Save

On the Vorlage, Tendenz, and Scribal Negligence of AT Esth 1:10–15

In: Journal for the Study of Judaism
Author:
Lydia Lee Fudan University Shanghai China

Search for other papers by Lydia Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8393-990X
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

In this article, a section of the Alpha-Text Esther story (1:10–15) is brought to the foreground to reveal the hitherto unrecognized hints that point to the Hebrew Vorlage, the literary Tendenz, and the scribal negligence unparalleled in either the Septuagint or the Masoretic text. All these literary phenomena suggest that the Alpha-Text and the Masoretic text versions reflect two variant archetypes of a Hebrew text, but this does not mean that both archetypes cannot overlap at places. When the archetypes do overlap, some of the unique readings in the Alpha-Text actually reflect later exegeses or misunderstandings that are dependent on the readings preserved in both the Masoretic text and the Septuagint. The later exegeses in particular help locate the Sitz im Leben of Alpha-Text Esth 1:10–15 in the Hasmonean period and thereafter when the Jewish-gentile relationship is strained.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 399 103 39
Full Text Views 30 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 89 11 0