ansätze in der Religionsforschung (Würzburg: Ergon, 2013), 319–333.
Grieser Alexandra , “Aesthetics,” in: Segal Robert , & von Stuckrad Kocku (eds.), Vocabulary for the Study of Religion (Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2016), vol. 1, 14–23.
Gumbrecht Hans Ulrich , “Notwendiges Übel? Donald Trumps Erfolg liegt am besonderen Staatsverständnis der Amerikaner,” die zeit 21, 12 May 2016, 38.
Hjelm Titus , “Understanding the New Visibility of Religion: Religion as Problem and Utility,” Journal of Religion in Europe 7/2 (2014), 203–222.
Knott Kim , , “The Secular Sacred: In-between or both/and?,” in: Day Abby , , Vincett Giselle , , & Cotter Christopher (eds.), Social Identities Between the Sacred and the Secular. ahrc/esrc Religion and Society Series (Farnham: Ashgate 2013), 145–160.
Knott Kim , , & Elizabeth Poole , Media Portrayals of Religion and the Secular Sacred: Representation and Change. ahrc/esrc Religion and Society Series (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013).
Künkler Mirjam , , & Tine Stein (eds.), Constitutional and Political Theory: Selected Writings by Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde, intro and annotations by idem (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).
Laustsen Carsten Bagge , “Studying Politics and Religion: How to Distinguish Religious Politics, Civil Religion, Political Religion, and Political Theology,” Journal of Religion in Europe 6/4 (2013), 428–463.
Lehmann Karsten , & Ulf Plessentin (eds.), Inverser Böckenförde – Leben Religionen von politischen Voraussetzungen, die sie selbst nicht garantieren können?/Inverted Böckenförde – Do Religions Depend on Political Conditions They Cannot Guarantee? Special issue of Religion – Staat – Gesellschaft 13.1 (2012), 7–170.
Nix Andreas , Zivilreligion und Aufklärung: Der zivilreligiöse Strang der Aufklärung und die Frage nach einer europäischen Zivilreligion. Region – Nation – Europa 71 (Münster: lit, 2012).
Pfahl-Traugbber Armin , , “‘Politische Religion’ und ‘Zivilreligion,’” in: Liedhegener Antonius , , Tunger-Zanetti Andreas , , & Wirz Stepahn (eds.), Religion, Wirschaft, Politik. Forschungszugänge zu einem aktuellen transdisziplinären Feld (Zürich: Pano, 2011), 223–249.
Preitschopf Alexandra , , “‘Nous sommes tous des Palestiniens’ – Palästina-Solidarität, Antizionismus und Antisemitismus im Zuge der Pro-Gaza-Proteste 2014 in Frankreich,” in: Embacher Helga (ed.), Der Gaza-Krieg 2014 und sein Widerhall in Europa: Pro-Palästina-Demonstrationen und Antisemitismus-Debatten. Special issue of Chilufim: Zeitschrift für Jüdische Kulturgeschichte18/1 (2015), 39–104.
Reckwitz Andreas , “Affective Spaces: A Praxeological Outlook,” Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice 16/2 (2012), 241–258.
Santoro Anthony , , “Unsilent Partners: Sports Stadiums and Their Appropriation and Use of Sacred Space,” in: Stievermann Jan , , Goff Philip , , & Junker Detlef (eds.), Religion and the Marketplace in the United States (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015),240–266.
Schnabel Annette , , “Religious Cleavages and National Identity in European Civil Societies,” in: Hjelm Titus (ed.), Is God Back? Reconsidering the New Visibility of Religion (London, etc.: Bloomsbury, 2015), 46–64.
Stolz Jörg , ., (Un)Believing in Modern Society: Religion, Spirituality, and Religious-Secular Competition (London: Routledge, 2016).
Carsten Bagge Laustsen, “Studying Politics and Religion: How to Distinguish Religious Politics, Civil Religion, Political Religion, and Political Theology,” Journal of Religion in Europe 6/4 (2013) 428–463, at 431.
Heike Bungert & Jana Wolf, “Die Debatte um ‘Zivilreligion’ in transnationaler Perspektive,” Zeithistorische Forschungen/Studies in Contemporary History 7/3 (2010) 1–4, at 3. http://www.zeithistorische-forschungen.de/16126041-Bungert-Weiss-3-2010 (accessed 1 March 2017).
Robert N. Bellah, “Civil Religion in America,” Dædalus 96/1 (1967), 1–21. For a critical analysis on these discursive patterns and the application to the North American indigenes, see Ulrike Brunotte, “Religion und Kolonialismus,” in: Hans G. Kippenberg, Jörg Rüpke, & Kocku von Stuckrad (eds.), Europäische Religionsgeschichte. Ein mehrfacher Pluralismus. 2 vols. (Stuttgart: V&R/utb 2009), vol. 1, 339–370.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 246 | 74 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 232 | 16 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 81 | 25 | 0 |
This special issue enquires into aesthetic ways of newly creating or re-shaping and re-presenting civil religion and its central characters, symbols, or figures. Normally, civil religion addresses value-orientation and social integration. In addition to these features, the papers make the aesthetic performance of civil religion the subject of discussion. The reason for taking this path is the altered aesthetic circumstances of highly mediatised and consumerist societies. Before this backdrop, images, literary figurations, movie sequences, and brands in media, public and national discourse are examined in various case studies from Italy, Finland, the uk, France, the former gdr, and Switzerland. At the same time, the negotiation and aesthetic plausibility of aesthetic styles, pragmatic power, and particular media logics are evaluated. The concept of civil religion deserves this closer re-definition also with respect to past and recent (post-)secularisation and non-religion discourses. Hopefully, this multi-layered analysis of aesthetics and aesthetic pragmatics of civil religion will shed some light on the persistent appropriateness of the ‘civil religion’ concept and its capacity to be introduced into various methodological contexts in combination with the aesthetic perspective.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 246 | 74 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 232 | 16 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 81 | 25 | 0 |