Much has been written about “judicial dialogue” in international law. This article explores a related, but much less studied, concept: “dialogue” between judges and scholars. Through examples taken from the International Court of Justice, the article proposes a classification of such dialogue and argues that it plays an important role in the development of international law.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 358 | 64 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 241 | 10 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 79 | 29 | 0 |
Much has been written about “judicial dialogue” in international law. This article explores a related, but much less studied, concept: “dialogue” between judges and scholars. Through examples taken from the International Court of Justice, the article proposes a classification of such dialogue and argues that it plays an important role in the development of international law.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 358 | 64 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 241 | 10 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 79 | 29 | 0 |