The first Slovenian novel is yet to be read in a way that is both comparative and sociological. For while Slovenian studies treats the emergence of the Slovenian novel sociologically but not comparatively, comparative literature studies views it comparatively yet not sociologically. This gap can be filled by the perspective of the literary world-system. Moreover, this viewpoint can subtilize the thesis of Slovenian studies that the belatedness of the Slovenian novel is part of the belatedness of the Slovenian bourgeoisie as well as the comparatist thesis that the Slovenian novel became possible only after the end of the possibility of the traditional European novel. The world-systemic approach can grasp this belatedness as a social fact that speaks less of the Slovenian novel’s essence than of the structural relations between Slovenian culture and its European social environment.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Hélène Iswolsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. “Discourse in the Novel.” In Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981, 259–422.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
Freud, Sigmund. “An Outline of Psycho-analysis.” In Freud, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Volume 23. Ed. and trans. James Strachey et al. London: Vintage, 2001, 139–207.
Freud, Sigmund. “Fetishism.” In Freud, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Volume 21. Ed. and trans. James Strachey et al. London: Vintage, 2001, 147–157.
Hegel, G.W.F. Philosophy of Mind. Trans. William Wallace and A.V. Miller, rev. Michael Inwood. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2007.
Javornik, Miha. “Mednyj vsadnik A.S. Pushkina i Kreshchenie pri Savice F. Presherna kak paradigma dvuh kul’tur.” In F. Prešeren – A.S. Puškin / F. Preshern – A.S. Pushkin, ed. Miha Javornik. Ljubljana: ZIFF, 2001, 187–201.
Jurčič, Josip. “Deseti brat.” In Jurčič, Zbrano delo. Tretja knjiga, ed. Mirko Rupel. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije, 1965, 139–371.
Juvan, Marko. “Svetovni literarni sistem.” Primerjalna književnost 32:2 (2009), 181–212.
Juvan, Marko. Literary Studies in Reconstruction: An Introduction to Literature. Trans. Simona Lapanja et al. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2011.
Kmecl, Matjaž. Od pridige do kriminalke. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga, 1975.
Kmecl, Matjaž. Rojstvo slovenskega romana. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga, 1981.
Kmecl, Matjaž. Josip Jurčič: pripovednik in dramatik. Ljubljana: Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo, 2009.
Kos, Janko. “Evropski izviri slovenskega romana v 19. stoletju.” Slavistična revija 33:1 (1985), 27–50.
Kos, Janko. “Puškinov roman v verzih in Prešernova povest v verzih kot genološki problem.” In Romantična pesnitev: ob 200. obletnici rojstva Franceta Prešerna, ed. Marko Juvan. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta, 2002, 3–12.
Lotman, Jurij. “Roman v stikhah Pushkina ‘Evgenij Onegin’. Speckurs.” In Lotman, Pushkin, eds. A.Y. Balakin, O.N. Nechipurenko, and N.G. Nikolayuk. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo, 1999, 393–462.
Mannoni, Octave. “I Know Well, but All the Same …” Trans. G.M. Goshgarian. In Perversion and the Social Relation, eds. Molly Anne Rothenberg, Dennis A. Foster, and Slavoj Žižek. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2003, 68–92.
Močnik, Rastko. Julija Primic v slovenski književni vedi. Ljubljana: Sophia, 2006.
Moretti, Franco. “Conjectures on World Literature.” New Left Review 1 (2000), 54–68.
Moretti, Franco. “More Conjectures.” New Left Review 20 (2003), 73–81.
Moretti, Franco. The Bourgeois: Between History and Literature. London: Verso, 2013.
Paternu, Boris. “Uvodna beseda.” In Josip Jurčič, Deseti brat. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije, 1998, 13–36.
Petkovska, Nada. “The Chronotopes of the Castle, Drawing-room and Provincial Town in the Slovenian Novel of the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century.” In Bahtin in humanistične vede, eds. Miha Javornik et al. Ljubljana: ZIFF, 1997, 273–278.
Pirjevec, Dušan. “Pri izvirih slovenskega romana.” Problemi 10:109 (1972), 31–36.
Pirjevec, Dušan. “Problem slovenskega romana.” Trans. Tomo Virk. Literatura 9: 67/68 (1997), 63–75.
Rob, Ivan. Deseti brat. S.l.: s.n., 1938.
Rupel, Mirko. “Opombe.” In Josip Jurčič, Zbrano delo. Tretja knjiga. Ur. Mirko Rupel. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije, 1965, 373–414.
Skaza, Aleksander. “Evgenij Onegin A.S. Pushkina i Venok sonetov France Presherna.” In F. Prešeren – A.S. Puškin / F. Preshern – A.S. Pushkin, ed. Miha Javornik. Ljubljana: ZIFF, 2001, 177–186.
Verč, Ivan. Razumevanje jezikov književnosti. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, 2010.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 432 | 143 | 27 |
Full Text Views | 76 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 71 | 5 | 0 |
The first Slovenian novel is yet to be read in a way that is both comparative and sociological. For while Slovenian studies treats the emergence of the Slovenian novel sociologically but not comparatively, comparative literature studies views it comparatively yet not sociologically. This gap can be filled by the perspective of the literary world-system. Moreover, this viewpoint can subtilize the thesis of Slovenian studies that the belatedness of the Slovenian novel is part of the belatedness of the Slovenian bourgeoisie as well as the comparatist thesis that the Slovenian novel became possible only after the end of the possibility of the traditional European novel. The world-systemic approach can grasp this belatedness as a social fact that speaks less of the Slovenian novel’s essence than of the structural relations between Slovenian culture and its European social environment.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 432 | 143 | 27 |
Full Text Views | 76 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 71 | 5 | 0 |