Save

Memory, Orality, and the Fourth Gospel

A Response to Paul Foster with Further Comments for Future Discussion

In: Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
Authors:
Stanley E. Porter
Search for other papers by Stanley E. Porter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Hughson T. Ong McMaster Divinity College, Canada, porters@mcmaster.ca; hughsonong@yahoo.com

Search for other papers by Hughson T. Ong in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

This article examines and responds to the arguments made by Paul Foster in a recent article in jshj regarding social-memory theory, orality, and the Fourth Gospel, where he argues that recent research in these areas are dead-ends for historical Jesus research. We do not necessarily wish to defend the research he criticizes, but we respond to Foster by pointing out some of the limitations in his analysis and provide further comments to move discussion of these research areas forward. Our comments address his assumption that form- and redaction-criticism accomplish the purposes that he envisions for historical Jesus research and a number of other problematic arguments he raises regarding each of these areas.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 290 42 3
Full Text Views 260 9 1
PDF Views & Downloads 118 21 2