Save

Biblical Exegesis and Systematic Theology

Toward Mutual Benefit

In: Journal of Reformed Theology
Authors:
Arnold Huijgen Theologische Universiteit Apeldoorn The Netherlands Apeldoorn

Search for other papers by Arnold Huijgen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-1780
,
Koert van Bekkum Evangelische Theologische Faculteit Leuven Belgium Leuven

Search for other papers by Koert van Bekkum in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1119-7051
, and
Hans Burger Theologische Universiteit Kampen The Netherlands Kampen

Search for other papers by Hans Burger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7399-1509
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

Notwithstanding the legitimate distinction between biblical studies and systematic theology, these disciplines can and should benefit from each other. On the one hand, biblical studies deals with texts that make claims about God that are read primarily in a liturgical context by people with a faith commitment. Accordingly, while the distantiation of an academic approach is helpful, a systematic theological dimension enriches the otherwise rather naturalistic biblical studies. On the other hand, systematic theology needs biblical studies. Historical Christian theology shows that abstract theology without engagement with biblical studies becomes arid. Current emphases on history, language, narrative, and Israel offer opportunities to connect the two disciplines. This article sketches a methodology for the mutual benefit of biblical studies and systematic theology.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 690 690 20
Full Text Views 65 65 1
PDF Views & Downloads 165 165 3