The Changing Nature of Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries

Evidence and Implications

in The Journal of World Investment & Trade
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

The Changing Nature of Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries

Evidence and Implications

in The Journal of World Investment & Trade

References

  • A good discussion of the concepts ofhorizontal and vertical Fm is given by Markusen and Maskus (2001). 2 I'lant-level fixed costs are the additional tixed costs involved in setting up a new plant. They also include the costs of dealing with foreign administration, regulations and tax systems.

  • 3 Between 1990 and 2001, inward Frn stocks in telecommunications and power generation and distribution increased 9 times and 13 times, respectively, in developing countries (UNCTAD, 2003).

  • I For an in-depth discussion of these issues, see Mani and Wheeler (1997); OECD (1998); and Neurnayer (2001). ). Strong crowding-out has been the norm in Latin America (Agosin and Mayer, 2000). In the case of "natural monopolies", a State monopoly would be replaced by a private monopoly (Nunnenkamp, 2002).

  • In 1996, developing countries' share of world investment inflows rose to an all-time high of 37 percent (UNCTAD, 1997b).

  • H Nunnenkamp and Spatz (2002b) would appear to be the first researchers who have assessed changes in the relative importance of traditional Fm determinants over time. 9 For a discussion oftraditional determinants, refer to Section 11.13 of this article.

  • 1(1 Emerging market countries are in this context defined as including Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, China Mainland, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, the Czech Republic, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Jordan, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Panama, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, the Russian Federation, the Slovak Republic, South Africa, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, Uruguay, Venezuela and Viet Nam.

  • For a discussion of non-traditional determinants., refer to Section II.B of this article.

  • 12 Notably (osta Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala.

  • 13 According to the Oecd Development Assistance Cornrnittee (DAC), total official development assistance (ODA) from DAC Member countries (the "donor" community) to developing countries and multilateral organizations has declined from 0.33 percent of DAC Members' combined gross national income (GNI) in 1990-1992 to 0.30, 0.29, 0.26 and 0.25 percent of their combined GNI in subsequent years before reaching the low point of 0.22 percent in the period 1999-2001. However, it should be noted that Oun has slightly recovered to 0.23 and 0.25 percent in 2002 and 2003, respectively (figures for 2003 are still preliminary); see the OECD Development Assistance Committee Database.

  • �; In fact, the lack ofskillcd labour is one of the principal reasons why Li)(:s so far have been unable to attract efficiency-seeking FDI (Zhang and Markusen, 1999).

  • J.P. Agarwal, 1980: Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Survey, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 116, pp. 739―773.

  • M.R. Agosin and R. Mayer, 2000: Foreign Investment in Developing CountriesDoes it Crowd in Domestic Investment? UNCTAD, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • O. Akinkugbe, 2003: Flow of Foreign Direct Investment to Hitherto Neglected Developing Countries, World Institute for Developing Economic Research/United Nations University, Tokyo.

  • M. Blonström, A. Kokko and M. Zejan, 2000: Foreign Direct Investment: Firm and Host Country Strategies, Macmillan, London.

  • C. Buch, J. Kleinert and F. Toubal, 2003: Determinants of German FDI: New Evidence from Micro-Data, Deutsche Bundesbank, Discussion Paper 09/03, Frankfurt.

  • A. Chakrabarti, 2001: The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Regressions, Kyklos 54, pp. 89―113.

  • J.-W. Cho, 2003: Foreign Direct Investment: Determinants, Trends in Flows and Promotion Policies, Investment Promotion and Enterprise Development Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, Chapter 5, ESCAP, Bangkok; available at: ‹www.unescaporg/tid/publication/chap5_indpub2259.pdf›.

  • C. Chunlai, 1997: The Location Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries, Chinese Economies Research Centre, Adelaide, Australia.

  • S.W. Clark, 2000: Tax Incentives for Foreign Direct Investment: Empirical Evidence on Effects and Alternative Policy Options, Canadian Tax Journal 28, pp. 1139―1180.

  • CMCG (Capital Markets Consultative Group), 2003: Foreign Direct Investment in Emerging Market Countries, Report of the Working Group of the Capital Markets Consultative Group, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

  • R. Dornbusch, 1992: The Case of Trade Liberalisation in Developing Countries, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Winter 1992, pp. 69―85.

  • J.H. Dunning, 1993: Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Addison Wesley, Wokingham, U.K.

  • Idem, 1994: MNE Activity: Comparing the NAFTA and the European Community, in Eden, op.cit.

  • Idem, (ed.), 1997: Governments, Globalisation and International Business, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.

  • Idem, 1999: Globalisation and the Theory of MNE Activity, University of Reading, Discussion Paper in International Investment and Management 264, Reading, U.K.

