Evangelical Christians and Historical-Jesus Studies: Final Reflections

in Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article presents an overall response to critical essays and ensuing discussion on the part of prominent historical-Jesus scholars regarding whether and how evangelical Christians can engage in such study in a manner that will be approved by the guild at large. It critiques arguments put forward by evangelical scholars Darrell Bock and Craig Keener as historically unpersuasive but nevertheless contends that their work meets the guild's standards of legitimacy in a manner that deserves a fair hearing. It supports Robert Miller and AmyJill Levine's contention that historical research must be able to yield negative results to have integrity, but picks up on a point by Robert Webb to suggest that such negative results may be defined methodologically ('this cannot be verified') rather than ontologically ('this did not happen').

Evangelical Christians and Historical-Jesus Studies: Final Reflections

in Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus

Sections

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 21 21 9
Full Text Views 4 4 4
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0