This paper questions the traditional interpretation of Plato’s Republic 515a5. When Socrates claims that the prisoners in the simile of the Cave are ‘like us’, he does not imply any sort of similarity or analogy between their cognitive state and ours. Rather, I argue he says that we should imagine a cave inhabited by ordinary human beings, instead of some fictitious creatures. Among other things, Plato’s intent is to highlight the weakness of our human nature in both parts of the simile. Consequently, concerning someone’s chance to become true philosopher, Plato’s view is quite pessimistic.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Annas, J. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. New York, Oxford University Press, 1981.
Barney, R. (2008). ‘Eros and Necessity in the Ascent from the Cave’. Ancient Philosophy 28: 357–72.
Benardete, S. Socrates’ Second Sailing on Plato’s Republic. Chicago/London, The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Broadie, S. Plato’s Sun-Like Good: Dialectic in the Republic. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Brunschwig, J. (2003). ‘Revisiting Plato’s Cave’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 19: 145–73.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1997). ‘Culture and Society in Plato’s Republic’. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 20: 217–324.
Crombie, I. M. An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines, Vol. ii: Plato on Knowledge and Reality. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.
Dorter, K. The Transformation of Plato’s Republic. Oxford, Lexington Books, 2006.
Ferejohn, M. T. (2006). ‘Knowledge, Recollection, and the Forms in Republic vii’. In Santas, G. The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford: 214–33.
Ferguson, A. S. (1922). ‘Plato’s Simile of Light (Continued). Part ii. The Allegory of the Cave’. The Classical Quarterly 16 (1): 15–28.
Hall, D. (1980). ‘Interpreting Plato’s Cave as an Allegory of the Human Condition’. Apeiron 14 (2): 74–86.
Harte, V. (2007). ‘Language in the Cave’. In Scott, D. Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 195–215.
Irwin, T. Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1977.
Johansen, T. (2013). ‘Timaeus in the Cave’. In Boys-Stones, G.; El Murr D. and Gill C. The Platonic Art of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 90–109.
Karasmanis, V. (1988). ‘Plato’s Republic: The Line and the Cave’. Apeiron 21: 147–81.
Ledbetter, G. (2017). ‘The Power of Plato’s Cave’. In Destrée, P. Mnemosyne Supplements 405: Plato and the Power of Images. Brill, Leiden/Boston: 121–37.
Malcolm, J. (1981). ‘The Cave Revisited’. The Classical Quarterly 31 (1): 60–8.
Meinwald, C. Plato. Oxford, Routledge, 2016.
Raven (1953). ‘Sun, Divided Line, and Cave’. The Classical Quarterly 3: 22–32.
Reeve, C. D. C. Philosopher-Kings: The argument of Plato’s Republic. Indianapolis/Cambridge, Hackett Publishing Company, 2006 [first published in Princeton University Press, 1988].
Rowe, C. (transl. with an introduction and notes) Plato: The Republic. London, Penguin Books, 2012.
Schofield, M. Plato: Political Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006.
Schofield, M. (2007). ‘Metaspeleology’. In Scott, D. Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 216–31.
Scott, D. Plato’s Meno. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Scott, D. (2011). ‘The Republic’. In Fine, G. The Oxford Handbook of Plato. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York: 360–382.
Sedley, D. (2007). ‘Philosophy, The Forms, and the Art of Ruling’. In Ferrari, G. R. F. The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge University Press, New York: 256–283.
Slings, S. R. (2003). Platonis Rempvplicam. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2003.
Smith, N. D. (1997). ‘How the Prisoners in Plato’s Cave are “Like Us”’. Proceedings in The Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 13: 187–204.
Weiss, R. Philosophers in the Republic: Plato’s Two Paradigms. Ithaca/London, Cornell University Press, 2012.
Wilberding, J. (2004). ‘Prisoners and Puppeteers in the Cave’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27: 117–39.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 325 | 150 | 13 |
Full Text Views | 96 | 10 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 205 | 30 | 1 |
This paper questions the traditional interpretation of Plato’s Republic 515a5. When Socrates claims that the prisoners in the simile of the Cave are ‘like us’, he does not imply any sort of similarity or analogy between their cognitive state and ours. Rather, I argue he says that we should imagine a cave inhabited by ordinary human beings, instead of some fictitious creatures. Among other things, Plato’s intent is to highlight the weakness of our human nature in both parts of the simile. Consequently, concerning someone’s chance to become true philosopher, Plato’s view is quite pessimistic.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 325 | 150 | 13 |
Full Text Views | 96 | 10 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 205 | 30 | 1 |