Representing the Nation Horizontally and Vertically

Identity Differences and Asymmetries of Power in Mauritania

in Middle East Law and Governance
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


This article retraces the parallel and contrasting developments of state formation and of citizenship in Mauritania, recasting the reflection on postcolonial and anthropological debates on citizenship and state and civil society. In this perspective, cultural, ethnic and even “racial” differences – such as the Arabs/Africans or White/Black peoples dichotomies – have alternatively been considered as a social resource for consolidating a postcolonial nation or a threat to social harmony and to political development. The article deconstructs both of these positions in order to show their common features in their tendency to reduce state and civil society relationships to a matter of “horizontal” interactions between social groups. The hypothesis is that these visions have historically played a depoliticizing role, hiding the “vertical” dimension of relationships between hegemonic governing elites and social groups that are economically and socially fragmented, hierarchized, and even discriminated against. The article proceeds in three steps. First, it shows the way in which issues of identity are highly sensitive in contemporary Mauritania, relying particularly on a recent case of ethnic discrimination during a census campaign. It then retraces the evolution of political and intellectual debates on identities in Mauritanian society, putting them in perspective with the evolution of political power or of the political interests and views of social and political actors. Finally, it relies on historical and ethnographic records about a particular social group (a pastoral Fulani lineage), which does not fit into usual ethnic categories and dichotomies, and by that ultimately shows the political value of discourses on identity.

Representing the Nation Horizontally and Vertically

Identity Differences and Asymmetries of Power in Mauritania

in Middle East Law and Governance




Jean Schmitz“Le fleuve Sénégal: ligne de front ou voie de passage,” Afrique Contemporaine no. 154 (1990): 70–73; Olivier Leservoisier “Histoire du peuplement et rapports fonciers à Kaédi (Gorgol Mauritanie) de l’époque des Farba à la conquête coloniale” Islam et sociétés au Sud du Sahara no. 7 (1993): 133–143.


Tim Cleveland“Islam and the Construction of Social Identity in the Nineteenth Century Sahara,” Journal of African History 39 no. 3 (1998): 365–366.


Jean Schmitz“Cités noires: les républiques villageoises du Fuuta Toro (vallée du fleuve Sénégal),” Cahiers d’Etudes AfricainesXXXIV 1–3 no. 133–135 (1994): 419–460.


Jean Schmitz“L’Internal Africa Frontier (1987) d’Igor Kopytoff et ses héritiers,” Séminaire FrontafriqueParis 11 April 2008.


Kopytoff 198728.


Riccardo Ciavolella“Orienting Fulani herders of Mauritania. Identity struggles, political marginalization and mobilization since 1950s islamization,” Maghreb Review 35 no. 3 (2010): 306–324.


Marchesin 1992.


Christian Santoir“Les Peuls “refusés”: Les peuls mauritaniens réfugiés au Sénégal (Département de Matam),” Cahiers de Sciences Humaines 26 no. 4 (1990): 580.


Riccardo Ciavolella“Entre démocratisations et coups d’état. Hégémonie et subalternité en Mauritanie,” Politique Africaine no. 114 (2009): 3–21; Riccardo Ciavolella “Huunde fof ko politik - Everything is politics. Gramsci Fulani and the State in Mauritania” Africa Today 58 no. 3 (2012): 2–21.


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 6
Full Text Views 105 105 61
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0