Save

What Are The Odds?

The Jesus Seminar’s Quest for Objectivity

In: Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
View More View Less
  • 1 Associate Professor, Defense Analysis Department, Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, ca, sfeverto@nps.edu
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

In 1985 a group of New Testament scholars, who came to be known as the Jesus Seminar, gathered to vote on the authenticity of the sayings of Jesus. Although the Seminar argued that it followed objective rules of evidence, critics have claimed that it did not. This paper investigates these claims using statistical models to evaluate the Seminar’s own voting records. It finds that although the Seminar’s Fellows did follow widely accepted criteria, they were also influenced by their own assumptions about who Jesus was. In particular, they appear to have assumed that Jesus was a non-apocalyptic enfant terrible who spoke in aphorisms and parables and occasionally uttered things that later embarrassed the early Church.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 225 62 1
Full Text Views 197 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 25 6 0