Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
This article analyzes a Finnish criminal court process concerning a spattering of blood on a mosque. Initially ruled as a religious insult, the charge was eventually dropped on the grounds that the Islamic community in question did not have the proper legal personality. The article utilizes a non-normative discursive perspective to analyze the construction of ‘sacredness’ and the category of ‘religion’ in the legal process. First, it is argued that several officials were influenced by the prevailing discourses on religion and blood, as well as the meaning of ‘sacred,’ to the point where they contradicted the prevalent legalistic discourse. Second, the legalistic discourse observed in the final ruling demonstrates how the prohibition of religious insult is part of the Finnish association-oriented model for managing a society perceived as religiously diverse.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aarnio Aulis , Tulkinnan taito: Ajatuksia oikeudesta, oikeustieteestä ja yhteiskunnasta (Helsinki: wsoy, 2006).
Äystö Tuomas , “Taidekohuista islamin kritiikkiin: Jumalanpilkka ja uskonrauhan rikkominen Suomessa 1960-luvulta nykypäivään,” in: Kouri Jaana (ed.), Näkyvä ja näkymätön uskonto (Turku: University of Turku, 2015), 181–207.
Äystö Tuomas , “Religious insult and blasphemy in contemporary Finland”, in: Temperman Jeroen & Koltay András (eds), Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression: Comparative, Theoretical and Historical Reflections after the Charlie Hebdo Massacre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 317–338.
Äystö Tuomas , “The Sacred Orders of Finnish Political Discourse on the Renewal of the Blasphemy Law,” Numen 64/2–3 (2017), 294–321.
Anttila Inkeri , “Trends in Criminal Law,” in: Dijk Jan van . (eds.), Criminal Law in Action: An Overview of Current Issues in Western Societies (Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1988), 37–38.
Anttonen Veikko , Ihmisen ja maan rajat: ‘Pyhä’ kulttuurisena kategoriana (Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 1996).
Anttonen Veikko , “The Sacred,” in: McCutcheon Russell T. & Braun Willi (eds.), Guide to the Study of Religion (London & New York: Cassell, 2000), 271–282.
Beaman Lori , “Deep Equality as an Alternative to Accommodation and Tolerance,” Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 27/2 (2014), 89–111.
Beckford James , Social Theory & Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Burr Vivien , Social Constructionism (Hove & New York: Routledge, 2003).
Christoffersen Lisbet , “Religious Entities as Legal Persons: Northern Europe (Nordic and Baltic Countries),” in: Friedner Lars (ed.), Churches and Other Religious Organizations as Legal Persons (Leuven: Peeters, 2007), 13–19.
Conley John M. , & O’Barr William M. , Just Words: Law, Language and Power (Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 2005).
Dean Mitchell , Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (London: Sage, 1999).
Doe Norman , Law and Religion in Europe: A Comparative Introduction (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).
Douglas Mary , Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (New York & London: Routledge, 2001 [1966]).
Durkheim Émile , The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1964 [1912]).
Edilex.fi. http://www.edilex.fi(accessed 2 March 2016).
Forsberg Tuomas , & Raunio Tapio , Politiikan muutos (Tampere: Vastapaino, 2013).
Foucault Michel , “Governmentality,” in: Burchell Graham . (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), 87–104.
Gozdecka Dorota A. , Religions and Legal Boundaries of Democracy in Europe: European Commitment to Democratic Principles (Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2009).
Grim Brian J. , “Laws Penalizing Blasphemy, Apostasy and Defamation of Religion are Widespread,” Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, 2012. http://www.pewforum.org/Government/Laws-Penalizing-Blasphemy,-Apostasy-and-Defamation-of-Religion-are-Widespread.aspx(accessed 2 March 2016).
Halme Miia , “Laki ja ihmisoikeudet: Etnografinen lähestymistapa,” Oikeus 36/1 (2007), 32–43.
Heikkonen Johannes , “Uskonnonvapaus ja valtion positiiviset toimintavelvoitteet,” ma thesis (Turku: University of Turku, 2010).
Hjelm Titus , “United in Diversity, Divided from Within: The Dynamics of Legitimation in Contemporary Witchcraft,” in: Hammer Olav & Stuckrad Kocku von (eds.), Polemical Encounters: Esoteric Discourse and Its Others (Leiden: Brill, 2007), 291–309.
