Rabbinic literature is concerned with lineage when determining appropriate marital partners. For the rabbis, not all Jews may marry all other Jews. Some Jews have a lower lineage status and may only marry others of similar status. Scholars have assumed that the Amoraim of Babylonia were more stringent towards matters of lineage than their Palestinian counterparts. However, the talmudic sources themselves do not neatly fit with this dichotomy. Additionally, this generalization does not capture the variety of ways that the Amoraim perceived lineage. In this article, I propose a shift of focus towards the different terminologies and discourses in Amoraic sources, which provide a richer understanding of the ways in which they viewed genealogy, and wished to shape it. These terminologies reflect different ways in which the rabbis constructed the idea of a Jewish people, and its components.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Albeck, Hanoch. Shisha Sidrei Mishna, Seder Nashim (Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 1959).
Albeck, Hanoch. “Ha-Nissuʾin be-Yamim Kadmonim.” Torah Shebeʿalpeh 3 (1961), 9-16.
Bar-Ilan, Meir. “The Attitude towards Mamzerim in Jewish Society in Antiquity.” Jewish History 14 (2000), 125-170.
Baron, Salo W. A Social and Religious History of the Jews, 2nd ed., 2 vols. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1952).
Boyce, Mary, and Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan Ibn Isfandiyā The Letter of Tansar (Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, 1968).
Büchler, Adolf. “Familienreinheit und Familienmakel in Jerusalem vor dem Jahre 70.” In Festschrift Adolf Schwarz zum Siebzigsten Geburstage, ed. Victor Aptowitzer and Samuel Krauss (Berlin: Löwit, 1917), 133-162.
Cohen, Shaye J.D. “The Rabbi in Second Century Jewish Society.” In The Cambridge History of Judaism, vol. 3, ed. William Horbury, W.D. Davies, and John Sturdy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 922-990.
Cohen, Shaye J.D. “Some Thoughts on ‘The Attitude towards Mamzerim in Jewish Society in Antiquity.’” Jewish History 14 (2000), 171-174.
Epstein, Louis M. Marriage Laws in the Bible and the Talmud (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1942).
Epstein, Jacob N. Mevoʾot le-Sifrut ha-Tanaʾim (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1957).
Friedman, Shamma Y. “Ha-Baraitot ba-Talmud ha-Bavli ve-Yahassan le-Makbilotehen she-ba-Tosefta.” In Atara l’Haim: Studies in the Talmud and Medieval Rabbinic Literature in Honor of Professor Haim Zalman Dimitrovsky, ed. Daniel Boyarin, Shamma Friedman, Marc Hirshman, Menahem Schmelzer, and Israel M. Ta-Shma (Jerusalem: Magnes, 2000), 163-201.
Gafni, Isaiah M. “Shevet u-Mehokek: Al Defusei Manhigut Hadashim bi-Tkufat ha-Talmud be-Eretz Yisrael u-be-Bavel.” In Priesthood and Monarchy: Studies in the Historical Relationships of Religion and State, ed. Isaiah Gafni and Gabriel Motzkin (Jerusalem: Shazar Center, 1987), 79-91.
Gafni, Isaiah M. “Expressions and Types of ‘Local Patriotism’ among the Jews of Sasanian Babylonia.” Irano-Judaica 2 (1990), 63-71.
Gafni, Isaiah M. The Jews of Babylonia in the Talmudic Era: A Social and Cultural History (Jerusalem: Shazar Center, 1990) [Hebrew].
Garnsey, Peter. “Legal Privilege in the Roman Empire.” Past and Present 41 (1968), 3-24.
Garnsey, Peter. “Why Penalties Become Harsher: The Roman Case, Late Republic to Fourth Century Empire.” Natural Law Forum 13 (1968), 141-162.
Hayes, Christine E. Gentile Impurities and Jewish Identities (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002).
Herman, Geoffrey. “Babylonia of Pure Lineage: Notes on Babylonian Jewish Toponymy Based on Early Textual Witnesses of the Talmud.” In Sources and Interpretation in Ancient Judaism, ed. Geoffrey Herman, Saskia Dönitz, and Meron Piotrkowsky (forthcoming, Leiden: Brill).
Himmelfarb, Martha. A Kingdom of Priests: Ancestry and Merit in Ancient Judaism (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006).
Hirshberg, Avraham. “Ha-Issa: Mahutah ve-Toldoteha.” Devir 2 (1923), 92-100.
Jastrow, Marcus. A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli, and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature (London: Luzac, 1903).
Kalmin, Richard. The Sage in Jewish Society of Late Antiquity (London: Routledge, 1999).
Kalmin, Richard. Jewish Babylonia between Persia and Roman Palestine (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).
Katz, Menachem. Jerusalem Talmud Tractate Qiddushin: Critical Edition and a Short Explanation (Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi, 2015).
Kohut, Alexander. Aruch Completum, 3rd ed. (Vienna: Menorah, 1926).
Lavee, Moshe. “‘Proselytes are as Hard to Israel as a Scab is to the Skin’: A Babylonian Talmudic Concept.” Journal for Jewish Studies 63 (2012), 22-48.
