Worldview Formation and the Disney Universe

A Case Study on Media Engagement in Youth Ministry

in Journal of Youth and Theology
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


This interdisciplinary article argues that media messages play an important role in worldview formation across cultural contexts. Therefore, youth ministry needs to integrate media engagement in its reflection and practice. The article outlines a methodological approach for content analysis of media messages, with worldview theory as the key hermeneutical perspective. Classic Disney films are used as case study, as an influential tradition with its themes and values carried on into ever new formats. Finally, the article reflects missiologically on points of contact and points of tension in relation to the case study, and proposes “double listening” as a key practice in youth ministry, with hermeneutics, didactics, and formation as a threefold approach.

Worldview Formation and the Disney Universe

A Case Study on Media Engagement in Youth Ministry

in Journal of Youth and Theology



  • BartolomewC. & MoritzT.. 2000. Christ and Consumerism: A Critical Analysis of the Spirit of the Age. Exeter: Paternoster Press.

  • DahleL. 2014. “Media Messages Matter: Towards a New Missiological Approach to Media Engagement”Norwegian Journal of Missiology68 (2): 105121.

  • DahleL. & DahleM.S.. 2014. “Resourcing the Global Church. A Guide to Key Lausanne Resources 1974–2013”. In DahleL.DahleM.S. & JørgensenK. (eds.): The Lausanne Movement: A Range of Perspectives. 113131. Oxford: Regnum Books International.

  • DahleM.S. 2012. «Forskningsprosjektet ‘10–25’ i religionspedagogisk perspektiv» in Theofilos 4 (2): 2848.

  • DahleM.S. 2006. “Worldview Analysis of Popular Media: A Christian Perspective”. In GrandhagenE. Myksvollog Å. (eds.). Budskap Årsskrift for fmh7. Årgang. 165175. Oslo: Fjellhaug

  • FadnerD.E. 1998. “Disney Gets Religion” Paper presented at The American Academy of ReligionOrlando. November. Available online at 15th January 2016.

  • FruzinskaJ. 2014. Emerson Goes to the Movies. Individualism in Wald Disney Company’s Post-1989 Animated Films. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  • GirouxH.A & PollockG.. 2010. The Mouse that Roared. Disney and the end of Innocence . Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

  • HartA.D. & Hart FrejdS.. 2013. The Digital Invasion. How Technology Is Shaping You and Your Relationships. Grand Rapids: Baker Books.

  • HjarvardS. 2013. The Mediatization of Culture and Society. London: Routledge.

  • HoechsmannM. & PoyntzS.R.. 2012. Media Literacies: A Critical Introduction . Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.

  • HowellD. 1997. “Youth Culture and World View”Whitfield Briefing 2 (6): 14. Oxford: The Whitefield Institute. Available online at accessed 1st February 2017.

  • KinnamanD. 2016. “What’s Next for Youth Ministry?”. 8390. In The State of Youth Ministry. The Barna Group.

  • LynchG. 2005. Understanding Theology and Popular Culture. Malden. Mass: Blackwell.

  • LövheimM. 2012. “Religious Socialization in a Media Age” in Nordic Journal of Religion and Society . 25 (2): 151168.

  • McGrathA.E. 2014. “Double Listening. John Stott on Cultural Translation and Apologetics” The John Stott London Lecture 2014.

  • NaugleD.K. 2002. Worldview: The History of a Concept. Cambridge: Eerdman.

  • PinskyM.I. 2004. The Gospel According to Disney. Faith Trust and Pixie Dust . Louisville, Westminister: John Knox Press.

  • PorterD. 1988. User’s Guide to the Media . Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press.

  • SavageS.Colins-MayoS.MayoB. & CrayG.. 2011. Making Sense of Generation Y: The World-views of 16- to 25-year-olds . London: Church House Publishing.

  • SireJ.W. 2009. The Universe Next Door: A Basic Worldview Catalog . Downer’s Grove ill: InterVarsity Press5th ed.

  • SireJ.W. 2015. Naming the Elephant: Worldview as a Concept . Downer’s Grove ill: InterVarsity Press2nd ed.

  • SmithC. & DentonM.. 2005. Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • StottJ. 1992. The Contemporary Christian: An Urgent Plea for Double Listening. Leicester: InterVarsity Press.

  • TurpinK. 2006. Branded: Adolescents Converting from Consumer Faith. Cleveland oh: Pilgrim Press.

  • WardA.R. 2002. Mouse Morality: The Rhetoric of Disney Animated Film . Austin tx: The University of Texas Press.

  • WaskoJ. 2013 (2001). Understanding Disney . 7th reprint. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • 1

    Lövheim 2012: 151.

  • 4

    Sire 2015: 141. Naugle proposed that a proper understanding of worldview must include the intellectual ideas (the content) the spiritual-moral dimensions (the heart) and the semiotic signs (the carriers of meaning).

  • 5

    Gordon Lynch (2005) helpfully distinguishes between author-focused text-based and audience-focused approaches in theological engagements with popular culture. The third approach of his would add significant perspectives to the present study but is out of the scope of this article.

  • 12

     See esp. Ward 2002Pinsky 2004 Giroux / Pollock 2010 Wasko 2013 and Fruzinska 2014. It is worth noting that Ward uses the following definition in her analysis of Disney: “A worldview is the mean by which experience and belief are merged and organized and by which values are prioritized.” (p. x).

  • 24

    According to Fruzinska 2014the post 1989 animated Disney films express an “Emersonian individualism” with self-reliance as a key element.

  • 26

     Quoted in Pinsky 2004: 7–8. Pinsky follows on by stating that The Disney Gospel “is all about me. My dreams. My will. ‘When you wish upon a star your dreams come true.’ The Disney Bible has both one verse and that is it.” (2004: 10).

  • 27

     Quoted in Pinsky 2004: 9.

  • 29

     See L. Dahle 2014.

  • 31

     See Stott 1992 and McGrath 2014.

  • 33

     Cf. Smith & Denton 2005.

  • 34

     Cf. Savage et al. 2011.


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 69 69 18
Full Text Views 191 191 26
PDF Downloads 9 9 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0