Market Access Provisions in the Potential EU Model BIT: Towards a “Global BIT 2.0”?

in The Journal of World Investment & Trade
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

One of the defining features of the new generation of European investment treaties is the inclusion of market access provisions. It remains to be seen, however, whether and to what extent this might become a standard practice of the eu. This article attempts to answer this question first by reviewing the development of market access policy in the eu and then by analyzing treaty practice on market access both at the eu level and at Member State level. Subsequently, it discusses the more specific issues that may be involved in market access provisions in the potential eu Model bit. It concludes that the world is witnessing a new generation of investment treaties (“Global bit 2.0”) with the eu and other major economic players accepting concrete market access or investment liberalisation commitments, which shall to a considerable degree help pave the way towards a multilateral investment treaty (mit).

Market Access Provisions in the Potential EU Model BIT: Towards a “Global BIT 2.0”?

in The Journal of World Investment & Trade

Sections

References

10

European Commissionsupra note 4.

12

Shan and Zhangsupra note 1 p. 1050.

16

Leal-Arcas Ibid. p. 884.

20

Shan and Zhangsupra note 1 p. 1051. See also Niklas Maydell ‘The European Community’s Minimum Platform of Investment or the Trojan Horse of Investment Competence’ in A. Reinisch and C. Knahr (eds.) International Investment Law in Context (Eleven International Publishing 2007) 73–92.

24

Shan and Zhangsupra note 1 p. 1065.

28

European Commissionsupra note 4 Article 3.2 of the tfeu provides that “[t]he Union shall also have exclusive competence for the conclusion of an international agreement when its conclusion is provided for in a legislative act of the Union or is necessary to enable the Union to exercise its internal competence or in so far as its conclusion may affect common rules or alter their scope.”

31

European Commissionsupra note 4 p. 5.

40

Gomez-Palacio and Muchlinskisupra note 6 p. 246.

47

Shansupra note 38 pp. 72–73.

56

Zhangsupra note 51 p. 605.

58

Shansupra note 38 p. 71.

59

Shansupra note 11 p. 616.

65

European Commissionsupra note 4.

74

Mathis and Laurenzasupra note 71 p. 168.

95

Gomez-Palacio and Muchlinskisupra note 6 p. 240.

96

Shansupra note 38 p. 75.

98

Chaissesupra note 30 p. 19.

119

European Commissionsupra note 4 p. 7.

122

European Commissionsupra note 26.

Figures

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 20 20 3
Full Text Views 15 15 15
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0