Save
Author: Pia Reetz1
View More View Less
  • 1 Universität Bonn, Fachbereich Rechtswissenschaft, Institut für Römisches Recht und Vergleichende Rechtsgeschichte, Adenauerallee 24-42, D-53113 Bonn, Deutschland
pia.reetz@uni-bonn.de

Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

The German civil code (BGB) establishes that the creditor defaults when he delays his acceptance, regardless of the question of fault. Since the creditor is still obliged to pay the debtor, the creditor only harms himself by not accepting performance. On the other hand, it is stated in the special section of the BGB that the emptor is not entitled to reject performance. With regard to the question as to whether such an obligation was known in classical Roman law, the source material remains ambiguous. But the relevant fragments can be systematized to the extent that they aim to balance the conflicting interests of creditor and debtor. In comparing the solution according to classical Roman law with the legal position of the BGB, the interplay between the provision on creditor’s delay and the emptor’s duty to accept performance result in a legal solution which is quite similar to the balance of interests found in classical ­Roman law even though it is based on a different legal ideology.


Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 252 59 1
Full Text Views 248 4 0
PDF Views & Downloads 34 16 0