Agents, Armies, Allies: Semantics of Public-Private Partnerships in US Welfare Reform
In: Journal of Religion in EuropeSearch for other papers by Alexander-Kenneth Nagel in
Current site
Google Scholar
Global competition and demographic change have put modern welfare states under pressure. To ensure budget consolidation without too harsh a retrenchment of benefits, privatization and competition have become white hopes in the social-political debate. As states are courting civil society to take over responsibility in the realm of social welfare, they create opportunity structures for religious communities to re-enter the public sphere. While it has become fashionable to announce the resurgence of religion in heroic diagnoses of the world order, little attention has been given to what is going on below on the meso-level of public-private collaboration between religious and non-religious organizations. In this article I will examine US welfare reform as a strong case of privatization and communalization of welfare responsibility, which involves an explicit invitation to religious communities to join in as public social service providers. I will argue for a religious studies perspective to religion and social politics that focuses on the semantic patterns of the political discourse and explore the guiding semantics of public-private partnerships from the initial Charitable Choice legislation under the Clinton government to George W. Bush’s Faith-based Initiative and finally to the New Era of Partnerships announced by Barack Obama.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Advisory Council, White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships, “A New Era of Partnerships,” report of recommendations to the President (Washington, D.C., 2010), http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ofbnp-council-final-report.pdf, 2010 (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
Beisheim Marianne, Fit für Global Governance?: Transnationale Interessengruppenaktivitäten als Demokratisierungspotential—Am Beispiel Klimapolitik (Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 2004).
-
Berger Peter L., The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion (New York: Double Day, 1967).
-
“The Desecularization of the World: A Global Overview,” in: idem (ed.), The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religions and World Politics (Michigan: Eerdmans, 1999), 1–18.
-
Böckenförde Ernst-Wolfgang, Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit: Studien zur Staatstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1976).
-
Boorstein Michelle, & William Wan, “Religious Leaders Worry that Obama’s Faith Council Is for Show,” Washington Post, 3 February 2010.
-
Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 US (1988), http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/487/589/ (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
Büchs Milena, New Governance in European Social Policy: The Open Method of Coordination (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
-
Bush George W., “The Duty of Hope,” presidential campaign speech (1999), http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2010/07/today-in-texas-history-gw-bush-delivers-first-presidential-campaign-speech/ (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
Carlson-Thies Stanley, “Charitable Choice: Bringing Religion Back into American Welfare,” Journal of Policy History 13/1 (2001), 109–132.
-
“Faith-Based Initiative 2.0: The Bush Faith-Based and Community Initiative,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 32/3 (2009), 931–947.
-
Casanova José, Public Religions in the Modern World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).
-
Chaves Mark, “Religious Congregations and Welfare Reform: Who Will Take Advantage of ‘Charitable Choice’?,” American Social Review 64/1 (1999), 836–846.
-
Chaves Mark, & William Tsitsos, “Congregations and Social Services: What They Do, How They Do It, and with Whom,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30/1 (2001), 660–682.
-
Chaves Mark, & Bob Wineburg, “Did the Faith-Based Initiative Change Congregations?,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39/2 (2010), 343–355.
-
Churchill Mary, “In Bad Faith? Possibilities and Perils in the Age of Faith-Based Initiatives,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 70/4 (2002), 843–853.
-
Dieteman David, “Faith-Based Government Programs: A Deal with the Devil,” http://www.lewrockwell.com/dieteman/dieteman67.html (accessed 27 December 2012).
-
DuBois Joshua, “A Vision for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships,” speech to the Brookings Institution (Washington, D.C.: 2009), http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/02/18/a-vision-faith-based-and-neighborhood-partnerships (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
Esping-Andersen Gøsta, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990).
-
Etzioni Amitai, The Common Good (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004).
-
Gabriel Karl, Religiöse Wurzeln und Konturen des deutschen Wohlfahrtsstaatsmodells (Berlin: ICEP, 2009).
-
Geller Ari, & Samantha Friedman, “Coalition Against Religious Discrimination,” letter to President Obama from the Interfaith Alliance, http://www.interfaithalliance.org/news/349-coalition-against-religious-discrimination-letter-to-president-obama (accessed 27 December 2012).
