Recent research in the history of international law


in Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This review article treats the booming scholarship on the history of international law over the past decade. Works with a broader view (1), including the recent big-book syntheses and collective works, are contrasted with monographs (2), from studies of treaties and doctrine, over diplomatic practice to scholarship by historians and, finally, interdisciplinary scholarship. This texts provides a personal panorama of the wide array of scholarly perspectives on a common object: rules recognised in the community or society of states. New insights from history and social sciences, especially the turn to global history, open fresh prospects for ‘traditional’ legal historical research. Studying the encounter between ‘European’ international law and other continents rises our indispensable intercultural awareness. Yet, it should also serve to better understand the specificity of European legal thinking or diplomatic practice, and does not render research on the latter obsolete or redundant.


Recent research in the history of international law


in Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review

Sections

References

  • 17

     GaurierHistoire du droit international (supra n. 9) p. 459. Human rights pre-exist the internal legal order as a bundle of inalienable subjective rights. However their transubstantiation into positive law has only been effectuated at the internal level (save the cases of the European or Latin-American Courts of Human Rights). In the international legal order claims formulated as human rights are not yet universally enforceable (p. 461). In order to arrive at a situation of cosmopolitan or universal human rights Gaurier starts from these realist findings linking them to the dangers of perceived Western cultural dominance or hegemony. His reading of Kant is thus in no way utopian.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

     GaurierHistoire du droit international (supra n. 9) p. 623.

  • 27

     GaurierHistoire du droit international (supra n. 9) p. 378.

  • 28

     GaurierHistoire du droit international (supra n. 9) p. 1098.

  • 29

     GaurierHistoire du droit international (supra n. 9) p. 546–553.

  • 39

     Fassbender and PetersIntroduction (supra n. 37) p. 2.

  • 73

     OtteThe Foreign Office mind (supra n. 65) p. 2.

  • 85

     D. ArmitageFoundations of modern international thoughtCambridge 2012 p. 24; D. ­Ivison Non-cosmopolitan universalism: on Armitage’s Foundations of international political thought History of European ideas 41 (2015) p. 78–88.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 104

     NeffJustice among nations (supra n. 6) p. 479.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 64 58 5
Full Text Views 181 181 1
PDF Downloads 9 9 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0