Hjelm Titus , “Religion, Discourse and Power: A Contribution Towards a Critical Sociology of Religion,” Critical Sociology 40/6 (2013), 1–17.
Hodges Brian David , Kuper Ayelet , & Reeves Scott , “Discourse Analysis,” British Medical Journal 337 (2008), 570–572.
Hokka Jenni , ., “Suomalaiset sanomalehdet uskonnollisen maiseman tuottajina: Uskontojournalismi Helsingin Sanomissa, Ilkassa, Kalevassa ja Karjalaisessa vuosina 2007–2011,” Media & Viestintä 36/2 (2013), 6–21.
Joppke Christian , Citizenship and Immigration (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010).
Kääriäinen Kimmo , “Religion and State in Finland,” Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 24/2 (2011), 155–171.
Knott Kim , “Theoretical and Methodological Resources for Breaking Open the Secular and Exploring the Boundary Between Religion and Nonreligion,” Historia Religionum 2 (2010), 115–133.
Knott Kim , Poole Elisabeth , & Taira Teemu , Media Portrayals of Religion and the Secular Sacred: Representation and Change (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013).
Lappi-Seppälä Tapio , & Niemi Hannu , Seuraamusjärjestelmä 2015: Kontrollijärjestelmä tilastojen ja tutkimusten valossa (Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2016).
Larsen Signe Engelbreth , “Towards the Blasphemous Self: Constructing Societal Identity in Danish Debates on the Blasphemy Provision in the Twentieth and Twenty-first Centuries,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40/2 (2014), 194–211.
Leeuwen Theo Van , Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Lynch Gordon , The Sacred in the Modern World: A Cultural Sociological Approach (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).
Maasilta Mari , Rahkonen Juho , & Raittila Pentti , Islam suomalaisissa joukkoviestimissä (Tampere: University of Tampere, 2008).
Majanen Martti , “rl 17: Rikokset yleistä järjestystä vastaan,” in: Heinonen Olavi (ed.), Rikosoikeus (Helsinki: wsoy Lakitieto, 2002), 671–704.
Martikainen Tuomas , “The Governance of Islam in Finland,” Temenos 43/2 (2007), 243–265.
Martikainen Tuomas , Religion, Migration and Settlement: Reflections on Post-1990 Immigration to Finland (Leiden: Brill, 2013).
Martikainen Tuomas , “Multilevel and Pluricentric Network Governance of Religion,” in: Martikainen Tuomas & Gauthier François (eds.), Religion in the Neoliberal Age: Political Economy and Modes of Governance (London & New York: Routledge, 2016), 129–142.
McCutcheon Russell T. , Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion (New York: State University of New York Press, 2001).
McCutcheon Russell T. , “‘They Licked the Platter Clean’: On the Co-dependency of the Religious and the Secular,” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 19/3–4 (2007), 173–199.
Ministry of Justice, The Criminal Code of Finland. http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1889/en18890039(accessed 2 March 2016).
Nelkin Dorothy , “Cultural Perspectives on Blood,” in: Feldman Erica A. & Bayer Ronald (eds.), Blood Feuds: Aids, Blood, and the Politics of Medical Disaster (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 273–293.
Neuvonen Riku , “Kommentaari,” in: Neuvonen Riku (ed.), Vihapuhe Suomessa (Helsinki: Edita, 2015), 15–135.
Nuotio Kimmo , “Kulttuurien kohtaaminen rikosoikeudessa,” Oikeus 39/2 (2010), 138–145.
Owen Suzanne , & Taira Teemu , “The Category of ‘Religion’ in Public Classification: Charity Registration of the Druid Network in England and Wales,” in: Stack Trevor , Goldenberg Naomi R. , & Fitzgerald Timothy (eds.), Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty (Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2015), 90–114.
Patent and Registration Office. https://www.prh.fi/en/yhdistysrekisteri/uskonnolliset_yhdyskunnat/lyhennysote_uskonnonvapauslaista.html(accessed 2 March 2016).
Peutere Laura , Poliisin tietoon tullut viharikollisuus Suomessa 2008, Poliisiammattikorkeakoulun raportteja 85/2009 (Tampere: Poliisiammattikorkeakoulu, 2009).
Peutere Laura , “Rasistinen motiivi rangaistuksen koventamisperusteena: Tutkimus Helsingissä vuonna 2008 poliisin tietoon tulleista rikosepäilyistä,” Oikeus 39/4 (2010), 350–368.