-
Genschel Philipp, , Stephan Leibfried, , & Bernhard Zangl, “Der Zerfasernde Staat: Vom Wandel des Subjekts Moderner Politik,” Vorgänge 47/2 (2008), 4–13.
-
Genschel Philipp, & Bernhard Zangl, “Metamorphosen des Staates: Vom Herrschaftsmonopolisten zum Herrschaftsmanager,” Leviathan 36/3 (2008), 430–454.
-
Goldstein Judith, & Keohane Robert O., “Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework,” in: idem (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press, 1993), 3–30.
-
Graf Friedrich Wilhelm, Die Wiederkehr der Götter: Religion in der Modernen Kultur, 2nd ed. (München: Beck, 2004).
-
Green John C., & Sherman Amy L., “Fruitful Collaborations: A Survey of Government-Funded Faith-Based Programs in 15 States,” press conference co-sponsored by the Hudson Institute and the Center for Public Justice at the National Press Club (Charlottesville: 2002).
-
Habermas Jürgen, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001).
-
Hindu American Seva Communities, “Our Mission,” http://www.hinduamericanseva.org/aboutus/mission (accessed 27 December 2012).
-
“President Obama Recognizes Hindu American Seva,” http://www.odysseynetworks.org/news/2011/10/31/president-obama-recognizes-hindu-american-seva (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
Horne Christopher S., , van Slyke David M., , & Johnson Janet L., “Charitable Choice Implementation: What Public Managers Should Know About Public Opinion and the Potential Impact of Government Funding on Private Giving,” International Journal of Public Administration 29/10–11 (2006), 819–836.
-
Hunt v. McNair, 413 US 743 (1973), http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/413/734/case.html (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
Huntington Samuel P., The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1998).
-
Jacobsen Janet R., & Alpert Rebecca T., “Faith Based on What? A Roundtable Discussion,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 70 (2002), 821–832.
-
Juergensmeyer Mark, Global Rebellion: Religious Challenges to the Secular State, from Christian Militias to Al Qaeda (Comparative Studies in Religion and Society), vol. 16 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008).
-
Katz Michael B., In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America (New York: BasicBooks, 1996).
-
Kaufmann Franz-Xaver, Religion und Modernität: Sozialwissenschaftliche Analysen (Tübingen: Mohr, 1989).
-
Kippenberg Hans G., , “Diskursive Religionswissenschaft: Gedanken zu einer Religionswissenschaft, die weder auf einer allgemein gültigen Definition von Religion noch auf einer Überlegenheit von Wissenschaft basiert,” in: Burkhard Gladigow, & Kippenberg Hans G. (eds.), Neue Ansätze in der Religionswissenschaft (München: Kösel, 1983), 9–28.
-
Kippenberg Hans G., & von Stuckrad Kocku, Einführung in die Religionswissenschaft. Gegenstände und Begriffe (München: Beck, 2003).
-
Knoblauch Hubert, Populäre Religion: Auf dem Weg in eine spirituelle Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 2009).
-
Lepsius M. Rainer, , “Institutionenanalyse und Institutionenpolitik,” in: Brigitta Nedelmann (ed.), Politische Institutionen im Wandel, Sonderheft 35 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (Opladen: Leske&Budrich, 1995), 392–403.
-
Luckmann Thomas, Die Unsichtbare Religion (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991).
-
Lupu Ira C., & Tuttle Robert W., “Developments in the Faith-Based and Community Initiatives: Comments on Notices of Proposed Rulemaking and Guidance Document” (Albany: Rockefeller Institute of Government, 2003).
-
Manow Philip, & van Kersbergen Kees, “Religion and the Western Welfare State: The Theoretical Context,” in: idem (eds.), Religion, Class Coalitions, and Welfare States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 1–38.
-
Meyer John W., , Boli John, , & Thomas George M., , “Ontologie und Rationalisierung im Zurechnungssystem der westlichen Kultur,” in: Georg Krücken (ed.), Weltkultur: Wie die westlichen Prinzipien die Welt durchdringen (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2005), 17–46.
-
Minow Martha, “Public and Private Partnerships: Accounting for the New Religion,” Harvard Law Review 116/1 (2003), 1229–1270.