Lavee, Moshe. “No Boundaries for the Construction of Boundaries: The Babylonian Talmud’s Emphasis on Demarcation of Identity.” In Rabbinic Traditions between Palestine and Babylonia, ed. Ronit Nikolsky and Tal Ilan (Leiden: Brill, 2014), 84-116.
Levy, Jacob. Chaldäisches Wörterbuch über die Targumim: und einen grossen Theil des Rabbinischen Schriftthums (Leipzig: Baumgärtner, 1881).
Levy, Jacob, Heinrich L. Fleischer, August Wünsche ,and Lazarus Goldschmidt. Wörterbuch über die Talmudim und Midraschim, 2nd ed. (Berlin: Harz, 1924).
Lieberman, Saul. Tosefta ki-Fshuta, 2nd ed. (New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1995).
Mandel, Pinchas. “Lo Hayu Yamim Tovim le-Yisrael ka-Hamisha Assar be-Av u-khe-Yom ha-Kippurim: Al ha-Mishna ha-Aharona shel Massekhet Taʿanit ve-Gilguleha.” Teʿuda 11 (1996), 147-178.
Moreshet, Menachem. A Lexicon of the New Verbs in Tannaitic Hebrew (Ramat-Gan: Bar Ilan University Press, 1980) [Hebrew].
Oppenheimer, Aharon. “Taharat ha-Yihuss be-Bavel ha-Talmudit.” In Eros, Erussin ve-Issurim, ed. Yisrael Bartal and Isaiah Gafni (Jerusalem: Shazar Center, 1998), 71-82.
Oppenheimer, Aharon and Michael Lecker. “The Genealogical Boundaries of Jewish Babylonia.” In Between Rome and Babylon, ed. Aharon Oppenheimer and Nili Oppenheimer (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005), 339-355.
Payne, Richard E. A State of Mixture: Christians, Zoroastrians, and Iranian Political Culture in Late Antiquity (Oakland: University of California Press, 2015).
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay. “Huledet ha-Goy be-Sifrut Hazal.” Teʿudah 26 (2014), 361-438.
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay. “What If We Got Rid of the Goy? Rereading Ancient Jewish Distinctions.” Journal for the Study of Judaism 47 (2016), 149-182.
Rosenthal, F. “Ueber issa: Ein Beitrag zur Sittengeschichte der Juden vor und nach der Verstörung des zweiten Tempels.” Monatschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums 30 (1881), 38-48.
Rubenstein, Jeffrey L. The Culture of the Babylonian Talmud (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).
Satlow, Michael. Jewish Marriage in Antiquity (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).
Schremer, Adiel. Male and Female He Created Them: Jewish Marriage in the Late Second Temple, Mishnah and Talmud Periods (Jerusalem: Shazar Center, 2003) [Hebrew].
Schwartz, Daniel. Studies in the Jewish Background of Christianity (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992).
Shaki, Mansour. “Class System iii. In the Parthian and Sasanian Periods.” Encyclopædia Iranica, vol. 5, 652-658, http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/class-system-iii.
Sivertsev, Alexei. Private Households and Public Politics in 3rd-5th Century Jewish Palestine (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002).
Sivertsev, Alexei. Households, Sects, and the Origins of Rabbinic Judaism (Leiden: Brill, 2005).
Sussmann, Jacob. “ve-Shuv Lirushalmi Neziqin.” Mehkarei Talmud 1 (1990), 55-133.
Vidas, Moulie. Tradition and the Formation of the Talmud (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014).
Walker, Joel T. The Legend of Mar Qardagh: Narrative and Christian Heroism in Late Antique Iraq (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006).
Yankelevitch, Refaʾel. “Mishkalo shel ha-Yihuss ha-Mishpahti ba-Hevra ha-Yehudit be-Eretz Yisrael bi-Tkufat ha-Mishna ve-ha-Talmud.” In Nation and History: Studies in the History of the Jewish People, vol. 1, ed. Menachem Stern (Jerusalem: Shazar Center, 1983), 151-162.
Zuckier, Shlomo. “Hu Ezra Alah mi-Bavel: Ezra as an Exemplar of Babylonian Superiority in Rabbinic Literature.” In Sybils, Scriptures, and Scrolls: John Collins at Seventy, ed. Joel Baden, Hindy Najman, and Eibert Tigchelaar (Leiden: Brill, 2016), 1453-1472.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 318 | 52 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 208 | 4 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 83 | 15 | 1 |
Rabbinic literature is concerned with lineage when determining appropriate marital partners. For the rabbis, not all Jews may marry all other Jews. Some Jews have a lower lineage status and may only marry others of similar status. Scholars have assumed that the Amoraim of Babylonia were more stringent towards matters of lineage than their Palestinian counterparts. However, the talmudic sources themselves do not neatly fit with this dichotomy. Additionally, this generalization does not capture the variety of ways that the Amoraim perceived lineage. In this article, I propose a shift of focus towards the different terminologies and discourses in Amoraic sources, which provide a richer understanding of the ways in which they viewed genealogy, and wished to shape it. These terminologies reflect different ways in which the rabbis constructed the idea of a Jewish people, and its components.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 318 | 52 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 208 | 4 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 83 | 15 | 1 |