Save

Exclusion and Violence After the Egyptian Coup

In: Middle East Law and Governance
Authors:
Steven Brooke University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, US, sbrooke@wisc.edu

Search for other papers by Steven Brooke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Elizabeth R. Nugent Yale University, New Haven, CT, US, elizabeth.nugent@yale.edu

Search for other papers by Elizabeth R. Nugent in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Scholars of Islamism have long grappled with the relationship between political participation and ideological change, theorizing that political exclusion and state repression increase the likelihood of Islamist groups using violence. The trajectory of post-2011 Egypt offers a chance to systematically evaluate these theories using subnational data. Pairing district-level electoral returns from pre-coup presidential elections with post-coup levels of anti-state and sectarian violence, we find that districts where Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated candidate Mohammed Morsi performed well in 2012 witnessed more anti-state and sectarian (anti-Christian) violence following the 2013 military coup. The same relationship holds for the performance of liberal Islamist Abdel Moneim Abu El-Fotouh, which is consistent with arguments that political exclusion alone may also drive violence.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1010 165 34
Full Text Views 119 20 2
PDF Views & Downloads 177 35 3