Save

Q, Memory and Matthew: A Response to Alan Kirk

In: Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
Author: Mark Goodacre1
View More View Less
Online Publication Date:
11 Dec 2017
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95
Add to Cart

Other access options

Rent on DeepDyve
Redeem Access Token

It is testimony to the resilience of the Q hypothesis, and to the determination of its defenders, that in spite of recent attacks, it is still generating thoughtful, rigorous and stimulating studies like Q in Matthew,1 Alan Kirk’s long awaited follow-up to his 1998 study, The Composition of the Sayings Source.2 But where that study focused on Q as text, this one focuses on Q as source. Kirk explores how Matthew appropriated the Q source in his gospel, bringing insights from studies of ancient media to argue that Matthew’s use of Q
Title:
Q, Memory and Matthew: A Response to Alan Kirk
Article Type:
Research Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1163/17455197-01502005
Language:
English
Pages:
224–233
In:
Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
In:
Volume 15: Issue 2-3
Publisher:
Brill
E-ISSN:
1745-5197
Print ISSN:
1476-8690
Subjects:
New Testament & Early Christian Writings, Biblical Studies, Religion in Antiquity, Religious Studies, Ancient History, Classical Studies

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 317 74 2
Full Text Views 373 6 2
PDF Views & Downloads 138 14 2