Statuti e cultura giuridica
Bergamo, Alberico da Rosciate e una quaestio sulla pace privata
In: Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'histoire du droit / The Legal History ReviewSearch for other papers by Marta Cerrito in
Current site
Google Scholar
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the crucial role of legal science for the practical side of the law, while analyzing in detail the statutes’ reform of Bergamo (1331). Indeed, the paper discusses the relationship between learned law and practical law during the period of ius commune through the analysis of some relevant quaestiones disputatae regarding criminal transactions. The author seeks to analyze the relationship between the ius puniendi of public authorities and private autonomy in the resolution of criminal cases focusing not only on the Roman sources (C. 2,4,18) but also on the quaestiones ex facto emergentes contained in the collections of Alberto Gandino, Alberico da Rosciate, Alberto Galeotti and Guglielmo Durante.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 288 | 32 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 192 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 39 | 2 | 0 |
Statuti e cultura giuridica
Bergamo, Alberico da Rosciate e una quaestio sulla pace privata
In: Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'histoire du droit / The Legal History ReviewSearch for other papers by Marta Cerrito in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the crucial role of legal science for the practical side of the law, while analyzing in detail the statutes’ reform of Bergamo (1331). Indeed, the paper discusses the relationship between learned law and practical law during the period of ius commune through the analysis of some relevant quaestiones disputatae regarding criminal transactions. The author seeks to analyze the relationship between the ius puniendi of public authorities and private autonomy in the resolution of criminal cases focusing not only on the Roman sources (C. 2,4,18) but also on the quaestiones ex facto emergentes contained in the collections of Alberto Gandino, Alberico da Rosciate, Alberto Galeotti and Guglielmo Durante.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 288 | 32 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 192 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 39 | 2 | 0 |