Takeshima/Dokdo Problem in the San Francisco System

Reconsidering Its Origin and Settlement in a Multilateral Framework

in The Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Various issues were left unresolved in the San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan. The Takeshima/Dokdo problem is no exception. A close examination of the post-war territorial disposition of Japan suggests that these issues were left unresolved under the strong influence of the Cold War. The treaty was prepared and signed in a multilateral framework, in which several issues were linked together. However, their historical and political linkages have been neglected or overlaid by other features over the years. Remembering its Cold War origin and multilateral linkages, settlement of the Takeshima/Dokdo problem may be considered together with other outstanding issues in a broader multilateral framework. There are important lessons to learn from the European experiences, including the 1975 Helsinki Declaration (Accords). A workable settlement formula would include mutual concessions and collective gains among the concerned parties in East Asia.

Takeshima/Dokdo Problem in the San Francisco System

Reconsidering Its Origin and Settlement in a Multilateral Framework

in The Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law

Sections

References

1

Kyu Yeon Ju‘Takeshima (Dokdo) wa dare no shima desuka’ in 27th Annual Ontario Speech Contest available athttp://buna.arts.yorku.ca/ojsc/ojsc27_2009/ojsc27_2009_winners_speeches.pdf (Toronto Mar. 14 2009). The speech title translated in the program was “Whose Island Is It Anyway?”. However a more precise translation should be “Whose Island is Takeshima (Dokdo)?” The author of this article served as the Chief Judge at the contest.

25

Rusk note of August 10 1951available athttp://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Rusk_note_of_1951 (last visited Mar. 2 2016).

37

Heonik Kwon‘Pallax Visions in the Dokdo-Takeshima Dispute’ in Conference on the Inter-disciplinary Approaches to the Dokdo’s Sovereignty and Border Questions60 (Conference Proceedings) (Gyeongsan South Korea May 13–14 2009).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 19 19 11
Full Text Views 17 17 17
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0