Save

The Effects of Umbrella Clauses: Their Relevance in Interpretation and in Practice

In: The Journal of World Investment & Trade
Author:
Alperen Afşin Gözlügöl School of Law, University of Hamburg Hamburg Germany

Search for other papers by Alperen Afşin Gözlügöl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Umbrella clauses have sparked one of the great debates in international investment law as regards their proper construction. This article argues that a particular line of reasoning and interpretation appears to be unduly focusing on the effects of such clauses in the process of construing them. In other words, what seems to occur in the interpretation of umbrella clauses is that some tribunals, frightened by the far-reaching consequences, construe such clauses more narrowly. I call this phenomenon ‘adverse effects analysis’ and demonstrate that it is inconsistent with the proper construction of umbrella clauses in accordance with the rules of interpretation in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT). In this course, the effects of umbrella clauses in practice are also put forward along with an analysis of them under ‘manifest absurdity or unreasonableness test’ pursuant to Article 32(b) of VCLT.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1411 119 4
Full Text Views 230 35 3
PDF Views & Downloads 494 92 3