Save

Are the Parables Still the Bedrock of the Jesus Tradition?

In: Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
Author:
Klyne Snodgrass North Park Theological Seminary, Chicago, United States, ksnodgrass@northpark.edu

Search for other papers by Klyne Snodgrass in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The parables of Jesus have long been considered the most reliable access to authentic teaching of Jesus. This conviction has been challenged recently by John Meier, who argues only four parables can confidently be assigned to Jesus, but Meier’s method is faulty and his conclusion unacceptable. I argue Jesus’ parables are the place we can be most confident about his teaching. There are reasons to be less suspicious of the tradition behind the Gospels and more suspicious of assumptions about authenticity criteria and the assured results of our discipline. The principle of multiple attestation, on which Meier relies heavily, is not a trustworthy criterion. The correlation of parabolic and nonparabolic material increases confidence about what Jesus taught. Further, no one was telling narrative parables like Jesus’ parables—certainly not in the church and not in early rabbinic parables. If Jesus did not tell these parables, who did?

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 463 76 16
Full Text Views 283 13 0
PDF Views & Downloads 197 29 0