-
Nagel Alexander-Kenneth, “Public Religion and State Transformation: Zero-Sum Game or Fruitful Partnership?,” Journal of Religion in Europe 3/3 (2010), 323–349.
-
Obama Barack H., “Call to Renewal” (Washington, D.C.: 2006), http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/11/obamas-historic-call-to-renewa.html (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
“Speech on Faith-based Organizations” (Zanesville: 2008), http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/07/obamas_speech_on_faithbased_or.html (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
“A New Beginning” (Cairo: 2009), http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/04/AR2009060401117.html (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
Olasky Marvin, The Tragedy of American Compassion (Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, 1992).
-
Pew Research Center, “Faith-Based Programs Still Popular, Less Visible,” results from the 2009 Annual Religion and Public Life Survey (Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center, 2009).
-
“Media Coverage of the Faith-Based Initiative in the First Six Months of 2001 and 2009,” http://www.pewforum.org/Social-Welfare/The-Starting-Line.aspx (accessed 27 December 2012).
-
Plaskow Judith, “Whose Initiative? Whose Faith?,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 70/4 (2002), 863–867.
-
Pries Ludger, Die Transnationalisierung der sozialen Welt: Sozialräume jenseits von Nationalgesellschaften (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2008).
-
Pulliam Sarah, & Olsen Ted, “Q & A: Barack Obama,” Christianity Today, 23 January 2008, http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2008/januaryweb-only/104-32.0.html (accessed 27 December 2012).
-
Quadagno Jill, & Deana Rohlinger, , “The Religious Factor in U.S. Welfare State Politics,” in: van Kersbergen Kees, & Manow Philip (eds.), Religion, Class Coalitions, and Welfare States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 236–266.
-
Riesebrodt Martin, Die Rückkehr der Religionen. Fundamentalismus und der “Kampf der Kulturen” (München: Beck, 2000).
-
Rosenthal Marguerite, “Faith-Based Social Services and the Role of the State,” paper presented at the Spring Research Conference (Washington, D.C., 2003).
-
Smith Steven R., & Sosin Michael R., “The Varieties of Faith-Related Agencies,” Public Administration Review 61/6 (2001), 651–670.
-
Thomas Scott, The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: The Struggle for the Soul of the Twenty-First Century (Culture and Religion in International Relations) (Houndmills & Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005).
-
Wallace Anthony, Religion: An Anthropological View (New York: Random House, 1966).
-
Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 62 (1985), http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/472/38/case.html (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
White House Office of Faith-based and Community Initiatives, “Guidance to Faith-Based and Community Organizations on Partnering with the Federal Government,” http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/fbnp/pdfs/GuidanceDocument.pdf (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships, “About the President’s Advisory Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships,” http://www.white-house.gov/administration/eop/ofbnp/about/council (accessed 27 December 2012).
-
Wineburg Bob, Faith-Based Inefficiency: The Follies of Bush’s Initiative (Westport: Präger, 2007).
-
Zürn Michael, , Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates: Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance, ed. Ulrich Beck, , Moderne Zweite edition (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998).
-
Zürn Michael, , Leibfried Stephan, , Zangl Bernhard, , & Peters Bernhard, “Transformations of the State?,” Transtate working papers (Bremen: Transtate Research Center, 2004).
-
1)
Amitai Etzioni, The Common Good (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004), 3.
-
2)
Anthony Wallace, Religion: An Anthropological View (New York: Random House, 1966), 265.
-
3)
Peter L. Berger, The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion (New York: Double Day, 1967); Thomas Luckmann, Die unsichtbare Religion (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991).
-
5)
Hubert Knoblauch, Populäre Religion: Auf dem Weg in eine spirituelle Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 2009).
-
6)
Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1998), 91–94.
-
7)
Martin Riesebrodt, Die Rückkehr der Religionen: Fundamentalismus und der “Kampf der Kulturen” (München: Beck, 2000); Friedrich Wilhelm Graf, Die Wiederkehr der Götter: Religion in der modernen Kultur, 2nd ed. (München: Beck, 2004).
-
8)
Scott Thomas, The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: The Struggle for the Soul of the Twenty-First Century (Houndmills & Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005).
