Save

Why Does R. Akiba Acclaim Bar Kokhba as Messiah?

In: Journal for the Study of Judaism
Author:
Matthew Novenson Biblical Studies Department, Princeton Theological Seminary 46 Mercer St., Princeton, NJ 08542, USA;, Email: matthew.novenson@ptsem.edu

Search for other papers by Matthew Novenson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€37.40€34.95 excl. VAT

Abstract

Peter Schäfer has argued that the name of R. Akiba is secondary to y. Ta'an. 4:8/27, in which R. Akiba is said to have acclaimed Bar Kokhba as messiah. Some interpreters have countered, however, that rabbinic haggadah would not attribute such an embarrassing position to R. Akiba if he had not held it. In response to both these arguments, I propose that the R. Akiba-Bar Kokhba tradition fits a pattern of talmudic stories about the Second Revolt in which the rabbis are anachronistically cast in a position of influence. This tradition is an example of a late antique literary topos attested in Jewish, Christian, and pagan sources in which a founder of a minority movement is remembered as having conversed with a contemporary world leader. In short, both Schäfer and his critics are right: R. Akiba was not originally part of the tradition preserved in y. Ta'an. 4:8/27, but there is a compelling tradition-historical rationale for inserting him there.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 596 84 15
Full Text Views 250 13 0
PDF Views & Downloads 207 28 1