This article analyzes positions and arguments in editorials from Swedish newspapers during the period of 1976–2010 regarding the place of religion in modern, democratic society. Starting from Habermas’ call for changes in European political discourse in a post-secular situation, the article analyzes whether signs of ‘complementary learning processes’ can be found in the editorials, where alternatives to a secularist understanding of religion are expressed. Findings suggest that mediatization through increased politicization of the daily press contributes to a re-articulation of the former secularist discourse in Swedish editorials. A salient theme in this alternative discourse is the tension between religious freedom and other citizen rights.
HjarvardStig, “Religion og Politik i mediernes offentlighet,” in: ChristoffersenLisbeth (ed.), Gudebilleder: Ytringsfrihet og religion I en globalisert verden (Köpenhamn: Tiderne Skifter Forlag, 2006), 44–71.
HjarvardStig, “Three Forms of Mediatized Religion: Changing the Public Face of Religion,” in: HjarvardStig & LövheimMia (eds.), Mediatization and Religion: Nordic Perspectives (Göteborg: Nordicom, 2012), 21–44.
LövheimMia, & LindermanAlf, “Media, Religion and Modernity: Editorials and Religion in Swedish Daily Press,” in: HjelmTitus (ed.), Is God Back? Reconsidering the New Visibility of Religion (London: Bloomsbury, 2015), 32–45.