This article analyses the migration of rabbinic narrative traditions between the land of Israel and Babylonia and examines plot transformations in these narratives in order to illustrate the cultural differences between these two centers of rabbinic thought. In particular, I explore the positioning of women as an internal Other and the construction of a rabbinic, masculine identity that is distinct from the masculine identity of the common, unlearned man. I will look at some brief, entertaining stories about a few rabbinic sages and their interactions with unnamed women and unidentified unlearned men.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Clifford Geertz, Negara: The Theater State in Nineteenth-Century Bali (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980), 136.
See Virginia Burrus, Begotten Not Made: Conceiving Manhood in Late Antiquity (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000).
See Mark Masterson, “Studies in Ancient Masculinity,” in A Companion to Greek and Roman Sexualities, ed. Thomas K. Hubbard (Oxford: Blackwell, 2014), 18-28. I have to mention here that Daniel Boyarin in chapters 2-4 of Unheroic Conduct, which address rabbinic literature and rabbinic ideas about Torah study, advances a thesis very much like mine, although he stresses more rabbinic self-positioning in contrast to Roman ideals of masculinity rather than in contrast to other internal, Jewish concepts of masculinity. My work is therefore a continuation and further development of Boyarin’s thesis.
See Lee I. Levine, “The Sages and the Synagogue in Late Antiquity: The Evidence of the Galilee,” The Galilee in Late Antiquity, ed. Lee I. Levine (New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1992), 201-22, esp. 206-7.
See Daniel Boyarin, Carnal Israel: Reading Sex in Talmudic Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), 187-88 and see Galit Hasan-Rokem, “Rabbi Meir, The Illuminated and Illuminating,” Current Trends in the Study of Midrash, ed. Carol Bakhos JSJSup 106 (Leiden: Brill, 2006), 227-43, esp. 236.
See Shmuel Safrai, In the Days of the Temple and in the Days of the Mishnah: Studies in the History of Israel (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1994), 159-68 [Hebrew]. See also Bernadette J. Brooten, Women Leaders in the Ancient Synagogue: Inscriptional Evidence and Background Issues (Missoula, mt: Scholars Press, 1982), 35-40, 57-94, 139-41 and cf. the skeptical view of Chad Spiegel, “Reconsidering the Question of Separate Seating in Ancient Synagogues,” jjs 63 (2012): 62-83, esp. 73-74, of whose arguments I am not fully convinced.
See Frank W. Nicolson, “The Saliva Superstition in Classical Literature,” HSP 8 (1897): 2-40, esp. 24. Leor Halevi, Muhammad’s Grave: Death Rites and the Making of Islamic Society (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007), 111, 290 n.105; Karl Krumbacher, ed., Der heilige Georg in der griechischen Überlieferung (Munich: Verlag der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1911), 10 (line 15) and 24 (line 30). All these cases have been comparatively studied by Adam Bursi, Holy Spit and Magic Spells: Religion, Magic, and the Body in Late Ancient Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (PhD diss., Cornell University, 2015), 103-78. I thank him for sharing with me his work before it was submitted.
See Ido Hevroni, “The Midrash as Marriage Guide,” Azure 29 (2007): 103-20, esp. 111-12.
For the textual version see Hershler, The Babylonian Talmud, 2:172.
See William Hansen, Anthology of Ancient Greek Popular Literature (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998), 107-10.
As proposed by Stein, “The Untamable Stew,” 250. The lamp has a certain sexual connotation. Indeed, the translation of “gourds” to “lamps” expresses somewhat the mood of the woman, probably feeling deprived of her husband’s love. Interestingly, lamps appear in the story from the Palestinian Talmud, too; see Stein, “The Untamable Stew,” nn. 34-36 and Hasan-Rokem, “Rabbi Meir.”
See Carlin A. Barton, The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), 168-72.
See Victor Turner, The Ritual Process: Structure and Antistructure (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977), 94-203.
See Masterson, “Studies of Ancient Masculinity,” 22. Mark D. Stansbury-O’Donnell, “Desirability and the Body,” in Companion, 31-53 argues that virtus designates manhood or manliness as aggressive courage in martial endeavor; see also Boyarin, Unheroic Conduct, 94-99.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 285 | 56 | 6 |
Full Text Views | 239 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 93 | 4 | 1 |
This article analyses the migration of rabbinic narrative traditions between the land of Israel and Babylonia and examines plot transformations in these narratives in order to illustrate the cultural differences between these two centers of rabbinic thought. In particular, I explore the positioning of women as an internal Other and the construction of a rabbinic, masculine identity that is distinct from the masculine identity of the common, unlearned man. I will look at some brief, entertaining stories about a few rabbinic sages and their interactions with unnamed women and unidentified unlearned men.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 285 | 56 | 6 |
Full Text Views | 239 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 93 | 4 | 1 |