Time is a singular noun, but includes a multiplicity of temporalities, including what J. T. Fraser has termed sociotemporality. In this paper, I discuss facing the urgency of time in a narrative dominated by sociotemporality, that of the Old English poem Beowulf, and suggest how criticism of the narrative structure of Beowulf has derived from a monovalent understanding of narrative time. Moreover, in recognizing sociotemporality as dominant in the organization of the poem, the modern reader can gain greater access to what was valued in the social context of its response to “the urgency of time.”
HuismanR.2008. “Narrative sociotemporality and complementary gender roles in Anglo-Saxon society: the relevance of wifmann and wæpnedmann to a plot summary of the Old English poem Beowulf. ”Journal of the Australian Early Medieval Association4:125-137.
HuismanR.2015. “How Do You Write about What Is Not There? How Do You Record What Is Absent? Scraping the Temporal Palimpsest in Auster’s Fiction.” In Time Narrative and Imagination: essays on Paul Auster edited by A.Misztal271-291. Gdansk: Gdansk University Press.
MarvellAndrew.(First published 1681)1996. “To His Coy Mistress.” In The Norton Anthology of Poetry4th ed edited by M.FergusonM. J.Salter and J.Stallworthy435-436. New York & London: W.W. Norton & Company.
NünningA.2003. “Narratology or Narratologies? Taking Stock of Recent Development, Critique and Modest Proposals for Future Usages of the Term.” In What is Narratology? edited by T.Kindt and H.-H.Müller238-275. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.