This article discusses the work of the early Irish comparatists Hutcheson Macaulay Posnett, who in 1886 published the first monograph in English in comparative literature. By bringing into discussion Posnett’s lesser-known journalistic publications on politics, the essay argues that his comparative project was importantly determined by the contemporary challenges of British imperial politics and by his own position in the British Empire. The article investigates several aspects of Posnett’s work in the context of British colonialism: his understanding of literature and literary criticism, his perception of the English and French systems of national literature, and his understanding of world literature and classical literature. Recognising the imperial and colonial context of Comparative Literature additionally highlights the development of literary comparisons, which have marked subsequent discussions in the discipline.
Bhattacharya Baidik. “On Comparatism in the Colony: Archives Methods and the Project of Weltliteratur.” Critical Inquiry 42:3 (2016) 677–711. doi: 10.1086/685608
Bock Kenneth E. “Comparison of Histories: The Contribution of Henry Maine.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 16:2 (1974) 232–62. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500007477
Damrosch David. “Rebirth of a Discipline: The Global Origins of Comparative Studies.” Comparative Critical Studies 3:1 (2006) 99–112. doi: 10.1353/ccs.2006.0006
Damrosch David. “Toward a History of World Literature.” New Literary History 39:3–4 (2009) 481–95. doi: 10.1353/nlh.0.0045
Damrosch David. What is World Literature? Princeton: Princeton UP 2003.
Dewey Clive. “The Influence of Sir Henry Maine on Agrarian Policy in India.” In The Victorian Achievement of Sir Henry Maine: A Centennial Reappraisal. Ed. Alan Diamond. Cambridge: Cambridge UP 1991 353–75.
During Simon. “Comparative Literature.” ELH 71:2 (2004) 313–22. doi: 10.2307/30030050
Hamza Gábor. “Sir Henry Maine et le droit comparé.” Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 45:2–3 (2005) 193–206. doi: 10.1556/AAnt.45.2005.2–3.8
Hutton Christopher. “Race and Language: Ties of ‘Blood and Speech’ Fictive Identity and Empire in the Writings of Henry Maine and Edward Freeman.” Interventions 2:1 (2000) 53–72. doi: 10.1080/136980100360797
Jolly Roslyn. “Robert Louis Stevenson Henry Maine and the Anthropology of Comparative Law.” Journal of British Studies 45:3 (2006) 556–80. doi: 10.1086/503591
Leerssen Joep. “Comparing What Precisely? H.M. Posnett and the Conceptual History of ‘Comparative Literature.’ ” Comparative Critical Studies 12:2 (2015) 197–212. doi: 10.3366/ccs.2015.0167
Leerssen Joep. Komparatistik in Grossbritannien 1800–1950. Bonn: Bouvier 1984.
Leerssen Joep. “Some Notes on Hutcheson Macauley Posnett (1855–1927).” In Back to the Future of Irish Studies. Ed. Maureen O’Connor. Bern: Peter Lang 2010 111–19. doi: 10.3726/978-3-0353-0069-7
Lightman Bernard. “The International Scientific Series and the Communication of Darwinism?” Journal of Cambridge Studies 5:4 (2010) 27–38. doi: 10.17863/CAM.1367.
Maine Henry Sumner. Village-Communities in the East and West. Six Lectures Delivered at Oxford. London: John Murray 1871.
Mantena Karuna. Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism. Princeton: Princeton UP 2010.
McInturff Kate. “The Uses and Abuses of World Literature.” The Journal of American Culture 26:2 (2003) 224–36. doi: 10.1111/1542–734X.00088
Naiditch P.G. A.E. Housman at University College London: The Election of 1892. Leiden: Brill 1988.
Orenstein Henry. “The Ethnological Theories of Henry Sumner Maine.” American Anthropologist 70:2 (1968) 264–76. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.2.02a00030
Pizer Donald. “Evolutionary Ideas in Late Nineteenth-Century English and American Literary Criticism.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 19:3 (1961) 305–10. doi: 10.2307/428073
Pizer John. “Goethe’s ‘World Literature’ Paradigm and Contemporary Cultural Globalization.” Comparative Literature 52:3 (2000) 213–27. doi: 10.2307/1771407
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “Action of Moderate Liberals.” The Times 14 Oct. 1913.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “Clan Poetry.” The Academy 23 Feb. 1884.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. Comparative Literature. London: Kegan Paul Trench 1886.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “Federation in Fiscal Anarchy.” The Contemporary Review 89 (1906) 387–405.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. Hereditary Lords: A Reply to the Peers. London: Longmans Green 1894.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “Irish National Imperialism.” The Contemporary Review 89 (1906) 645–60.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “No More Higgling.” The Times 29 Jul. 1914 10.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “Pa-Pa-Ki or San-Pou-Tsong”. The Nineteenth century 49 (1901) 307–20.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “The Federal Constitution of Australia.” Fortnightly Review 69 (1901) 969–88.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. The Historical Method in Ethics Jurisprudence and Political Economy. London: Longmans Green 1882.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “The Irish Franchises.” The Times 30 Jan. 1883 12.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “The Irish Grand Jury and The Irish County Board.” The Times 16 Feb. 1883 3.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “The Science of Comparative Literature.” Comparative Literature: The Early Years. Eds. Hans-Joachim Schulz and Phillip H. Rhein. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press 1973 183–206.
Posnett Hutcheson Macaulay. “What Are We Voting For?” The Times 6 Jan. 1910 5.
Simpson James. Matthew Arnold and Goethe. London: Modern Humanities Research Association 1979.
Sinclair Keith. A History of the University of Auckland 1883–1983. Auckland: Auckland UP 1983.
Strich Fritz. Goethe und die Weltliteratur. Bern: Francke Verlag 1946.
Underwood Ted. Why Literary Periods Mattered: Historical Contrast and the Prestige of English Studies. Stanford: Stanford UP 2013.
Van Tieghem Paul. La Littérature Comparée. Paris: A. Colin 1931.
Young Robert. Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory Culture and Race. London and New York: Routledge 1995.