Save

The Vitality of Scripture Within and Beyond the “Canon”1

In: Journal for the Study of Judaism
Author:
Hindy Najman Yale University Department of Religious Studies & The Program in Judaic Studies, Yale University, 451 College Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8287, USA USA hindy.najman@yale.edu

Search for other papers by Hindy Najman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Challenging divisions between canonical and marginal texts, this essay critically evaluates the borrowing of the term “canon” from an Athanasian context and offers alternatives for thinking about the formation of scriptural authority in ancient Judaism. This essay focuses on the vitality of scripture as a corrective to scholarship which emphasizes canon, library, and prophetic cessation. To understand the authority of scripture is to understand scripture’s vitality in Ancient Judaism and, if the term “canon” is used, it should be used in a way that reflects this vitality.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 838 147 17
Full Text Views 401 40 0
PDF Views & Downloads 515 119 3