Sombras del eleatismo en la concepción del lenguaje: la refutación de Platón y Aristóteles al monismo lingüístico
Eleatic Shadows in the Conception of Language: Plato and Aristotle’s Refutation of Linguistic Monism
Search for other papers by Pilar Spangenberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The article studies two texts closely linked to each other. In the first place, the final lines of Physics I 2, a text in which Aristotle offers a refutation against positions that propose to modify the language to adapt it to a monistic semantics that, from his point of view, involves a reduction of the senses of being analogous to that of the Eleatic thinkers that he has been criticizing. Second, the refutation that the Eleatic Stranger offers to the linguistic monists who “deny the possibility of saying one thing through another” in Plato’s Sophist 251a-254e. It is particularly interesting to illuminate the link between such passages in order to exhibit not only important points of contact in their respective positions regarding the relationship between being and language, but also some significant differences in terms of the doctrines each one of them point to, which denotes a rich and extensive discussion held at the time around the problem of unity and multiplicity in their relationship with language.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ackrill, J. L. (1955) ‘Symploke Eidon’ in G. Vlastos (ed.) Plato, A Collection of Critical Essays, New York: 199–206.
-
Angioni, L. Aristóteles, Física I e ii. Prefácio, introdução, tradução e comentários. Campinas, Editora da UNICAMP, 2009.
-
Aubenque, P. Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1962.
-
Berti, E. Aristotele: dalla dialettica alla filosofia prima. Padova, Cedam, 1977.
-
Berti, E., Las razones de Aristóteles. Trad. H. A. Gianneschi y M. Monteverdi. Buenos Aires: Oinos, 2008.
-
Boeri, M.D. Aristóteles, Física I-ii. Traducción, introducción y comentarios. Buenos Aires, Biblos, 1993.
-
Boeri, M. (2006). ‘Aristóteles contra Parménides: el problema del cambio y la posibilidad de una ciencia física’. Tópicos,30 (bis), 45–68.
-
Bolton, R. (1991) ‘Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science: Physics I’. In Judson (ed.) Aristotle’s Physics. A Collection of Essays. Oxford, Clarendon Press: 1–30.
-
Bostock, D. (2006). ‘Aristotle on the Eleatics in Physics I 2–3’. En Space, Time, Matter and Form: Essays on Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 103–115.
-
Brancacci, A. Oikeios logos. La filosofía del linguaggio di Antistene. Napoli, Bibliopolis, 1990.
-
Brancacci, A. (1999). ‘Eutidemo e Dionisodoro, gli opsimatheis del Sofista e un passo dell’Eutidemo’. Elenchos 10: 381–396.
-
Carrasco Meza, C. (2017) ‘La justificación dialéctica de la refutación al eleatismo en Física I 2–3’, Revista de Filosofía 73: 9–27.
-
Castagnoli, J. L. (2010). Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Charlton, W. Aristotle´s Physics. Books I and ii. Translated with Introduction and Notes. Oxford, Oxford Clarendon Press, 1970.
-
Clarke, T. (2018) ‘Physics I 2’ en D. Quarantotto (ed.) Aristotle’s Physics Book I. A Systematic Exploration, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 60–81.
-
Cordero, N. L. (2000) ‘La participation comme être de la forme dans le Sophiste de Platon’, in N. L. Cordero (ed.) Ontologie et Dialogue, Mélanges en hommage à Pierre Aubenque, Paris, Vrin.
-
Cornford, F. M. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge, London, Kegan Paul and Co., Ltd, 1935, trad. esp. Barcelona 1983.
-
Crivelli, P. Plato’s Account of Falsehood: a Study of the Sophist. Cambridge-New York, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
-
Crombie, I. An Examination of Plato´s Doctrines, vol. ii, London, Routledge, 1963.
-
Denyer, N. Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy, London and New York, Routledge, 1993.
-
Dorion, L. A. Aristote, Les réfutations sophistiques. Introduction, traduction et commentaire. Paris, Vrin, 1995.
-
Duke, E. A. et al. Platonis Opera, vol. i. Oxford, Oxford Clarendon Press, 1995.
-
Frede, M. Prädikation und Existenzaussage. (Hypomnemata 18: 1–99) Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, Göttingen, 1967.
-
Fronterotta, F. Platone Sofista, Introduzione, traduzione e note. Milano, bur, 2007.
-
Giannantoni, G. Socrates et socraticorum reliquiae, 4. Vols., Napoli, Bibliopolis, 1990.
-
Giardina, G. I fondamenti della Fisica, Analisis critica di Aristotele, Phys. I. Symbolon, Catania. 2002.
-
Irwin, T. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
-
Jaeger, W. Aristotelis Metaphysica, recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1957.
-
Mansion, S. (1953) ‘Aristote, critique des Eléates’. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 51, 165–186.
-
Owen, G.E.L. (1961) ‘Tithénai tà phainómena, en Mansion, S (ed.) Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, Louvain, Peeters Publishers, 83–103.
-
Owen, G.E.L. (1970) ‘Plato on Not-Being’ In G. Vlastos (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Garden City, Doubleday: 223–67.
-
Ross, W.D. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. A revised text with introduction and commentary. Two vols. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1924.
-
Ross, W.D. Aristotle’s Physics. A revised text with introduction and commentary. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1936.
-
Rossi, G. (2001) ‘Algunas notas sobre la discusión con los Eléatas en Física I de Aristóteles’. Tópicos, 20: 137–159.
-
Spangenberg, P. (2018), ‘Antecedentes de algunos lineamientos de la estrategia de Aristóteles frente al negador del principio de no contradicción en el Sofista de Platón’, Élenchos, n. 38 (1–2), De Gruyter: 83–105.
-
Spangenberg, P. (2022) ‘Debates en torno al monismo lingüístico en el movimiento socrático’ en C. Mársico (ed.) Socrates and the Socratic Philosophies: Selected papers from Socratica iv. Sankt Augustin, Academia Verlag, 113–124.
-
Spangenberg, P. (2022b), ‘Aristas trascendentales en la argumentación de Aristóteles en favor de los primeros principios’, Tópicos 63, México: 265–302.
-
Waletzki, W. (1979). ‘Platons Ideenlehre und Dialektik im Sophistes 253d’. Phronesis, 24: 241–252.
-
Wieland, W. Die aristotelische Physik. Untersuchungen über die Grundlegung der Naturwissenschaft und die sprachlichen Bedingungen der Prinzipienforschung bei Aristoteles. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1962.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 193 | 105 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 59 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 92 | 4 | 0 |
Sombras del eleatismo en la concepción del lenguaje: la refutación de Platón y Aristóteles al monismo lingüístico
Eleatic Shadows in the Conception of Language: Plato and Aristotle’s Refutation of Linguistic Monism
Search for other papers by Pilar Spangenberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The article studies two texts closely linked to each other. In the first place, the final lines of Physics I 2, a text in which Aristotle offers a refutation against positions that propose to modify the language to adapt it to a monistic semantics that, from his point of view, involves a reduction of the senses of being analogous to that of the Eleatic thinkers that he has been criticizing. Second, the refutation that the Eleatic Stranger offers to the linguistic monists who “deny the possibility of saying one thing through another” in Plato’s Sophist 251a-254e. It is particularly interesting to illuminate the link between such passages in order to exhibit not only important points of contact in their respective positions regarding the relationship between being and language, but also some significant differences in terms of the doctrines each one of them point to, which denotes a rich and extensive discussion held at the time around the problem of unity and multiplicity in their relationship with language.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 193 | 105 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 59 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 92 | 4 | 0 |
