Considering the presence of interfaith activities outside the religious sphere, this paper raises the question of a correlation between space and interfaith interaction, and proposes an analytical scheme for the analysis of the spatiality of (interfaith) interaction. Using the example of an interfaith tour in the Hamburg Art Gallery and based on a spatial and interaction theory framework, the paper focuses on three dimensions in which space is expressed and correlated with interaction. First, is space as an element of the social situation’s definition, this includes a synthesised picture of the gallery. Secondly, the activity structures affect the (spatial) positioning between the participants and space is reproduced in interaction. The third dimension refers to the material space, especially the artwork and its function in interaction.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Blumer Herbert , “What is wrong with social theory?” American Sociological Review 18 (1954), 3–10.
Geertz Clifford , Dichte Beschreibung: Beiträge zum Verstehen kultureller Systeme (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1987), 7–43. [English original: The Interpretation of Cultures. Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books, 1973), 3–30.].
Goffman Erving , Rahmen-Analyse: Ein Versuch über die Organisation von Alltagserfahrungen (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1996 4). [English original: Frame Analysis, An Essay on the Organization of Experience (New York/Evanston/San Francisco/London: Harper & Row, 1974).].
Goffman Erving , Interaktionsrituale: Über Verhalten in direkter Kommunikation (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1999 5). [English original: Interaction Ritual. Essay on Face-to-Face Behavior (New York: Doubleday & Company, 1967).].
Goffman Erving , Wir alle spielen Theater: Die Selbstdarstellung im Alltag (München: Piper Verlag, 2011 9). [English original: The presentation of Self in Everyday Life (New York: Doubleday & Company, 1959).].
Knott Kim , The Location of Religion: A Spatial Analysis (Durham: Acumen, 2013).
Koch Marion (ed.), Auf Augenhöhe: Interreligiöse Gespräche über Kunst (Petersberg: Imhof Verlag, 2013).
Löw Martina , Raumsoziologie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2012 7).
Löw Martina , , Streets Silke , & Stoetzer Sergej , Einführung in die Stadt- und Raumsoziologie (Stuttgart: utb Verlag, 2008 2).
Nagel Alexander-Kenneth , , “Vernetzte Vielfalt: Religionskontakt in interreligiösen Aktivitäten,” in Nagel Alexander-Kenneth (ed.), Diesseits der Parallelgesellschaft: Neuere Studien zu religiösen Migrantengemeinden in Deutschland . (Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2013), 241–268.
Kim Knott, The Location of Religion: A Spatial Analysis (Durham: Acumen, 2013), 21.
Herbert Blumer, “What is wrong with social theory?” American Sociological Review 18 (1954), 7.
cf. Clifford Geertz, Dichte Beschreibung: Beiträge zum Verstehen kultureller Systeme (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1987), 16.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 300 | 44 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 169 | 12 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 52 | 22 | 2 |
Considering the presence of interfaith activities outside the religious sphere, this paper raises the question of a correlation between space and interfaith interaction, and proposes an analytical scheme for the analysis of the spatiality of (interfaith) interaction. Using the example of an interfaith tour in the Hamburg Art Gallery and based on a spatial and interaction theory framework, the paper focuses on three dimensions in which space is expressed and correlated with interaction. First, is space as an element of the social situation’s definition, this includes a synthesised picture of the gallery. Secondly, the activity structures affect the (spatial) positioning between the participants and space is reproduced in interaction. The third dimension refers to the material space, especially the artwork and its function in interaction.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 300 | 44 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 169 | 12 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 52 | 22 | 2 |