Are There Two Accounts of Hylomorphism in Metaphysics Book H?

in Méthexis
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

In this paper I aim to challenge Gill’s reading of Aristotle’s Metaphysics H, according to which in this Book Aristotle would provide us with two different accounts of hylomorphism, the one grounded on matter’s actual thisness (H1–5), the other on matter’s potential thisness (H6). In particular, I try to show how the lines of the text where Gill’s detects the conflict between these two accounts – H1 1042a32–b3 – reveal how the analysis of the role played by matter in generation does not entail its actual thisness (by itself incompatible with the unity requirement of definition), but always (and only) the specific orientation that each matter has towards its actualization. On the basis of this suggestion, I try to sketch an alternative reading of H’s argument-structure, according to which Aristotle is mainly concerned with the distinction of hylomorphism from two different sorts of ontological reductionism: the materialistic one (H2–4–5) and the idealistic one (H3–H6).

Are There Two Accounts of Hylomorphism in Metaphysics Book H?

in Méthexis

Sections

References

Baghdassarian F. (2014) ‘Aristote, Métaphysique H5: La Génération des contraires et la matière’ in Elenchos xxxv fasc.1 Napoli Bibliopolis 2014 pp. 6188.

Barnes J. (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle The revised Oxford Translation2 vols. Princeton University PressPrinceton 1995.

Bostock D. (1994) Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Z and H Oxford Clarendon Press 1994.

Brunschwig J. (1979) ‘La Forme, prédicat de la matière’? in Aubenque P. (1979) Études sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote. Actes du vi Symposium Aristotelicum Paris Vrin 1979 pp. 131158.

Burnyeat M. . (1984) Notes on Book Eta and Theta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Oxford, SubFaculty of Philosophy 1984.

Burnyeat M. (2001) A Map of Metaphysics Zeta, Pittsburgh, Mathesis Publication 2001.

Gill M.L. (1989) Aristotle on Substance. The Paradox of UnityPrincetonPrinceton University Press 1989.

Gill M.L. (1996) ‘Metaphysics H 1–5 on Perceptible Substances’ in Rapp C. (1996) (ed.) Aristotle: Metaphysik Die Substanzbücher (ZHΘ)BerlinAkademie Verlag 1996 pp. 209228.

Gill M.L. (2010) ‘Unity of Definitions in Metaphysics H6 and Z12’ in Lennox J.G. Bolton R. (ed.) ‘Being Nature and Life in AristotleCambridge University Press 2010 pp. 97121.

Menn S. (unpub.) ‘The Aim and the Argument of Aristotle’s Metaphysicshttps://www.philosophie.hu-berlin.de/de/lehrbereiche/antike/mitarbeiter/menn/contents.

Morel P-M . (2015) Aristote. Métaphysique Èta. Vrin.

Ross W.D. (1924) Aristotle: Metaphysics2 vols. Oxford Clarendon Press 1924.

Yu J. (2003) The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s MetaphysicsKluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht-Boston-London 2003.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 12 12 5
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0