Facing the Eternal Desert: Sociotemporal Values in Old English Poetry

in KronoScope
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Time is a singular noun, but includes a multiplicity of temporalities, including what J. T. Fraser has termed sociotemporality. In this paper, I discuss facing the urgency of time in a narrative dominated by sociotemporality, that of the Old English poem Beowulf, and suggest how criticism of the narrative structure of Beowulf has derived from a monovalent understanding of narrative time. Moreover, in recognizing sociotemporality as dominant in the organization of the poem, the modern reader can gain greater access to what was valued in the social context of its response to “the urgency of time.”

Facing the Eternal Desert: Sociotemporal Values in Old English Poetry

in KronoScope

Sections

References

AbbottH. Porter. 2002. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

AlexanderM. trans. Revised 2003. Beowulf A Verse Translation. London: Penguin.

AultmanM. 2009. “Nootemporality, Sociotemporality, and the Internet.” Kronoscope 9 (1-2): 129-145.

BjorkR. E. & J. D. Niles eds. 1997. A Beowulf Handbook. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

BlomfieldJ. 1938. “The Style and Structure of Beowulf. ” Review of English Studies XIV: 396-403.

British Library Collection Items BeowulfSeptember2016. http://www.bl.uk/collection-items/beowulf

CalderD. G. ed. 1979. Old English Poetry Essays on Style. Berkeley: University of California Press.

DavisK. 2012. “Time.” In A Handbook of Anglo-Saxon Studies edited by J. Stodnick and R. R. Trilling215-234. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

EarlJ. W. 2006. “Afterword: Reading Beowulf with Original Eyes.” In The Postmodern Beowulf edited by E. A. Joy & M. K. Ramsey687-704. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.

Electronic Beowulf2015. Online Fourth Edition edited by K. Kiernanprogrammed by I. E. Iacob. Sponsored by the British Library and the University of Kentucky. http://ebeowulf.uky.edu/ebeo4.0/start.html.

FrantzenA. J. 1990. Desire for Origins. New Brunswick & London: Rutgers University Press.

FraserJ. T. 2004. “List of Publications.” Kronoscope 4 (1): 185-196.

FraserJ. T. 2007. Time and Time Again: Reports from a Boundary of the Universe. Leiden &Boston: Brill.

FulkR. D.R. E. Bjork and J. D. Niles2008. Klaeber’s Beowulf. Fourth edition. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press.

HarbusA. 2012. Cognitive Approaches to Old English Poetry. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.

HeaneyS. 2000. Beowulf: A New Verse Translation. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company.

HermanD.M. Jahn and M-L. Ryan eds. 2005. Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London & New York: Routledge.

HermanD. ed. 2011. The Emergence of Mind Representations of Consciousness in Narrative Discourse in English. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.

Hernstein SmithB. 1980. “Narrative Versions, Narrative Theories.” Critical Inquiry 7: 209-218.

HuismanR. 1989. “The Three Tellings of Beowulf’s Fight with Grendel’s Mother.” Leeds Studies n.s. 20: 217-248.

HuismanR. (1998) 2000. The Written Poem: Semiotic Conventions from Old to Modern English. London and New York: Cassell/Continuum.

HuismanR. 2005. “Narrative concepts” and “From structuralism to post-structuralism.” In Narrative and MediaH. Fultonet al.11-44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

HuismanR. 2008. “Narrative sociotemporality and complementary gender roles in Anglo-Saxon society: the relevance of wifmann and wæpnedmann to a plot summary of the Old English poem Beowulf. ” Journal of the Australian Early Medieval Association 4:125-137.

HuismanR. 2013. “The Origins of Language and Narrative Temporalities.” In Origins and Futures: Time Inflected and Reflected edited by Raji C. Steineck & Claudia Clausius49-76. Leiden & Boston: Brill.

HuismanR. 2015. “How Do You Write about What Is Not There? How Do You Record What Is Absent? Scraping the Temporal Palimpsest in Auster’s Fiction.” In Time Narrative and Imagination: essays on Paul Auster edited by A. Misztal271-291. Gdansk: Gdansk University Press.

IrvineM. 1994. The Making of Textual Culture ‘Grammatica’ and Literary Theory 350-1100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

IrvingE. B. 1989. Rereading Beowulf. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

KlaeberFr. ed. 1950. Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg. Third Edition. Boston: D.C. Heath & Company.

LapidgeM. 2001. “Beowulf and Perception.” Proceedings of the British Academy 111:61-97.

LeyerleJ. 1967. “The Interlace Structure of Beowulf.” University of Toronto Quarterly 37:1-17.

LiuzzaR. M. (2000) 2013. Beowulf. 2nd Ed. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.

MarvellAndrew. (First published 1681) 1996. “To His Coy Mistress.” In The Norton Anthology of Poetry4th ed edited by M. FergusonM. J. Salter and J. Stallworthy435-436. New York & London: W.W. Norton & Company.

NilesJ. D. 1983. BeowulfThe Poem and Its Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

NünningA. 2003. “Narratology or Narratologies? Taking Stock of Recent Development, Critique and Modest Proposals for Future Usages of the Term.” In What is Narratology? edited by T. Kindt and H.-H. Müller238-275. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

O’DonoghueH. 2001. Beowulf : A New Verse Translation by R. M. Liuzza.” Translation and Literature 10:250-254.

OrchardA. 2003. A Critical Companion to Beowulf. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.

OveringG. R. 1990. Language Sign and Gender in Beowulf. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

OveringG. R. 2013. Beowulf: a poem in our time.” In The Cambridge History of Early Medieval English Literature edited by C. A. Lees309-331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

RisdenE. L. and N. Haydock. 2013. Beowulf on Film. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company.

RobinsonF. C. 1985. Beowulf and the Appositive Style. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

RyanM-L. 2007. “Towards a definition of narrative.” In The Cambridge Companion to Narrative edited by David Herman22-35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

TolkienJ. R. R. 1936. Beowulf: the Monsters and the Critics. London: Oxford University Press.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 66 66 3
Full Text Views 5 5 5
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0