The categories of Jewish historiography of the Second Temple Period frame how scholars and their students approach crucial texts of this era and therefore shape our understanding of history. Yet, these categories are fraught with difficulties. This article explores this issue by examining Daniel R. Schwartz’s categorization of Second Temple historiography as either Palestinian or diasporan works. While these categories provide interesting insights, they also leave far too many exceptions. This article demonstrates that such efforts of categorization warp our understanding of Second Temple historiography. Rather than categorize Second Temple historiography I suggest that each work ought to be considered from the point of view of its author’s aims.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Amir, Y. “Philo’s Version of Pilgrimage to Jerusalem.” In Jerusalem in the Second Temple Period: Abraham Schalit Memorial Volume, ed. Aaron Oppenheimer, Uriel Rappaport, and Menahem Stern (Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi, 1980), 154–165 [Hebrew].
Attridge, Harold W. “Jewish Historiography.” In Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period, ed. Michael E. Stone (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984), 157–184.
Attridge, Harold W. “Josephus and His Works.” In Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period, ed. Michael E. Stone (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984), 185–232.
Birnbaum, Ellen. “Allegorical Interpretation and Jewish Identity Among Alexandrian Jewish Writers.” In Neotestamentica et Philonica: Studies in Honor of Peder Borgen, ed. David Edward Aune, Torrey Seland and Jarl Henning Ulrichsen (Leiden: Brill, 2003), 307–329.
Buell, Denise Kimber. Why This New Race: Ethnic Reasoning in Early Christianity (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005).
Collins, John J. Between Athens and Jerusalem: Jewish Identity in the Hellenistic Diaspora (New York: Crossroad, 1983).
den Hollander, William. Josephus, the Emperors, and the City of Rome: From Hostage to Historian (Leiden: Brill, 2014).
Doran, Robert. Temple Propaganda: The Purpose and Character of 2 Maccabees (Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 1981).
Fox, A. “Aspects of the Jewish Rebellion in the years 115–117 CE.” In Jewish Rebellions in the Time of Trajan, ed. David Rokeach (Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center, 1978), 203–211 [Hebrew].
Gafni, Isaiah M. “Josephus and I Maccabees.” In Josephus, the Bible, and History, ed. Louis H. Feldman and Gohei Hata (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1989), 116–131.
Gruen, Erich S. Diaspora: Jews amidst Greeks and Romans (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002).
Halpern-Amaru, B. “Land Theology in Philo and Josephus.” In The Land of Israel: Jewish Perspectives, ed. L.A. Hoffman (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986), 65–93.
Hengel, Martin. Judaism and Hellenism (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1974).
Horbury, William. The Jewish War under Trajan and Hadrian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).
Leonhardt-Balzer, Jutta. Jewish Worship in Philo of Alexandria (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001).
Mason, Steve. “Of Audience and Meaning: Reading Josephus’ Bellum Judaicum in the Context of a Flavian Audience.” In Josephus and Jewish History in Flavian Rome and Beyond, ed. Joseph Sievers and Gaia Lembi (Leiden: Brill, 2005), 75–100.
Mason, Steve. “The Priest Josephus Away from the Temple: A Changed Man?” Revue de Qumran 103 (2014), 375–402.
Mason, Steve. A History of the Jewish War A.D. 66–74 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).
Pearce, Sarah. “Jerusalem as ‘Mother-City’ in the Writings of Philo of Alexandria.” In Negotiating Diaspora: Jewish Strategies in the Roman Empire, ed. John M.G. Barclay (London: T&T Clark, 2004), 19–36.
Philo. Philo: in ten volumes, trans. Francis H. Colson, George Herbert Whitaker, and Ralph Marcus (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1929–1962).
Philo. On the Life of Moses, trans. Francis H. Colson (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1929).
Philo. Special Laws, trans. Francis H. Colson (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1937).
Rajak, Tessa. “The Against Apion and the Continuities in Josephus’ Political Thought.” In The Jewish Dialogue Between Greece and Rome: Studies in Cultural and Social Interaction, ed. Tessa Rajak (Leiden: Brill, 2002), 195–217.
Schürer, Emil. Geschichte des jüdischen Volkes im Zeitalter Jesu Christi, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1886–1890.)
Schwartz, Daniel R. “Temple or City: What did Hellenistic Jews See in Jerusalem?” In The Centrality of Jerusalem, ed. M. Poorthuis and Ch. Safrai (Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1996), 114–127.
Schwartz, Daniel R. “From the Maccabees to Masada: On Diasporan Historiography of the Second Temple Period.” In Jüdische Geschichte in hellenistisch-römischer Zeit: Schriften des historischen Kollegs, herausgegeben von der Stiftung Historisches Kolleg, ed. Aharon Oppenheimer with Elisabeth Müller-Luckner (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1999), 29–40.
Schwartz, Daniel R. “The Jews of Egypt between the Temple of Onias, the Temple of Jerusalem, and Heaven.” In Center and Diaspora: The Land of Israel and the Diaspora in the Second Temple, Mishna and Talmud Periods, ed. Isaiah M. Gafni (Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center, 2004), 37–55 [Hebrew].
Schwartz, Daniel R. The Second Book of Maccabees: Introduction, Hebrew Translation and Commentary (Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi, 2004) [Hebrew].
Schwartz, Daniel R. “Philo, His Family, and His Times.” In The Cambridge Companion to Philo, ed. Adam Kamesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 9–31.
Schwartz, Daniel R. Reading the First Century: On Reading Josephus and Studying Jewish History of the First Century (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013).
Sterling, Gregory E. Historiography and Self-Definition: Josephos, Luke-Acts, and Apologetic Historiography (Leiden: Brill, 1992).
Tuval, Michael. From Jerusalem Priest to Roman Jew: On Josephus and the Paradigms of Ancient Judaism (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013).
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 218 | 21 | 1 |
Full Text Views | 200 | 6 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 80 | 22 | 3 |
The categories of Jewish historiography of the Second Temple Period frame how scholars and their students approach crucial texts of this era and therefore shape our understanding of history. Yet, these categories are fraught with difficulties. This article explores this issue by examining Daniel R. Schwartz’s categorization of Second Temple historiography as either Palestinian or diasporan works. While these categories provide interesting insights, they also leave far too many exceptions. This article demonstrates that such efforts of categorization warp our understanding of Second Temple historiography. Rather than categorize Second Temple historiography I suggest that each work ought to be considered from the point of view of its author’s aims.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 218 | 21 | 1 |
Full Text Views | 200 | 6 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 80 | 22 | 3 |