Schmerzensgeld und actio iniuriarum aestimatoria

Der Fall Van Kreuningen/Bessem


in Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Compensation for non-pecuniary loss and the actio aestimatoria, The case of Van Kreuningen/Bessem. – In the case Van Kreuningen/Bessem of 1943, the Roman actio iniuriarum (aestimatoria) was used as an argument in favour of granting compensation for non-pecuniary loss. This is surprising for a number of reasons, not least because it was a penal action. In this article, the action and its value as an argument is studied in the wider context of the history of compensation for pain, suffering and disfigurement in Dutch law before and after the codification of 1838.


Schmerzensgeld und actio iniuriarum aestimatoria

Der Fall Van Kreuningen/Bessem


in Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review

References

12

NJ 1943455S. 617. Das Adjektiv aestimatoria wird von Kaser (Römisches Privatrecht i S. 625 Fn. 27) als ‘quellenfremd’ bezeichnet. Es beruht auf Gellius Noctes Atticae 20113 und 20137 wo zweimal von (de) iniuriis aestimandis die Rede ist. Drucker (oben Fn. 8) hat es übrigens in seinem Aufsatz nicht benutzt; er spricht einfach von der actio iniuriarum.

22

Sp. 1373.

39

Siehe W. 9099 (1911) S. 1–3.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 25 25 12
Full Text Views 62 62 53
PDF Downloads 6 6 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0