Eventocracy, Affective Supremacy and Resistance in Turkey’s Captured Media Ecology
In: Middle East Journal of Culture and CommunicationSearch for other papers by Ergin Bulut in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The Turkish government has captured media to build ‘eventocracy’, a regime of ‘ruling by event’ to manage public attention and disrupt politics. Eventocracy strives for affective supremacy, a mode of political-emotional domination where the ruling AKP positions itself as the self-righteous national power. Through a chain of events, it casts the opposition’s grievances as national threats. Two specific events, the Roboski Massacre and the Kabataş Incident, demonstrate how the government has mobilized bitter arguments and sensational narratives with often sexist and ethnicist undertones of supremacy to affectively deplete the opposition. In response, narratives produced by citizens in low-budget street interviews and rap artists in songs contest this affective supremacy, revealing that institutional media capture remains fragile at best. Reframing media capture through affect helps us rethink the state as a key media producer and performer of political crises while questioning fact-checking as an oppositional style across authoritarian contexts.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ahmed, Sara (2004). Affective Economies. Social Text, 22(2): 117–139.
-
Arendt, Hannah (1976). The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego, New York and London: A Harvest Book Harcourt Brace and Company.
-
Armbrust, Walter (2019). Martyrs and Tricksters: An Ethnography of the Egyptian Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
BBC Türkçe (2017). Roboski’de neler yaşandı? Accessed 20 September 2021: https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-42501681, 28 December 2017.
-
Berlant, Lauren (2005). The Epistemology of State Emotion. In Sarat, Austin (ed.), Dissent in Dangerous Times, pp. 46–81. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
-
Besley, Timothy and Andrea Prat (2006). Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability. American Economic Review, 96(3): 720–736.
-
Bianet (2012). Roboski’yi ‘Terör Örgütü ve Uzantıları’ Gündemde Tutuyor, Accessed 20 September 2021: https://www.bianet.org/bianet/siyaset/138609-roboski-yi-teror-orgutu-ve-uzantilari-gundemde-tutuyor, 25 May 2012.
-
Bianet (2022). Erdoğan calls Gezi Park protestors ‘sluts.’ Accessed 1 August 2022: https://bianet.org/english/politics/262711-erdogan-calls-gezi-park-protesters-sluts, 1 June 2022.
-
Bildirici, Faruk (2021). Faruk Bildirici: ‘Diliniz kaba vicdanınız taş’ değilse özür dileyin, T24. Accessed 22 September 2021: https://t24.com.tr/haber/faruk-bildirici-diliniz-kaba-vicdaniniz-tas-degilse-ozur-dileyin,968817, 29 July 2021.
-
Boler, Megan and Elizabeth Davis (2021). Introduction: Propaganda by Other Means. In Boler, Megan and Elizabeth Davis (eds.), Affective Politics of Digital Media: Propaganda by Other Means, pp. 1–51. London: Routledge.
-
Bulut, Ergin and Nurçin İleri (2019). Screening Right-Wing Populism in ‘New Turkey’: Neo-Ottomanism, Historical Dramas and the Case of Payitaht Abdulhamid. In Shimpach, Shawn (ed.), Routledge Companion to Global Television, pp. 244–256. London: Routledge.
-
Bratich, Jack (2008). Conspiracy Panics: Political Rationality and Popular Culture. Albany: SUNY Press.
-
Calvet, Catherine and Hala Kodmani (2019). Hamit Bozarslan: “Croire à l’effondrement de nos sociétés, c’est renoncer à la résistance, à toute responsabilité”, Libération. Accessed 29 September 2021: https://www.liberation.fr/debats/2019/03/31/hamit-bozarslan-croire-a-l-effondrement-de-nos-societes-c-est-renoncer-a-la-resistance-a-toute-respo_1718528/, 31 March 2019.
-
Corner, John and Dick Pels (2003). Media and the Restyling of Politics: Consumerism, Celebrity and Cynicism. London: Sage.
-
Debord, Guy (1983). The Society of the Spectacle. London: Rebel Press.
