Save

Why Name Popularity is a Good Test of Historicity

A Goodness-of-Fit Test Analysis on Names in the Gospels and Acts

In: Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
Authors:
Luuk van de Weghe Independent scholar, Port Angeles, WA, USA

Search for other papers by Luuk van de Weghe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Jason Wilson Department of Math and Computer Science, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, USA

Search for other papers by Jason Wilson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Are name statistics in the Gospels and Acts a good test of historicity? Kamil Gregor and Brian Blais, in a recent article of the jshj, argue that the sample of name occurrences in the Gospels and Acts is too small to be determinative and that several statistical anomalies weigh against a positive verdict. Unfortunately, their conclusions result directly from improper testing and questionable data selection. Chi-squared goodness-of-fit testing establishes that name occurrences in the Gospels and Acts fit into their historical context at least as well as those in the works of Josephus. Additionally, they fit better than occurrences derived from ancient fictional sources and occurrences from modern, well-researched historical novels.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 166 166 46
Full Text Views 15 15 4
PDF Views & Downloads 121 121 39