The Hijab Debate in the Norwegian Press: Secular or Religious Arguments?

in Journal of Religion in Europe
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Do religious debaters challenge the secular public sphere? This article is an analysis of the largest religion related debate in Norway: the debate about the hijab and the use of religious symbols in the public sphere. The article is empirically founded on the debates in 2009 that began with the question about to which degree the hijab could become part of the Norwegian police uniform for those who would wish to use it. The analysis is mainly centred on the arguments of the hijab wearers: to what degree is their religious motivation translated into a secular language? The empirical examination will show that Muslim debaters arguments can be characterized by a striking absence of references to religious concepts, and a just as striking use of secular ones. The article suggests that the lack of religious argumentation is an expression of an Islamic secularism rather than a result of a translation process. The hijab wearer's arguments are presented in the light of John Rawls’ and Jürgen Habermas’ thoughts about the need for translation—and its price.

Sections
References
  • An-NaimA. A. (2008): Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of ShariaLondon: Harvard University Press.

  • AsadT. (1993): Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons for Power in Christianity and IslamLondon: John Hopkins University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aftenposten (årgang 2004 2009).

  • BangstadS. (2009): Sekularismens ansikterOslo: Universitetsforlaget.

  • BarliA.H. (2009): Hijab I norsk offentlighet – en diskursanalyseMasteroppgave i Religion og samfunnDet teologiske fakultet ved Universitetet i Oslo.

  • BetzH.G.MeretS. (2009): “Revisiting Lepanto: The Political Mobilization Against Islam in Contemporary Western-Europe” I Patterns of Prejudice43:3313334.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BorchgrevinkT. (2007): “The Hijab Debate and the Liberal Dilemma” I Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning nr. 2.

  • CasanovaJ. (1994): Public Religions in the Modern WorldChicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Dagbladet (årgang 2004 2009).

  • Dagsavisen (årgang 2004 2009).

  • EspositoJ. (1992): The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality?New York: Oxford University Press.

  • EspositoJ. LMogahedD. (2007): Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think: Based on Gallup's World Poll The Largest Study of its KindNew York: Gallup Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fritt Ord Foundation (Website): http://www.fritt-ord.no/no/hjem/mer/tale_ved_overrekkelsen_av_fritt_ords_pris_2010/.

  • Habermas J. (2005): “Religion in the Public Sphere” in the seminar report Religion in the Public Sphere the Holberg prize Seminar 2005.

  • HabermasJ. (2008): Between Naturalism and ReligionCambridge: Polity Press.

  • Hijabbrigaden (website): http://www.hijab-brigaden.net/.

  • IMDI (Directorate of Integration and Diversity) Annual Report 2009: Immigrants in the Norwegian Media: Media Created Fear of Islam and Invisible Daily Life.” www.imdi.no/aarsrapport2009.

  • JacobsenC. M. (2006): Staying on the Straight Path: Religious Identity Among Young Muslims in Norway dissertation for dr. polit. University of Bergen.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klassekampen (årgang 2004 2009).

  • KlausenJ. (2005): The Islamic Challenge: Politics and Religion in Western EuropeOxford: Oxford University Press.

  • LewisB. (1993): Islam in History: Ideas People and Events in the Middle EastChicago: Open Court.

  • LewisB. og Buntzie E. C. (2009): Islam: The Religion and the PeopleUpper Saddle River, N.J.: Wharton School Pub.

  • LindholmT. (2005): “Challenging Habermas on the Moral Legitimacy of Religious Voices in Democratic Politics: Why Overlapping Justifications of Human Rights may Leave Secularist Worries Uncalled-For,” The Holberg Prize Seminar 2005Religion in the Public Space.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norsk Rikskringkasting NRK Redaksjon 21.

  • RamadanT. (2009): Europeisk islam: Å være muslim I vestenOslo: Cappelen Damm.

  • RawlsJ. (1971): A Theory of JusticeCambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • RawlsJ. (1993): Political LiberalismColombia: University Press.

  • SicakkanH.G.LihmanY.G. (2006): What Happens When a Society is Diverse? Exploring Multidimensional IdentitiesNew York: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Retriever Research A-tekst Version 5.5.21 - Retriever AB - ret-web03.retriever.no.

  • Verdens Gang (VG) (årgang 2004 2009).

  • Vårt Land (årgang 2004 2009).

  • WeithmanP. J. (2002): Religion and the Obligations of CitizenshipCambridge: University Press.

  • 4)

    Rawls J. (1993): Political Liberalism Colombia: University Press.

  • 5)

    Habermas J. (2008): Between Naturalism and Religion Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • 34)

    Tordis Borchgrevink (2007) discusses amongst other things this question in the article: “The Hijab Debate and the Liberal Dilemma” I Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning nr. 2.

  • 35)

    Rawls J. (1993): Political Liberalism Colombia: University Press.

  • 36)

    Rawls 1993.

  • 37)

    Rawls J. (1971): A Theory of Justice Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • 38)

    Bangstad on Rawls 200962.

  • 39)

    Rawls 1993. Adherence to universal human rights is an example of an overarching consensus in terms of the fact that many Christians Muslims and Humanists agree on these even if they have different motivations for it (Bangstad 2009 64).

  • 40)

    Rawls 1993217.

  • 41)

    Habermas J. (2008): Between Naturalism and Religion Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • 42)

    Habermas 2008.

  • 43)

    Habermas 200515.

  • 46)

    Weithman 2002.

  • 47)

    Habermas 200517.

  • 51)

     See Esposito J. (1992): The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? New York: Oxford University Press or Ramadan T. (2009): Europeisk islam: Å være muslim i Vesten Oslo: Cappelen Damm.

  • 52)

    Asad T. (1993): Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons for Power in Christianity and Islam London: John Hopkins University Press or Lewis B. and Buntzie E. C. (2009): Islam: The Religion and the People Upper Saddle River N.J.: Wharton School Pub.

  • 53)

    Esposito J. L and Mogahed D. (2007): Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think: Based on Gallup's World Poll The Largest Study of its Kind New York: Gallup Press.

  • 54)

    An-Naim A. A. (2008): Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Sharia London: Harvard University Press; Ramadan T. (2009): Europeisk islam: Å være muslim I vesten Oslo: Cappelen Damm.

  • 55)

    Klausen J. (2005): The Islamic Challenge: Politics and Religion in Western Europe Oxford: Oxford University Press; Jacobsen C. M. (2006): Staying on the Straight Path: Religious Identity Among Young Muslims in Norway dissertation for dr. polit. University of Bergen; Sicakkan H.G. and Lihman Y.G. (2006): What Happens When a Society is Diverse? Exploring Multidimensional Identities New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 69 59 9
Full Text Views 120 120 1
PDF Downloads 12 12 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0