-
Diken (2015). ‘Kabataş’ korosu tek ses: ‘Diliniz KABA, vicdanınız TAŞ.’ Accessed 17 September 2021. Available at: https://www.diken.com.tr/kabatas-korosu-tek-ses-diliniz-kaba-vicdaniniz-tas/, 5 March 2015.
-
El-Hibri, Hatim (2021). Visions of Beirut: The Urban Life of Media Infrastructure. Durham: Duke University Press.
-
Emre, Perrin Ö. and Gülüm Şener (2018). “My Body, My Decision”. The Abortion Debate and Twitter as a Counterpublic Sphere for Women in Turkey. In Wimmer, Jeffrey et al. (eds.), (Mis)Understanding Political Participation: Digital Practices, New Forms of Participation and the Renewal of Democracy, pp. 138–158. London: Routledge.
-
Evrensel (2015). ‘Erdoğan, ‘Kabataş yalanı’nı sürdürüyor.’ Accessed 17 September 2021: https://www.evrensel.net/haber/106914/erdogan-kabatas-yalanini-surduruyor, 6 March 2015.
-
Gerçek Gündem (2021). Medya mensuplarının gizlice fotoğrafı çekildi: ‘Sokak röportaj için “basin kartı” şartı getiriliyor!’ Accessed 16 November 2021: https://www.gercekgundem.com/medya/303488/medya-mensuplarinin-gizlice-fotografi-cekildi-sokak-roportaj-icin-basin-karti-sarti-getiriliyor, 4 October 2021.
-
Govil, Nitin and Anirban Kapil Baishya (2018). The Bully in the Pulpit: Autocracy, Digital Social Media, and Right-wing Populist Technoculture. Communication, Culture and Critique, 11(1): 67–84.
-
Hall, Kira, Donna Meryl Goldstein and Matthew Bruce Ingram (2016). The Hands of Donald Trump: Entertainment, Gesture, Spectacle. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(2): 71–100.
-
Halk TV (2021). AKP’li başkandan ‘Keşke bizim de evimiz yansaydı diyecekler’ sözleri üzerine skandal özür. Accessed 8 October 2022: https://halktv.com.tr/gundem/akpli-baskandan-keske-bizim-de-evimiz-yansaydi-diyecekler-sozleri-uzerine-skandal-467307h, 3 August 2021.
-
Harsin, Jayson (2015). Regimes of Post-truth, Post-politics, and Attention Economies. Communication, Culture and Critique, 8(2): 327–333.
-
Hintz, Lisel (2021). The Empire’s Opposition Strikes Back: Popular Culture as Creative Resistance Tool under Turkey’s AKP. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 48(1): 24–43.
-
Hoyng, Rolien (2020). Platforms for populism? The Affective Issue Crowd and its Disconnections. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6): 984–1001.
-
Hoyng, Rolien and Murat Es (2017). Conspiratorial Webs: Media Ecology and Parallel Realities in Turkey. International Journal of Communication, 11: 4219–4238.
-
Hürriyet (2012). ‘Bakan Akdağ’dan kürtaj açıklaması’. Accessed 24 September 2021: https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/bakan-akdagdan-kurtaj-aciklamasi-20655979, 31 May 2012.
-
Hürriyet (2015a). Kabataş iddiasını ilk kez yazan gazetede 2 yıl sonra ilginç tespit: Saçmasapan kurgular ürettiler. Accessed 17 September 2021: https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/kabatas-iddiasini-ilk-kez-yazan-gazetede-2-yil-sonra-ilginc-tespit-sacmasapan-kurgular-urettiler-29535778, 13 July 2015.
-
Hürriyet (2015b). Kabataş’ta aslında ne oldu. Accessed 7 May 2018: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/kabatasta-aslinda-ne-oldu-40005830, 25 October 2015.
-
İlgün, Serpil (2020). ‘Prof. Dr. Hamit Bozarslan: Gündem değiştirilmiyor rejim tahkim ediliyor’. Accessed 29 September 2021: https://www.evrensel.net/haber/415555/prof-dr-hamit-bozarslan-gundem-degistirilmiyor-rejim-tahkim-ediliyor, 3 October 2020.
