Stanley Porter and Andrew Pitts, ‘Critical Realism in Context: N.T. Wright’s Historical Method and Analytic Epistemology,’ Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 13 (2015), pp. 276–306.

 Stanley Porter and Andrew Pitts, ‘Critical Realism in Context: N.T. Wright’s Historical Method and Analytic Epistemology,’ Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 13 (2015), pp. 276–306.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Porter and Pitts, ‘Critical Realism,’ pp. 277–287.

 Porter and Pitts, ‘Critical Realism,’ pp. 277–287.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Porter and Pitts, ‘Critical Realism,’ p. 276.

 Porter and Pitts, ‘Critical Realism,’ p. 276.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Cf. Lonergan, Method, pp. 203–208; Ben F. Meyer, The Aims of Jesus (repr. ed.; Eugene, or: Pickwick Publications, 2002), 84–94; Ben F. Meyer, Critical Realism and the New Testament (Allison Park, pa: Pickwick Publications, 1989), pp. 157–172. For a recent overview of Collingwood, with specific concern with historical Jesus studies, cf. Jordan Ryan, “Jesus at the Crossroads of Inference and Imagination,” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 13 (2015), pp. 66–89.

 Cf. Lonergan, Method, pp. 203–208; Ben F. Meyer, The Aims of Jesus (repr. ed.; Eugene, or: Pickwick Publications, 2002), 84–94; Ben F. Meyer, Critical Realism and the New Testament (Allison Park, pa: Pickwick Publications, 1989), pp. 157–172. For a recent overview of Collingwood, with specific concern with historical Jesus studies, cf. Jordan Ryan, “Jesus at the Crossroads of Inference and Imagination,” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 13 (2015), pp. 66–89.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 R.G. Collingwood, The Idea of History (rev. ed.; ed. Jan van der Dussen; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 1.

 R.G. Collingwood, The Idea of History (rev. ed.; ed. Jan van der Dussen; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 1.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Meyer, Aims of Jesus, pp. 13–16.

 Meyer, Aims of Jesus, pp. 13–16.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Porter and Pitts, ‘Critical Realism,’ p. 288. One is somewhat surprised to see no attention given to McPartland’s work on Lonergan’s philosophy of history. Cf. Thomas A. Partland, Lonergan and Historiography: The Epistemological Philosophy of History (Columbia, mo: University of Missouri Press, 2010); Thomas A. Partland, Lonergan and the Philosophy of Historical Existence (Columbia, mo: University of Missouri Press, 2001).

 Porter and Pitts, ‘Critical Realism,’ p. 288. One is somewhat surprised to see no attention given to McPartland’s work on Lonergan’s philosophy of history. Cf. Thomas A. Partland, Lonergan and Historiography: The Epistemological Philosophy of History (Columbia, mo: University of Missouri Press, 2010); Thomas A. Partland, Lonergan and the Philosophy of Historical Existence (Columbia, mo: University of Missouri Press, 2001).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Porter and Pitts, ‘Critical Realism,’ p. 292.

 Porter and Pitts, ‘Critical Realism,’ p. 292.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Cf. Meyer, Critical Realism and the New Testament, pp. 17–56; Ben F. Meyer, Reality and Illusion in New Testament Scholarship: A Primer in Critical Realist Hermeneutics (Collegeville, mn: Michael Glazier, 1994), pp. 90–101. And before the reader cries foul at the spectre of the intentional fallacy, please read Meyer’s explanation of why his understanding of the intended sense of the text is not an example of said fallacy, in Critical Realism and the New Testament, p. 20, and Reality and Illusion, pp. 94–99.

 Cf. Meyer, Critical Realism and the New Testament, pp. 17–56; Ben F. Meyer, Reality and Illusion in New Testament Scholarship: A Primer in Critical Realist Hermeneutics (Collegeville, mn: Michael Glazier, 1994), pp. 90–101. And before the reader cries foul at the spectre of the intentional fallacy, please read Meyer’s explanation of why his understanding of the intended sense of the text is not an example of said fallacy, in Critical Realism and the New Testament, p. 20, and Reality and Illusion, pp. 94–99.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Collingwood, Idea of History, p. 244.

 Collingwood, Idea of History, p. 244.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Meyer, Reality and Illusion, pp. 2–3.

 Meyer, Reality and Illusion, pp. 2–3.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Cf. Lonergan, Method, pp. 81–85. Also, with specific reference to the development of Christian dogma, a matter not without relevance for the study of the historical Jesus, the discussion in Bernard J.F. Lonergan, The Triune God: Doctrines (ed. Robert M. Doran and H. Daniel Monsour; trans. Michael G. Shields; Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan 11; Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009), pp. 31–55.

 Cf. Lonergan, Method, pp. 81–85. Also, with specific reference to the development of Christian dogma, a matter not without relevance for the study of the historical Jesus, the discussion in Bernard J.F. Lonergan, The Triune God: Doctrines (ed. Robert M. Doran and H. Daniel Monsour; trans. Michael G. Shields; Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan 11; Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009), pp. 31–55.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Lonergan, Method, p. 19.

 Lonergan, Method, p. 19.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Porter and Pitts, ‘Critical Realism,’ p. 301.

 Porter and Pitts, ‘Critical Realism,’ p. 301.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation