When Revolutionary Coalitions Break Down: Polarization, Protest, and the Tunisian Political Crisis of August 2013
In: Middle East Law and GovernanceRevolutionary coalitions often break down in the aftermath of revolution, leading to the collapse of transitional governments. Fragmentation among revolutionary elites has been extensively theorized, but few works consider the origins and consequences of polarization among non-elite protesters in the revolutionary coalition. This paper examines the case of Tunisia to unpack how polarization among former revolutionaries may drive secondary waves of mobilization that imperil governing coalitions, even when elites are cooperating. Unique protest surveys of pro- and anti-government demonstrations during the Tunisian political crisis of 2013 – which catalyzed the resignation of the country’s first elected assembly – show that polarization within this coalition occurred along ideological lines concerning the role of Islam in governance but not along class lines, as some theories of transition would predict. Revolutionaries are re-mobilized in part through divergent narratives concerning which social groups participated most in the revolutionary struggle, and which groups suffered and profited most under the old regime. This paper counters the elite-centrism of predominant “transitology” approaches by highlighting how protest politics may shape institutional transitions.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Aminzade Ron , Goldstone Jack A. , and Perry Elizabeth J. . “Leadership Dynamics and Dynamics of Contention.” In Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics , edited by Aminzade Ron , 126–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
-
Angrist Michele Penner . “Understanding the Success of Mass Civic Protest in Tunisia.” Middle East Journal 67, no. 4 (2013): 547–64.
-
Beissinger Mark R. “The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution.” American Political Science Review 107 no. 3 (2013): 547–92.
-
Beissinger Mark R. , Jamal Amaney A. , and Mazur Kevin . “Explaining Divergent Revolutionary Coalitions: Regime Strategies and the Structuring of Participation in the Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions.” The Journal of Comparative Politics 48, no. 1 (2015): 1–21.
-
Bellin Eva . Stalled Democracy: Capital, Labor, and the Paradox of State-Sponsored Development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
-
Bennett Lance W. and Segerberg Alexandra . The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
-
Benford Robert D. and Snow David A. . “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (2000): 611–39.
-
Bishara Dina . “Labor Movements in Tunisia and Egypt: Drivers vs. Objects of Change in Transition from Authoritarian Rule.” Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Comments, 2014.
-
Brinton Crane . The Anatomy of Revolution . New York: Prentice Hall, 1938.
-
Boubekeur Amel . “Islamists, Secularists, and Old Regime Elites in Tunisia: Bargained Competition.” Mediterranean Politics 21, no. 1 (2016): 107–27.
-
Cavatorta Francesco , and Merone Fabio . “Moderation Through Exclusion? The Journey of the Tunisian Ennahda from Fundamentalist to Conservative Party.” Democratization 20, no. 5 (2013): 857–75.
-
Chadwick Andrew . Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
-
Chenowith Erica , and Stephan Maria J. . Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict . New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
-
Chomiak Laryssa . “The Making of a Revolution in Tunisia.” Middle East Law and Governance 3 (2011): 68–83.
-
Chomiak Laryssa . “Architecture of Resistance in Tunisia.” In Taking to the Streets: The Transformation of Arab Activism , edited by Lust Ellen and Khatib Lina . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.
-
Collier Ruth Berins . Paths Towards Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America . Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
-
Dalmasso Emanuela , and Cavatorta Francesco . “Democracy, Civil Liberties, and the Role of Religion after the Arab Awakening: Constitutional Reforms in Tunisia and Morocco.” Mediterranean Politics 18, no. 2 (2013): 225–41.
-
Dix Robert H. “Why Revolutions Succeed and Fail.” Polity 16, no. 3 (1984): 423–46.
-
Fishman Robert M. “How Civil Society Matters in Democratization: Setting the Boundaries of Post-Transition Inclusion.” Journal of Comparative Politics 49 no. 3 (2017): 391–409.
-
Foran John , and Goodwin Jeff . “Revolutionary Outcomes in Iran and Nicaragua: Coalition Fragmentation, War, and the Limits of Social Transformation.” Theory and Society 22 no. 2 (1993): 209–47.
-
Gelman Andrew , and King Garry , “Why Are American Presidential Campaign Polls so Variable When Votes Are so Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science 23, no. 4 (1993): 409–51.
-
George Alexander L. , and Bennett Andrew . Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences . Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 2005.
-
Ghrib Baccar , and Makni Ayssen . “Economie Politique de la Transition Democratique” [Political Economy of the Democratic Transition]. In La Transition Democratique en Tunisie: Etats des Lieux [The Democratic Transition in Tunisia: An Overview], edited by Redissi H. , Nouira A. , and Zghal A. . Tunis: Karthala, 2012.
-
Glenn John K. “Contentious Politics and Democratization: Comparing the Impact of Social Movements on the Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe.” Political Studies 51 (2003): 103–20.
-
Goldstone Jack A. Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.
-
Goldstone Jack A . “Comparative Historical Analysis and Knowledge Accumulation in the Study of Revolutions.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney James and Rueschmeyer Dietrich . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
-
Goldstone Jack A. “Rethinking Revolutions: Integrating Origins, Processes, and Outcomes.”Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa, and the Middle East 29, no. 1 (2009): 18–32.
-
Goldstone Jack A. “Cross-Class Coalitions and the Making of the Arab Revolts of 2011.” Swiss Political Science Review 17, no. 4 (2011).
-
Gurr Ted Robert . Why Men Rebel . Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.
-
Hale Henry E. “Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia.” World Politics 58, no. 1 (2005): 133–65.
-
Hartshorn Iam M. “Organized Interests in Constitutional Assemblies: Egypt and Tunisia in Comparison.” Political Research Quarterly 70, no. 2 (2017): 408–20.
-
Haugbolle Rikke Hostrup , and Cavatorta Francesco . “Will the Real Tunisian Opposition Please Stand Up? Opposition Coordination Failures under Authoritarian Constraints.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 38, no. 3 (2011): 323–41.
-
Hibou Beatrice . “Domination and Control in Tunisia: Economic Levers for the Exercise of Authoritarian Power.” Review of African Political Economy 33, no. 108 (2006): 185–206.
-
Huntington Samuel . Political Order in Changing Societies . New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.
-
Johnson Chalmers . Revolutionary Change . Boston: Little Brown, 1966.
-
Kitschelt Herbert . “Political Opportunity Structure and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Activism in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science. 16, no. 1 (1986): 57–85.
-
Kurzman Charles . “The Arab Spring Uncoiled.” Mobilization 17, no. 4 (2012): 377–90.
-
Lachmann Richard . “Agents of Revolution: Elite Conflicts and Mass Mobilization from the Medici to Yeltsin.” In Theorizing Revolutions , edited by Foran John . London: Routledge, 2000.
-
Lawrence Adria . “Repression and Activism among the Arab Spring’s First Movers: Evidence from Morocco’s February 20th Movement.” British Journal of Political Science 47, no. 3 (2017): 699–718.
-
Lynch Mark . The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolutions of the New Middle East . New York: Public Affairs, 2012.
-
Marzouki Nadia . “The Call for Dignity, or a Particular Universalism.” Middle East Law and Governance 3 (2011): 148–58.
-
Matsuzato Kimitaka . “Political Turmoil in the Northwestern Black Sea Rim: Ukraine, Moldova, and Transdniestria.” In After the Color Revolutions: Political Change and Democracy Promotion in Eurasia.” PONARS Eurasia, July 2010.
-
McAdam Doug , Tilly Charles , and Tarrow Sidney . Dynamics of Contention . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
-
Moore Barrington . Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy . Boston: Beacon Press, 1966.
-
Nepstad Sharon Erickson . Nonviolent Revolutions: Civil Resistance in the Late 20th Century . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
-
Petersen Roger D. Resistance and Rebellion: Lessons from Eastern Europe . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
-
Perkins Kenneth . A History of Modern Tunisia, Second Edition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
-
Polletta Francesca . It Was Like A Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
-
Selbin Eric . Revolution, Rebellion, Resistance: The Power of Story . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
-
Sewell William H. “Historical Events as Transformations of Structures: Inventing Revolution at the Bastille.”Theory and Society 25, no. 6 (1996): 841–81.
-
Skocpol Theda . States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
-
Slater Dan . “Democratic Careening.” World Politics 65, no. 4 (2013): 729–62.
-
Tarrow Sidney G. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
-
Tilly Charles . From Mobilization to Revolution . Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
-
Thompson Mark R. Democratic Revolutions: Asia and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge, 2004.
-
Tufekci Zeynep , and Wilson Christopher . “Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square.” Journal of Communication 62, no. 2 (2012): 363–79.
-
Walgrave Segaan , and Verlhulst Joris , “Selection and Response Bias in Protest Surveys.” Mobilization 16, no. 2 (2011): 203–22.
-
Weipert-Fenner Irene . “Unemployed Mobilization in Times of Democratization: The Union of Unemployed Graduates in Post-Ben Ali Tunisia.” The Journal of North African Studies (2018): 1–22.
-
World Bank . The Unfinished Revolution: Bringing Opportunity, Good Jobs, and Greater Wealth to all Tunisians Report No. 86179-TN.
-
H. Yousfi L’UGTT, une passion tunisienne : enquete sur les syndicalistes en révolution , 2011–2014. Tunis: IRMC-Med Ali, 2015.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 928 | 219 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 100 | 15 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 118 | 27 | 0 |
When Revolutionary Coalitions Break Down: Polarization, Protest, and the Tunisian Political Crisis of August 2013
In: Middle East Law and GovernanceRevolutionary coalitions often break down in the aftermath of revolution, leading to the collapse of transitional governments. Fragmentation among revolutionary elites has been extensively theorized, but few works consider the origins and consequences of polarization among non-elite protesters in the revolutionary coalition. This paper examines the case of Tunisia to unpack how polarization among former revolutionaries may drive secondary waves of mobilization that imperil governing coalitions, even when elites are cooperating. Unique protest surveys of pro- and anti-government demonstrations during the Tunisian political crisis of 2013 – which catalyzed the resignation of the country’s first elected assembly – show that polarization within this coalition occurred along ideological lines concerning the role of Islam in governance but not along class lines, as some theories of transition would predict. Revolutionaries are re-mobilized in part through divergent narratives concerning which social groups participated most in the revolutionary struggle, and which groups suffered and profited most under the old regime. This paper counters the elite-centrism of predominant “transitology” approaches by highlighting how protest politics may shape institutional transitions.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 928 | 219 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 100 | 15 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 118 | 27 | 0 |