The Paradoxes of Codifying Islamic Criminal Law in the Maldives
In: Middle East Law and GovernanceSearch for other papers by Sohaira Z.M. Siddiqui in
Current site
Google Scholar
Utilizing the codification of Islamic Criminal law in the Maldives, this article argues that the process of codifying Islamic law often ignores classical conceptualizations of Islamic criminal law and judicial procedures established as preventative measures against the widespread implementation of Islamic criminal punishments (ḥudūd). Instead of recognizing the legal nuance in classical debates, reliance is placed on a narrow body of texts, and extracted rules are reformed for easy implementation and compliance with modern human rights standards. By ignoring classical discussions of Islamic criminal law, and adopting a singular conception of codification, a paradox emerges wherein the resulting criminal code is less punitive, but more enforceable than its classical counterpart. A second paradox is that on one hand religious legitimacy and moral credibility is desired through the implementation of an Islamic penal code, but on the other, controversial criminalized actions are assumed to be non-prosecutable.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 694 | 116 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 231 | 8 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 65 | 4 | 0 |
The Paradoxes of Codifying Islamic Criminal Law in the Maldives
In: Middle East Law and GovernanceSearch for other papers by Sohaira Z.M. Siddiqui in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Utilizing the codification of Islamic Criminal law in the Maldives, this article argues that the process of codifying Islamic law often ignores classical conceptualizations of Islamic criminal law and judicial procedures established as preventative measures against the widespread implementation of Islamic criminal punishments (ḥudūd). Instead of recognizing the legal nuance in classical debates, reliance is placed on a narrow body of texts, and extracted rules are reformed for easy implementation and compliance with modern human rights standards. By ignoring classical discussions of Islamic criminal law, and adopting a singular conception of codification, a paradox emerges wherein the resulting criminal code is less punitive, but more enforceable than its classical counterpart. A second paradox is that on one hand religious legitimacy and moral credibility is desired through the implementation of an Islamic penal code, but on the other, controversial criminalized actions are assumed to be non-prosecutable.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 694 | 116 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 231 | 8 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 65 | 4 | 0 |