The Disenchantment of Problems: Musings on a Cognitive Turn in Intellectual History

in Journal of Religion in Europe
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This article responds to Hans Kippenberg's, Willem Drees's, and Ann Taves's commentaries on my book, The Problem of Disenchantment. It presents an overview of the key arguments of the book, clarifies its use of Problemgeschichte to reconceptualize Weber's notion of disenchantment, and discusses issues in the history and philosophy of science and religion. Finally, it elaborates on the use of recent cognitive theory in intellectual history. In particular, it argues that work in event cognition can help us reframe Weber's interpretive sociology and deepen the principle of methodological individualism. This helps us get a better view of what the ‘problems’ of Problemgeschichte really are, how they emerge, and why some of them may reach broader significance.

The Disenchantment of Problems: Musings on a Cognitive Turn in Intellectual History

in Journal of Religion in Europe

Sections

References

AspremEgil. The Problem of Disenchantment: Scientific Naturalism and Esoteric Discourse 1900–1939. Leiden: Brill2014.

AspremEgil. “How Schrödinger’s Cat became a Zombie: The Epidemiology of Science-Based Representations in Popular and Religious Contexts.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religionin press.

DreesWillem B. Religion Science and Naturalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1996)

EddingtonArthur. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1928.

ElsterJon. “The Case for Methodological Individualism.” Theory and Society 11/4 (1982) 453482.

GerthHans H. and Wright MillsC.. “Introduction: The Man and His Works.” In idem (trans. eds.) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology376. New York: Oxford University Press1946.

Larson Jr. James R. “Evidence for a Self-Serving Bias in the Attribution of Causality.” Journal of Personality 45/4 (1977) 430441.

McCauleyRobert. Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press2011.

RadvanskyGabriel A. and ZacksJeffreyEvent Cognition (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press2014).

SchumpeterJoseph. “On the Concept of Social Value.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 23 (1908–1909) 213232.

SgarbiMarco. “Concepts vs. Ideas vs. Problems: Historiographical Strategies in Writing History of Philosophy.” In PozzoRiccardo and SgarbiMarco (eds.) Begriffs- Ideen- und Problemgeschichte im 21. Jahrhundert6980. Wiesebaden: Harrassowitz Verlag2011.

SørensenJesper. “Past Minds: Present Historiography and Cognitive Science.” In MartinLuther H. and SørensenJesper (eds.) Past Minds: Studies in Cognitive Historiography 179–193. London and Oakville: Equinox2011.

TavesAnn and AspremEgil. “Experience as Event: Event Cognition and the Study of (Religious) Experience.” Religion Brain and Behavior (In press).

TenbruckFriedrick H.The Problem of Thematic Unity in the Works of Max Weber.” The British Journal of Sociology 31/3 (1980) 316351.

WeberMax. Economy and Society. Edited by RothGuenther and WittichClaus translated by E. Fischoff et al. Berkeley: University of California Press1978.

WilsonDeirdre and SperberDan. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.1986.

5

AspremThe Problem of Disenchantment19.

10

AspremThe Problem of Disenchantment317–373.

13

Arthur EddingtonThe Nature of the Physical World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1928) 350.

17

Willem B. DreesReligion Science and Naturalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1996).

18

 See AspremThe Problem of Disenchantment291–298.

24

WeberEconomy and Society6.

25

 See especially AspremThe Problem of Disenchantment556–60.

27

AspremThe Problem of Disenchantment29; quote from Marco Sgarbi "Concepts vs. Ideas vs. Problems: Historiographical Strategies in Writing History of Philosophy" in Riccardo Pozzo and Marco Sgarbi (eds.) Begriffs- Ideen- und Problemgeschichte im 21. Jahrhundert (Wiesebaden: Harrassowitz Verlag 2011) 69–80 76.

29

Robert McCauleyWhy Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press2011).

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 29 29 8
Full Text Views 86 86 63
PDF Downloads 6 6 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0