Jesus and the Pathetic Wicked
Re-visiting Sanders’s View of Jesus’ Friendship with Sinners
In: Journal for the Study of the Historical JesusSearch for other papers by Mark Allan Powell in
Current site
Google Scholar
The proposal of E. P. Sanders that Jesus promised the kingdom to sinners without requiring them to repent has been rejected by most scholars but is here revived in a modified form. Sanders’s essential proposal may be outlined as a series of ten propositions, only one of which seems completely preposterous. This last point, however, may also appear quite reasonable if we remember that many of the persons regarded as sinners in Jesus’s context would have been slaves or, at least, people who lived in such dire straits that they were not able to do the things that would have qualified as repentance in the minds of most religious people of the day (including Jesus). Two examples of such people are considered: tax collectors and prostitutes. The article concludes that Jesus probably did promise the kingdom to some tax collectors and prostitutes who due to their social situation were unable to amend their lives in the manner he would otherwise have required.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
17
See Richard A. Horsley, Jesus and the Spiral of Violence: Popular Jewish Resistance in Roman Palestine (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987). Horsley fails to note (as does Sanders) that most of the tax collectors with whom Jesus would have fraternized would have been low-level thugs who were themselves victims of Roman domination. But for a position somewhat compatible with Horsley’s, see W.O. Walker, ‘Jesus and the Tax Collectors’, jbl 97 (1978), pp. 221–38.
-
33
Schottroff and Stegemann, Jesus and the Hope of the Poor, p. 13.
-
34
Schottroff and Stegemann, Jesus and the Hope of the Poor, pp. 11–12.
-
36
Jennifer A. Glancy, Slavery in Early Christianity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 129. See also Allen Dwight Callahan, Richard A. Horsley and Abraham Smith (eds.), Slavery in Text and Interpretation (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 2001); J. Albert Harrill, Slaves in the New Testament: Literary, Social, and Moral Dimensions (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2006).
-
40
Gerhard Lenski, Power and Privilege (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966), esp. pp. 189–296.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 372 | 80 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 222 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 50 | 4 | 0 |
Jesus and the Pathetic Wicked
Re-visiting Sanders’s View of Jesus’ Friendship with Sinners
In: Journal for the Study of the Historical JesusSearch for other papers by Mark Allan Powell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The proposal of E. P. Sanders that Jesus promised the kingdom to sinners without requiring them to repent has been rejected by most scholars but is here revived in a modified form. Sanders’s essential proposal may be outlined as a series of ten propositions, only one of which seems completely preposterous. This last point, however, may also appear quite reasonable if we remember that many of the persons regarded as sinners in Jesus’s context would have been slaves or, at least, people who lived in such dire straits that they were not able to do the things that would have qualified as repentance in the minds of most religious people of the day (including Jesus). Two examples of such people are considered: tax collectors and prostitutes. The article concludes that Jesus probably did promise the kingdom to some tax collectors and prostitutes who due to their social situation were unable to amend their lives in the manner he would otherwise have required.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 372 | 80 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 222 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 50 | 4 | 0 |
