Takeshima/Dokdo Problem in the San Francisco System

Reconsidering Its Origin and Settlement in a Multilateral Framework

In: The Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law
Kimie Hara University of Waterloo Canada

Search for other papers by Kimie Hara in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


Various issues were left unresolved in the San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan. The Takeshima/Dokdo problem is no exception. A close examination of the post-war territorial disposition of Japan suggests that these issues were left unresolved under the strong influence of the Cold War. The treaty was prepared and signed in a multilateral framework, in which several issues were linked together. However, their historical and political linkages have been neglected or overlaid by other features over the years. Remembering its Cold War origin and multilateral linkages, settlement of the Takeshima/Dokdo problem may be considered together with other outstanding issues in a broader multilateral framework. There are important lessons to learn from the European experiences, including the 1975 Helsinki Declaration (Accords). A workable settlement formula would include mutual concessions and collective gains among the concerned parties in East Asia.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 660 109 10
Full Text Views 280 11 2
PDF Views & Downloads 134 23 5