This article explores the potential of a new generation of environmental god games, or Gaia games, to engage with the ambivalent dynamic of Anthropocene temporality, a concept modelled after Nicolas Mirzoeff’s notion of Anthropocene visuality. In particular, this article highlights a trope that has become popular in god games recently: the move from map-style interfaces to the use of whole Earth images and models. This trope signals an overt and growing—although as I shall point out, imperfect—engagement with planetarity: an emerging worldview that posits the planet as a world-ecology, one that imbeds both human and nonhuman forces while calling for a renewed attendance to the ethics and aesthetics of relationality. At the same time, this article also notes the perpetuation in Gaia games of generic tropes and conventions like the tech tree and expansionist gameplay. The notion of Anthropocene temporality that this article attempts to theorize helps us to think through the juxtaposition between ecological relationality and a continued desire for expansionism and progress, as both of these play out in videogames.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abraham, Benjamin and Darshana Jayemanne. 2017. “Where are all the Climate Change Games? Locating Digital Games’ Response to Climate Change,” Transformations 30: 74-94.
Bastian, Michelle. 2012. “Fatally Confused: Telling the Time in the Midst of Ecological Crises,” Environmental Philosophy 9, no.1: 23-48.
Before We Leave. 2020. Balancing Monkey Games.
Boes, Tobias. 2014. “Beyond Whole Earth: Planetary Mediation and the Anthropocene,” Environmental Humanities 5, no. 1: 155-170.
Bogost, Ian. 2006. Unit Operations. MIT University Press.
Chang, Alenda Y. 2017. Green Computer and Video Games, edited by Alenda Chang and John Parham. Ecozon@ 8, no. 2.
Chang, Alenda Y. 2019. Playing Nature: Ecology in Video Games. University of Minnesota Press.
Crytivo. 2014. “The Universim Kickstarter Trailer” on YouTube.com, 23 April 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MvjJMQ2I84.
DeLoughrey, Elizabeth. 2014. “Satellite Planetarity and the Ends of the Earth,” Public Culture 26, no. 2: 257-280.
Elias, Amy J. 2012. “The Dialogical Avant-Garde: Relational Aesthetics and Time Ecologies in ‘Only Revolutions’ and TOC,” Contemporary Literature, vol. 53.4: 738-778.
Elias, Amy J. and Christian Moraru. 2015. The Planetary Turn: Relationality and Geoaesthetics in the Twenty-First Century. Northwestern University Press.
Ghosh, Amitav. 2016. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. The University of Chicago Press.
Ghys, Tuur. 2012. “Technology Trees: Freedom and Determinism in Historical Strategy Games,” Game Studies, vol. 12.1: np.
Heise, Ursula K. 2008. Sense of Place Sense of Planet. Oxford University Press.
Horn, Eva and Hannes Bergthaller. 2019. The Anthropocene: Key Issues for the Humanities. Routledge.
Houser, Heather. 2016. “Human/Planetary,” in Time: A Vocabulary of the Present, edited by Joel Burges and Amy J. Elias. New York University Press.
Imagine Earth. “Imagine Earth—Story Trailer” on YouTube.com, 1 April 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACYxP2wIMBE.
Imagine Earth. 2020. Serious Brothers. Early Access.
Jørgensen, Dolly. 2019. “Dependence on the whale: multispecies entanglements and ecosystem services in science fiction,” Green Letters 23, no. 1: 54-67.
Kalland, Arne. 2009. Unveiling the Whale. Berghahn Books.
Kunzelman, Cameron. “Can Play Save Us?,” in Postscript. Vice.com, 18 November 2016. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8gxkbg/can-play-save-us.
Mertens, Mahlu and Craps, Stef. 2018. “Contemporary Fiction vs. the Challenge of Imagining the Timescale of Climate Change,” Studies in the Novel 50, no. 1: 134-153.
Milburn, Colin. 2018. Respawn: Gamers, Hackers, and Technogenic Life. Duke University Press.
Mirzoeff, Nicholas. 2011. “The Clash of Visualizations: Counterinsurgency and Climate Change,” Social Research 78, no. 4 (winter): 1185-1210.
Mirzoeff, Nicholas. 2014. “Visualizing the Anthropocene,” Public Culture 26, no. 2: 213-232.
Park, Gene. 2020. “So you want to be a gamer. Here’s how you can start” Washington Post, 27 March 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/2020/03/27/so-you-want-be-gamer-heres-how-you-can-start/.
Raessens, Joost. 2019. “Collapsus, or how to make players become ecological citizens,” in The Playful Citizen: Civic Engagement in a Mediatized Culture, edited by René Glas, Sybille Lammes, Michiel de Lange, Joost Raessens, Imar de Vries. Amsterdam University Press.
Raessens, Joost. 2018. “Ecogames—Playing to save the planet,” in Cultural Sustainability: Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences, edited by Torsten Meireis and Gabriele Rippl. Routledge.
Robbins, Bruce. 2002. “The Sweatshop Sublime,” PLMA 117, no. 1 (January): 84-97.
Schiesel, Seth. 2020. “For the Uninitiated and Bored, an Introduction to the World of Gaming” The New York Times, 1 April 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/01/arts/gaming-introduction-basics-quarantine-coronavirus.html.
Schrape, Niklas. 2014. “Gaia’s Game,” Communication+1 3, no.1: np.
Scully-Blaker, Rainforest. 2019. “Buying Time: Capitalist Temporalities in Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp,” Loading … The Journal of the Canadian Game Studies Association 12, no. 20: 90-106.
SimEarth. 1990. Will Wright. Maxis. Played using online emulator at https://playclassic.games/games/simulation-dos-games-online/play-simearth-the-living-planet-online/.
Slocombe, Will, 2019. “Playing Games with Technology: Fictions of Science in the Civilization Series,” Osiris 34: 158-174.
Snider, Mike. 2020. “Video games can be a healthy social pastime during coronavirus pandemic” USAtoday.com, 29 March 2020. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/tech/gaming/2020/03/28/video-games-whos-prescription-solace-during-coronavirus-pandemic/2932976001/.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2012. “Imperative to Re-Imagine the Planet,” in An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization. Harvard University Press.
Spore. 2008. Will Wright. Maxis. Electronic Arts.
The Universim. 2020. Crytivo. Early Access.
Wark, McKenzie. 2007. Gamer Theory. Harvard University Press.
Wark, McKenzie. 1994. “Third Nature,” Cultural Studies 8, no 1: 115:132.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1764 | 478 | 45 |
Full Text Views | 124 | 28 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 351 | 169 | 0 |
This article explores the potential of a new generation of environmental god games, or Gaia games, to engage with the ambivalent dynamic of Anthropocene temporality, a concept modelled after Nicolas Mirzoeff’s notion of Anthropocene visuality. In particular, this article highlights a trope that has become popular in god games recently: the move from map-style interfaces to the use of whole Earth images and models. This trope signals an overt and growing—although as I shall point out, imperfect—engagement with planetarity: an emerging worldview that posits the planet as a world-ecology, one that imbeds both human and nonhuman forces while calling for a renewed attendance to the ethics and aesthetics of relationality. At the same time, this article also notes the perpetuation in Gaia games of generic tropes and conventions like the tech tree and expansionist gameplay. The notion of Anthropocene temporality that this article attempts to theorize helps us to think through the juxtaposition between ecological relationality and a continued desire for expansionism and progress, as both of these play out in videogames.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1764 | 478 | 45 |
Full Text Views | 124 | 28 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 351 | 169 | 0 |