Peutere Laura , & Kääriäinen Juha , “Racist Crimes in the Finnish Criminal Justice System: Analysis of Cases Reported to the Police in Helsinki in 2006,” European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 18/3 (2010), 261–279.
Pitkänen Pirkko , Etninen ja kulttuurinen monimuotoisuus viranomaistyössä (Helsinki: Edita, 2006).
Pyykkönen Miikka , Järjestäytyvät diasporat: Etnisyys, kansalaisuus, integraatio ja hallinta maahanmuuttajien yhdistystoiminnassa (Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto, 2007).
Richardson John E. , Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis (Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
Rosen Lawrence , Law as Culture: An Invitation (Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2006 [1941]).
Ruuskanen Minna , “Tuomioistuinratkaisut diskurssianalyysin kohteena,” in: Niemi-Kiesiläinen Johanna . (eds.), Oikeuden tekstit diskursseina (Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers’ Association, 2006), 43–60.
Saarela Anna , “Uskonnollisten loukkausten kriminalisointi erityisesti sananvapauden näkökulmasta,” Helsinki Law Review 1 (2011), 37–64.
Sakaranaho Tuula , “Religious Education in Finland,” Temenos 49/2 (2013), 225–254.
Smith Jonathan Z. , Relating Religion: Essays in the Study of Religion (London: University of Chicago Press, 2004).
Stuckrad Kocku von , “Discursive Study of Religion: Approaches, Definitions, Implications,” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 25/1 (2013), 5–25.
Sullivan Winnifred , “Law,” in: Segal Robert A. & Stuckrad Kocku von (eds.), Vocabulary for the Study of Religion (Leiden: Brill, 2015), vol. 2, 373–377.
Suomenlaki.com. http://suomenlaki.com(accessed 2 March 2016).
Sutela Mika , Arbitrium an decisio: Oikeudellisen päätöksenteon yhtenäisyys yleisissä tuomioistuimissa (Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland, 2016).
Taira Teemu , “Religion as a Discursive Technique: The Politics of Classifying Wicca,” Journal of Contemporary Religion 25/3 (2010), 379–394.
Taira Teemu , “Making Space for Discursive Study in Religious Studies,” Religion 43/1 (2013), 26–45.
Taira Teemu , “The Category of ‘Invented Religion’: A New Opportunity for Studying Discourses on ‘Religion,’” Culture and Religion 14/4 (2013), 477–493.
Taira Teemu , Pehmeitä kumouksia: Uskonto, media, nykyaika (Turku: Eetos, 2015).
Toivanen Reetta , “Vähemmistöt oikeuksiensa paineessa,” Tieteessä tapahtuu 23/4 (2005), 5–9.
Toivanen Reetta , “Tarinoita yhdenvertaisuudesta: Valta ja vähemmistöt antropologisen tutkimuksen kohteena,” Oikeus 41/2 (2012), 271–277.
Tonkis Frank , “Discourse Analysis,” in: Seale Clive (ed.), Researching Society and Culture (London: Sage, 2012), 405–408.
Venice Commission, cdl-ad(2008)026add2: European Commission For Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) Annexe ii. Analysis of the Domestic Law Concerning Blasphemy, Religious Insult and Inciting Religious Hatred in Albania, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Greece, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Turkey, United Kingdom on the Basis of Replies to a Questionnaire (Council of Europe, 2008).
Vihavainen Jonna , “Vihapuheen uhrikategoriat rasistisia rikoksia ja viharikoksia koskevan sääntelyn valossa,” ma thesis (Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2015).
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 255 | 37 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 188 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 21 | 1 | 0 |
This article analyzes a Finnish criminal court process concerning a spattering of blood on a mosque. Initially ruled as a religious insult, the charge was eventually dropped on the grounds that the Islamic community in question did not have the proper legal personality. The article utilizes a non-normative discursive perspective to analyze the construction of ‘sacredness’ and the category of ‘religion’ in the legal process. First, it is argued that several officials were influenced by the prevailing discourses on religion and blood, as well as the meaning of ‘sacred,’ to the point where they contradicted the prevalent legalistic discourse. Second, the legalistic discourse observed in the final ruling demonstrates how the prohibition of religious insult is part of the Finnish association-oriented model for managing a society perceived as religiously diverse.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 255 | 37 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 188 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 21 | 1 | 0 |