  • Idem, 2002: Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Globalisation-Induced Changes and the Role of FDI Policies, paper presented at the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics in Europe, Oslo, Norway, mimeo.

  • A. Easson, 2001: Tax Incentives for Foreign Direct Investment Part 1: Recent Trends and Countertrends, Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation 55, pp. 266―274.

  • ECLAC: (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean), 1998: Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America & the Caribbean. 1998 Report. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Characteristics of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Latin America, ECLAC, Santiago de Chile.

  • L. Eden (ed), 1994: Multinationals in North America, University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

  • V. Gastanaga, J. Nugent and B. Pashamova, 1998: Host Country Reforms and FDI Inflows: How Much Difference Do They Make? World Development 26, pp. 1299―1314.

  • H.P. Gray, 2001: The Concept of "Globalization", Global Economic Quarterly 2, pp. 99―116.

  • G. Hanson, R. Malaloni and M. Slaughter, 2001: Expansion Strategies of U.S. Multinational Firms, NBER Working Paper No. 8433, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) and IRELA (Institute for European Latin American Relations), 1996: Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America in the 1990s, IDB and IRELA, Madrid.

  • Idem, 1998: Foreign Direct Investment: Perspectives of the Major Investors, IDB and IRELA, Madrid.

  • S. Jackson and S. Markowski, 1995: The Attractiveness of Countries to Foreign Direct Investment: Implications for the Asia-Pacific Region, Journal of World Trade, Issue 29, pp. 159―179.

  • Y. Kinoshita, 1998: Firm Size and Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment, Economics Working Paper Archive, Washington University, St. Louis.

  • A. Kokko, 2002: Globalisation and FDI Incentives, paper presented at the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics in Europe, Oslo, Norway, mimeo.

  • P. Krugman, 1995: Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1.

  • N. Kumar, 2002: Globalisation and the Quality of Foreign Direct Investment, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.

  • S. Lall, 1997: East Asia, in Dunning (ed.), 1997, op. cit., pp. 414―423.

  • Idem, 2000: FDI and Development: Policy and Research Issues in the Emerging Context, QEH Working Paper Number 43, Queen Elisabeth House, Oxford, U.K.

  • P. Mallampally and K.P. Sauvant, 1999: Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries, Finance & Development, Vol. 36, No. 1, March, pp. 34-37.

  • M. Mani and D. Wheeler, 1997: In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industries in the World Economy, 1960-95, mimeo, Policy Research Department, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  • J. Markusen and K. Maskus, 2001: General Equilibrium Approaches to the Multinational Firm: A Review of Theory and Evidence, NBER Working Paper 8334, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • J. Markusen and A. Venables, 2000: The Theory of Endowment, Intra-Industry, and Multinational Trade, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 209―234.

  • M. Mortimore, 2000: Foreign Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean. 1999 Report, ECLAC, Unit on Investment and Corporate Strategies, Santiago de Chile.

  • F. Noorbaksh, A. Paloni and A. Youssef, 2001: Human Capital and FDI Inflows to Developing Countries: New Empirical Evidence, World Development 29, pp. 1593―1610.

  • E. Neumayer, 2001: Pollution Havens: An Analysis of Policy Options for Dealing with an Elusive Phenomenon, Journal of Environment & Development, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 147―177.

  • P. Nunnenkamp, 1997a: Herausforderungen der Globalizierung für Brasilien, Die Weltwirtschaft 1/1997, pp. 106―130.

  • Idem, 1997b: Direct Investment in Latin America in the Era of Globalised Production, Transnational Corporations, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 51-81.

  • Idem, 2001: European FDI Strategies in Mercosur Countries, Kiel Working Paper No. 1047, Institute for World Economics, Kiel, Germany.

  • Idem, 2002: Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries: What Economists (Don't) Know and What Policy Makers Should (Not) Do, CUTS Centre for International Trade, Economics & Environment, Jaipur, India.

  • P. Nunnenkamp and T. Jost, 2002: Bestimmungsgründe deutscher Direktinvestitionen in Entwicklungs- und ReformländernHat sich wirklich etwas verändert? Kieler Arbeitspapier Nr. 1124, Institut für Wcltwirtschaft, Kiel, Germany.

  • P. Nunnenkamp and J. Spatz, 2002a: Globalizierung der AutomobilindustrieWettbewerbsdruck , Arbeitsmarkeffekt und Anpassungsreaktionen, Kieler Studien 317, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, Germany.

  • Idem, 2002b: Determinants of FDI in Developing Countries: Has Globalisation Changed the Rules of the Game? Transnational Corporations 11, Issue 2.

  • Idem, 2003a: Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: How Relevant Are Host-Country and Industry Characteristics? Kiel Working Paper No. 1176, Institute for World Economics, Kiel, Germany.