-
İşeri, Emre and Metin Ersoy (2021). Framing the Syrian Operations: Populism in Foreign Policy and the Polarized News Media of Turkey. International Journal of Communication, 15: 2870–2893.
-
Jutel, Olivier (2019). Civility, Subversion and Technocratic Class Consciousness: Reconstituting Truth in the Journalistic Field. In Overell, Rosemary and Brett Nicholls. (eds.) Post-Truth and the Mediation of Reality, pp. 177–203. Cham: Switzerland.
-
Kalyan, Rohan (2020). Eventocracy: Media and Politics in Times of Aspirational Fascism. Theory & Event, 23 (1): 4–28.
-
Kaptan, Yeşim and Marwan Kraidy (2021). Depoliticizing Politics: Egypt’s Media Boycotts in the Turkish Media. Communication, Culture and Critique, 14 (3): 405–421.
-
Karar (2022). Erdoğan’dan eleştirilere yanıt: Biz hep milletimizin diliyle konuştuk. Accessed 5 October 2022: https://www.karar.com/guncel-haberler/erdogan-teror-koridorunu-darmaduman-ettik-1669021, 4 June 2022
-
Karakuş, Filiz (2012). ‘22 İlde Eşzamanlı Eylem: Kürtaj Haktır Karar Kadınların!’, Çatlak Zemin. Accessed 24 September 2021: https://catlakzemin.com/8-haziran-2012-22-ilde-eszamanli-eylem-kurtaj-haktir-karar-kadinlarin/, 8 June 2021.
-
Kinnvall, Catarina (2019). Populism, Ontological Insecurity and Hindutva: Modi and the Masculinization of Indian Politics. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(3): 283–302.
-
Korkman, Zeynep K. (2016). Politics of Intimacy in Turkey: A Distraction from ‘Real’ Politics? Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 12(1): 112–121.
-
Kraidy, Marwan (2017). The Projectilic Image: Islamic State’s Digital Visual Warfare and Global Networked Affect. Media, Culture & Society, 39(8): 1194–1209.
-
Kumar, Ravish (2016). ‘Welcome to the Eventocracy, Tracked by Comedia.’ Accessed 5 October 2022: https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/events-eventocracy-policy-announcement-media-demonetisation-jnu-row-fake-news-4452319/, 31 December 2016.
-
Kuntsman, Adi (2020). Reverberation, Affect, and Digital Politics of Responsibility. In Boler, Megan and Elizabeth Davis (eds.), Affective Politics of Digital Media: Propaganda by Other Means, pp. 69–85. London: Routledge.
-
Martin, James (2019). Psychopolitics of Speech: Uncivil Discourse and the Excess of Desire. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
McIntyre, Lee (2018). Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
McKernan, Bethan (2021). ‘Anger in Turkey grows over government’s handling of wildfires.’ Accessed 3 September 2021: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/03/anger-in-turkey-grows-over-governments-handling-of-wildfires, 3 August 2021.
-
Mirzoeff, Nicholas (2011). The Right to Look: A Counter History of Visuality. Durham: Duke University Press.
-
Moffitt, Benjamin (2015). How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism. Government and Opposition, 50(2): 189–217.
-
Mutluer, Nil (2019a). Gendered, sexualized and ethnicized clashes in Turkey’s media. In Eide, Elisabeth, Kristin Skare Orgeret and Nil Mutluer (eds.), Transnational Othering—Global Diversities: Media, Extremism and Free Expression, pp. 253–271. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
-
Mutluer, Nil (2019b). The intersectionality of gender, sexuality, and religion: novelties and continuities in Turkey during the AKP era. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 19(1): 99–118.
-
OdaTV (2013). Ayşenur Arslan CNNTürk’te yaşadıklarını anlattı: Accessed 22 September 2021: https://www.odatv4.com//guncel/aysenur-arslan-cnnturkte-yasadiklarini-anlatti-2610131200-46737, 26 October 2013.
-
Roy, Srirupa (2021). Target Politics: Digital and Data Technologies and Election Campaigns. In Vasudevan, Ravi (ed.), Media and the Constitution of the Political: South Asia and Beyond, pp. 285–310. New Delhi: Sage.
