A Bayesian and Emergent View of the Brain

in KronoScope
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Very simple psychophysiological visual tests suggest that the brain, instead of processing visual information in a passive way as was classically thought, in fact actively evaluates probabilities of the causes of visual data and continuously proposes to the mind the ones that are more likely to account for sensory inputs. In the past few years, Karl Friston, a researcher from University College of London, and his group have proposed a mechanism by which the brain successfully performs with great precision the inversion of probability densities necessary for this Bayesian computation. This mechanism would account for several anatomic structures of the cortex, explaining in particular the abundance of backwards interneuronal connections. The proposed picture of brain functioning is that of a dynamical process, far from the static image of a photographic plate. The result is an emergence, for the final picture of the world is a coherent vision where the more likely causes are proposed in a coherent manner. Although the theory accounts for the automatic, infraconscious side of the processing of information in the brain, it is in good accord with Roger Sperry’s theory of consciousness as a theory of strong emergence. It is too soon to evaluate the solidity of the law of “minimization of free energy” proposed by Friston not only as ruling the automatisms of the brain but as a general law of biology. This law is similar (although in contradistinction) to the second law of thermodynamics of increase of entropy (insofar as it explains the tendency of living beings for self-organization), and it is already looked at by some neuroscientists as a big step forward in deciphering the mysteries of the brain.

A Bayesian and Emergent View of the Brain

in KronoScope



BergsonH. PogsonF.L. Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness 1910 M.A. London George Allen and Unwin

BergsonH. Creative Evolution 1911 New York Henry Holt and Company

CahooneL. The Orders of Nature 2013 Albany New York State University Press

DehaenneS. Cours du Collège de France 2012 http://www.college-de-france.fr/site/stanislas-dehaene/course-2012-02-21-09h30.htm

ErnstM.O.BülthoffH.H. “Merging the Senses into a Robust Percept.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004 8 4 162 169

FristonK. “Functional Integration and Inference in the Brain.” Progress in Neurobiology 2002 68 113 143

FristonK. “Learning and Inference in the brain.” Neural Networks 2003 16 1325 1352

FristonK. “A Theory of Cortical Responses.” Philopshical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2005 360 815 836

FristonK. “A free energy principle for the brain.” Journal of Physiology-Paris 2006 100 70 87

FristonK. “The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2010 11 127 138

FristonK. “Life as We Know It” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2013 10 20130475

GeorgopoulosA.CaminitiR.KalaskaR.MasseyJ. MassionJ.PaillardJ.ShultzW.WiesendangerM. “Spatial Coding of Movement: a Hypothesis Concerning the Coding of Movement Direction by Motor Control Populations.” Neural Coding of Motor Performance 1983 Berlin Springer 327 336 Experimental Brain Research Supplementum 7

KimJ. MarkA.HumphreysBedauHumphreysPaul “The Nonreductivist’s Troubles with Mental Causation.” Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science 2008 Cambridge, MA MIT Press 427 445

LestienneR. Dialogues sur l’Emergence 2012 Paris Le Pommier

LestienneR. “Emergence and the Mind-Body Problem in Roger Sperry’s Studies.” Kronoscope: Journal for the Study of Time 2013 13 112 126

SperryR.W. “Mind-Brain Interaction: Mentalism, Yes; Dualism, No.” Neuroscience 1980 5 195 206

SperryR.W. “Some Effects of Disconnecting the Cerebral Hemispheres.” Nobel Lecture of 8 December 1981 The Nobel Foundation 1981 www.nobelprize.org


  • View in gallery
    A domino of buttons in relief . . .
  • View in gallery
    . . . and its complementary domino (or, perhaps, the same?).
  • View in gallery
  • View in gallery
    Each of the eight diagrams shows the strength of the response of the same population of neurons of the primary motor area M1 when a monkey performs a movement (with a two-dimensional joystick) in the direction shown by the corresponding arrow in the center diagram. Each neuronal discharge is represented by a vector pointing in the direction of the preferred direction of this neuron, the length of which is proportional to the discharge rate of the neuron. The vectorial sum of all these individual discharges is displayed as a dotted vector, which is shown to point very near the actual direction of the monkey’s movement. After Georgopoulos et al. (1983), with permission.
  • View in gallery
    Human intentionality in a Bayesian perspective. After the selection of the most probable interpretation of the sensory data through a Bayesian protocol comparing the sensory data with a memorized repertoire of similar inputs, this interpretation is transmitted to the decision centers where it is compared to the repertoire of the possible actions (a step where again the memory plays a crucial role). The final decision depends on the expected gain for each possible decision. After Ernst and Bültoff (2004), with permission, and Stanislas Dehaenne (2012), Cours du Collège de France.
  • View in gallery
  • View in gallery


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 57 57 8
Full Text Views 86 86 54
PDF Downloads 7 7 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0