  • Idem, 2003b: Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment: The Role of Industry and Host-Country Characteristics, Kcil Working Paper 1167, Institute for World Economics, Kiel, Germany.

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 1995: Special Features: Current Trends in Foreign Direct Investment, OECD, Paris.

  • Idem, 1998: Open Markets MatterThe Benefits of Trade and Investment Liberalisation, OECD, Paris.

  • Idem, 2002a: Attracting International Investment for Development, OECD Global Forum on International Investment, Paris.

  • Idem, 2002b: Foreign Direct Investment for DevelopmentMaximising Benefits, Minimising Costs: Main Report, OECD, Paris.

  • M. Porter, 1986: Competition in Global Industries: A Conceptual Framework, in M. Porter (ed.), Competition in Global Industries, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

  • L.D. Qiu, 2003: Comparing Sectoral FDI Incentives: Comparative Advantages and Market Opportunities, Annals of Economics and Finance, Bd. 4, pp. 151―176.

  • F. Sader, 1993: Privatization and Foreign Investment in the Developing World, 1988-92, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1202, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  • H. Schnitz, 1984: Industrialization Strategies in Less Developed Countries: Some Lessons of Historical Experiences, Journal of Development Studies 21, pp. 1-21.

  • D. Sethi, S.E. Guisinger, S.E. Phelan and D.M. Berg, 2003: Trends in Foreign Direct Investment Flows: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, Journal of International Business 34, pp. 315-326.

  • A.F.M. Shamsuddin, 1994: Economic Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Less Developed Countries, Pakistan Development Review 33, pp. 41-51.

  • H.J. Shatz, 1999: U.S. Multinational Exports from Developing Countries, Harvard University and World Bank, mimeo.

  • H.J. Shatz and A. Venables, 2000: The Geography of International Investment, Policy Research Working Paper 2338, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  • H. Singh and K.W. Jun, 1995: Some New Evidence on Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment, in Developing Countries, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1531, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  • H. Sinha, S. Dasgupta and A. Mody, 1996: Japanese Multinationals in Asia: Capabilities and Motivations, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  • C.T. Taylor, 2000: The Impact of Host Country Government Policy on U.S. Multinational Investment Decisions, World Economy 23, pp. 635-647.

  • S. Thomsen, 2000: Investment Patterns in a Longer-Term Perspective, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.

  • P.-L. Tsai, 1994: Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment and its Impact on Economic Growth, Journal of Economic Development 19, pp. 137-163.

  • UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), 1995: Recent Developments in International Investment and Transnational Corporations. Trends in Foreign Direct Investment, UN Doc. TD/B/ITNC/2, United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Idem, 1996: World Investment Report 1996, United Nations, New York.

  • Idem, 1997a: Survey of Best Practices in Investment Promotion, United Nations, New York.

  • Idem, 1997b: World Investment Report 1997Transnational Corporations, Market Structure and Competition Policy, United Nations, New York.

  • Idem, 1998: World Investment Report 1998: Trends and Determinants, United Nations, New York.

  • Idem, 1999: Trends in FDI and the Ways and Means of Enhancing FDI Flows to and among Developing Countries, United Nations, New York.

  • Idem, 2000a: World Investment Report 2000, United Nations, New York.

  • Idem, 2000b: FDI Determinants and TNC Strategies: The Case of Brazil, United Nations, NewYork.

  • Idem, 2003: FDI and DevelopmentThe Case of Privatisation-related ServicesTrends, Impacts and Policy Issues, United Nations, New York.

  • A. Walter, 2002: The Political Economy of FDI Location: Why Don't Political Checks and Balances and Treaty Constraints Matter? Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies, Singapore.

  • D. Wheeler and A. Mody, 1992: International Investment Location Decisions: The Case for U.S. Firms, Journal of International Economics 33, pp. 57―76.

  • E.L. Yeyati, E. Stein and C. Daude, 2002: FTAA and the Location of FDI, paper presented at the IDB Harvard Conference on the FTAA, Punta del Este, Uruguay.

  • K.H. Zhang, 2000: Human Capital, Country Size and North-South Manufacturing Multinational Enterprises, Economia Intcrnazionale 53, pp. 237―260.

  • Idem, 2002: Why Does China Receive so much Foreign Direct Investment? China & The World, No. 3.

  • K.H. Zhang and J.R. Markusen, 1999: Vertical Multinationals and Host-Country Characteristics, Journal of Development Economics 59, pp. 233―252.

  • Z. Zimny, 2003: Privatisation-related Services FDI, paper presented at the Expert Meeting on FDI and Development, UNCTAD, Geneva, Switzerland.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 44 44 4
Full Text Views 77 77 0
PDF Downloads 2 2 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0