-
Ruhavioğlu, Reha (2015). Dersim ve Roboskî Katliamları Karşısında Medyanın Tutumu. Accessed 16 December 2021: https://birikimdergisi.com/guncel/1240/dersim-ve-roboski-katliamlari-karsisinda-medyanin-tutumu, 1 August 2015.
-
Schiffrin, Anya (2018). Introduction to Special Issue on media capture. Journalism, 19(8): 1033–1042.
-
Sharpe, Kenan B. (2019). ‘Why Turkey’s Rappers Can No Longer Stay Silent’—Al-Monitor: The Pulse of the Middle East. Accessed 29 September 2021: https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2019/09/turkish-rap-stirs-up-political-controversy.html, 9 September 2019.
-
Sundaram, Ravi (2020). Hindu nationalism’s crisis machine. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 10 (8): 734–741.
-
Taş, Hakkı (2020). The Chronopolitics of National Populism. Identities, 29(2): 127–145.
-
Terranova, Tiziana (2007). Futurepublic: On Information Warfare, Bioracism and Hegemony as
-
Noopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3): 125–145.
-
Tokdoğan, Nagehan (2020). Reading Politics Through Emotions Ontological Ressentiment as the Emotional Basis of Current Politics in Turkey. Nations and Nationalism, 26(2): 388–406.
-
TRTHaber (2012). ‘Başbakan: Her Kürtaj Bir Uludere’dir.’ Accessed 22 September 2021: https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/basbakan-her-kurtaj-bir-uluderedir-42333.html, 26 May 2012.
-
Wedeen, Lisa (1999). Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Yanatma, Servet (2021). Advertising and Media Capture in Turkey: How Does the State Emerge as the Largest Advertiser with the Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(4): 797–821.
-
Yeşil, Bilge (2018). Authoritarian Turn or Continuity? Governance of Media through Capture and Discipline in the AKP Era. South European Society and Politics, 23(2): 239–257.
-
Yeşil, Bilge (2019). #TurkeyIsNotAChicken: How Pro-government Netizens Explain the Coup Attempt to Western Audiences. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 12(2): 166–184.
-
Yeşil, Bilge (2021). Social media manipulation in Turkey: actors, tactics, targets. In Tumber, Howard and Silvio Waisbord (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism, pp. 386–397. London: Routledge.
-
Yildiz, Erkan. and Kevin Smets (2019). Internet Trolling in ‘Networked’ Authoritarianism: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Tweets by Regime Supporters and ‘Ak Trolls’ in July 2016. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 12(3): 348–368.
-
Yılmaz, Latif (2021). Hannah Arendt’in İzinde (I): Zamanı Adlandırmak ve Kayıtsızlık Sorunu. Accessed 29 September 2021: https://birikimdergisi.com/guncel/10649/hannah-arendtin-izinde-i-zamani-adlandirmak-ve-kayitsizlik-sorunu, 24 June 2021.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 838 | 488 | 55 |
| Full Text Views | 133 | 6 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 182 | 19 | 6 |
Eventocracy, Affective Supremacy and Resistance in Turkey’s Captured Media Ecology
In: Middle East Journal of Culture and CommunicationSearch for other papers by Ergin Bulut in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The Turkish government has captured media to build ‘eventocracy’, a regime of ‘ruling by event’ to manage public attention and disrupt politics. Eventocracy strives for affective supremacy, a mode of political-emotional domination where the ruling AKP positions itself as the self-righteous national power. Through a chain of events, it casts the opposition’s grievances as national threats. Two specific events, the Roboski Massacre and the Kabataş Incident, demonstrate how the government has mobilized bitter arguments and sensational narratives with often sexist and ethnicist undertones of supremacy to affectively deplete the opposition. In response, narratives produced by citizens in low-budget street interviews and rap artists in songs contest this affective supremacy, revealing that institutional media capture remains fragile at best. Reframing media capture through affect helps us rethink the state as a key media producer and performer of political crises while questioning fact-checking as an oppositional style across authoritarian contexts.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 838 | 488 | 55 |
| Full Text Views | 133 | 6 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 182 | 19 | 6 |
