Save

The New Gold Standard? Empirically Situating the Trans-Pacific Partnership in the Investment Treaty Universe

In: The Journal of World Investment & Trade
Authors:
Wolfgang Alschner The Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland and World Trade Institute, Bern, Switzerland, wolfgang.alschner@graduateinstitute.ch

Search for other papers by Wolfgang Alschner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Dmitriy Skougarevskiy European University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation and The Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland, dmitriy.skugarevskiy@graduateinstitute.ch

Search for other papers by Dmitriy Skougarevskiy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) has been labeled a ‘new, high-standard trade agreement’. But just how ‘new’ and ‘high’ are the standards it sets? To answer that question we combine traditional legal analysis with computational text comparisons situating the TPP in the universe of international investment agreements (IIAs). We find that the TPP investment chapter offers few truly novel features — 81% of its text is taken from prior American treaties. Compared to the majority of IIAs, however, the TPP goes beyond existing practice: it sets high levels of investment protection, explicitly safeguards host state sovereignty and establishes a sophisticated investment arbitration architecture. Nevertheless, the TPP is unlikely to revolutionize the IIA universe. Its innovations are open to circumvention given that older treaties remain in force parallel to the TPP. Moreover, as disagreement persists with Europe and BRICS countries, the TPP is unlikely to serve as a template for future multilateralization.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1632 448 71
Full Text Views 335 16 1
PDF Views & Downloads 219 35 3