-
9)
Mark Juergensmeyer, Global Rebellion: Religious Challenges to the Secular State, from Christian Militias to al Qaeda (Comparative Studies in Religion and Society), vol. 16 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008).
-
11)
Jürgen Habermas, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001).
-
12)
Marianne Beisheim, Fit für Global Governance?: Transnationale Interessengruppenaktivitäten als Demokratisierungspotential—am Beispiel Klimapolitik (Opladen: Leske&Budrich, 2004), 60.
-
14)
Stanley Carlson-Thies, “Charitable Choice: Bringing Religion Back into American Welfare,” Journal of Policy History 13/1 (2001), 109–132.
-
15)
Michael B. Katz, In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America (New York: BasicBooks, 1996), 242.
-
17)
Franz-Xaver Kaufmann, Religion und Modernität: Sozialwissenschaftliche Analysen (Tübingen: Mohr, 1989); Karl Gabriel, Religiöse Wurzeln und Konturen des deutschen Wohlfahrtsstaatsmodells (Berlin: ICEP, 2009); Philip Manow & Kees van Kersbergen, “Religion and the Western Welfare State: The Theoretical Context,” in: idem (eds.), Religion, Class Coalitions, and Welfare States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 1–38.
-
18)
José Casanova, Public Religions in the Modern World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).
-
20)
Alexander-Kenneth Nagel, “Public Religion and State Transformation: Zero-sum Game or Fruitful Partnership?,” Journal of Religion in Europe 3/3 (2010), 323–349.
-
29)
Gøsta Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990), 38–41.
-
32)
Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 62 (1985), http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/472/38/case.html (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
34)
Marvin Olasky, The Tragedy of American Compassion (Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, 1992), 210.
-
37)
Mary Churchill, “In Bad Faith? Possibilities and Perils in the Age of Faith-Based Initiatives,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 70/4 (2002), 843–853; Janet R. Jacobsen & Rebecca T. Alpert, “Faith Based on What? A Roundtable Discussion,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 70.4 (2002), 821–832.
-
40)
Bob Wineburg, Faith-Based Inefficiency: The Follies of Bush’s Initiatives (Westport: Präger, 2007), 63–67.
-
43)
Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 US (1988), http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/487/589/ (accessed 31 January 2013).
-
45)
Hunt v. McNair, 413 US 743 (1973), http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/413/734/case.html (accessed 31 January 2013), emphasis added.
-
50)
Stanley Carlson-Thies, “Faith-Based Initiative 2.0: The Bush Faith-Based and Community Initiative,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 32/3 (2009), 931–941, here 933.
-
64)
Sarah Pulliam & Ted Olsen, “Q & A: Barack Obama,” Christianity Today, 23 January 2008. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2008/januaryweb-only/104-32.0.html (accessed 27 December 2012).
-
69)
Judith Plaskow, “Whose Initiative? Whose Faith?,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 70/4 (2002), 863–867.
-
71)
Milena Büchs, New Governance in European Social Policy: The Open Method of Coordination (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 354 | 42 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 66 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 27 | 4 | 0 |
Agents, Armies, Allies: Semantics of Public-Private Partnerships in US Welfare Reform
In: Journal of Religion in EuropeSearch for other papers by Alexander-Kenneth Nagel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Global competition and demographic change have put modern welfare states under pressure. To ensure budget consolidation without too harsh a retrenchment of benefits, privatization and competition have become white hopes in the social-political debate. As states are courting civil society to take over responsibility in the realm of social welfare, they create opportunity structures for religious communities to re-enter the public sphere. While it has become fashionable to announce the resurgence of religion in heroic diagnoses of the world order, little attention has been given to what is going on below on the meso-level of public-private collaboration between religious and non-religious organizations. In this article I will examine US welfare reform as a strong case of privatization and communalization of welfare responsibility, which involves an explicit invitation to religious communities to join in as public social service providers. I will argue for a religious studies perspective to religion and social politics that focuses on the semantic patterns of the political discourse and explore the guiding semantics of public-private partnerships from the initial Charitable Choice legislation under the Clinton government to George W. Bush’s Faith-based Initiative and finally to the New Era of Partnerships announced by Barack Obama.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 354 | 42 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 66 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 27 | 4 | 0 |